Support NeoGAF

[IbizaPocholo]

The Rockstar Advanced Game Engine (RAGE) is one of the industry's most guarded proprietary secrets. While other AAA titans abandoned their internal software pipelines to license commercial engines, Rockstar Games spent two decades quietly engineering a highly specialized architecture designed from the ground up for massive, seamless open-world simulation.

In this technical breakdown, we strip away the consumer marketing to dissect the low-level rendering pipelines, physics budgets, and asset-streaming data matrices that give Grand Theft Auto and Red Dead Redemption their signature, grounded realism. From its desperate middleware origins to the groundbreaking hybrid deferred PBR loops of RDR2, we explore the engineering genius that makes RAGE an absolute masterpiece of game engine architecture.

We also break open public, highly advanced patents filed by Take-Two Interactive—including a look into a radical, data-driven virtual character locomotion system and hardware-optimized light bounce mapping—to decode the speculative blueprints driving the future of RAGE 9.

If you are a professional technical artist, graphics programmer, environment artist, or game engine enthusiast, this is your complete architectural breakdown of Rockstar's core engine framework.

Timestamps
0:00 Intro
2:18 Brief History
5:51 The Physics Architecture & Core Technical Pillars
10:22 Rendering Pipeline
21:47 Streaming & Draw Distance
26:54 The Environment Artist's Lens
30:10 Full Course Promotion
30:56 Patents
33:53 Testimonies
36:19 Conclusion

• 00:01–01:44 – The video introduces Rockstar Advanced Game Engine (RAGE) as one of the industry's most advanced proprietary engines, highlighting its evolution from early forward rendering to hybrid deferred rendering, advanced streaming, Euphoria physics integration, and future-looking Take-Two patents that hint at the architecture behind a possible "RAGE 9."
• 02:11–05:29 – RAGE was born after Electronic Arts acquired Criterion in 2004, making Rockstar dependent on a competitor's RenderWare engine. Rockstar instead expanded Angel Studios' AGE engine into RAGE, with Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis (2006) serving as a technical prototype to validate rendering, physics, cloth simulation, and multi-threading before scaling to GTA IV.
• 05:53–10:10 – The engine's signature realism comes from combining animation with real-time physics. Rather than playing canned animations, RAGE continuously simulates bones, balance, and muscle forces through NaturalMotion Euphoria, creating dynamic stumbles, procedural reactions, and weighty movement. The trade-off is slightly less responsive controls in exchange for more believable character behavior.
• 10:36–15:21 – The presentation traces RAGE's rendering evolution: from Forward+ lighting in GTA IV and Red Dead Redemption to a hybrid deferred renderer in GTA V, then to physically based rendering, volumetric lighting, atmospheric scattering, and optimized hardware ray tracing in Red Dead Redemption 2 and current-generation versions of GTA V.
• 15:21–21:45 – Using a RenderDoc frame analysis of GTA V, the video explains the engine's rendering pipeline: cubemap reflections, G-buffers, SSAO, shadow maps, water rendering, volumetric fog, cloud rendering, transparency passes, FXAA, and post-processing, illustrating how Rockstar balances visual quality with performance.
• 21:45–30:21 – A major focus is RAGE's streaming and HLOD system, which avoids loading screens by dividing the world into streaming cells, using hierarchical spatial partitioning, procedural asset generation, sparse virtual texturing, and asynchronous streaming. This allows GTA's massive worlds to stream seamlessly while minimizing memory usage and install size.
• 30:47–33:55 – The video examines several Take-Two patents that may influence future RAGE technology, including procedural world generation, modular character locomotion, sparse fluid simulation (for effects like sweat and blood), and more efficient global illumination and terrain deformation. The presenter stresses these patents are speculative and not confirmed GTA VI features.
• 33:55–37:30 – Former developers reportedly describe RAGE as both powerful and challenging: its tools are highly specialized for Rockstar's open-world games but suffer from legacy complexity and sparse documentation. Despite this, continual architectural rewrites have kept the engine competitive across multiple console generations.
• 37:30–38:54 – The conclusion argues that RAGE remains a benchmark for proprietary game engines because it tightly integrates streaming, physics, rendering, and animation into a unified system. Rather than optimizing individual technologies in isolation, Rockstar engineers every subsystem around the goal of making large open worlds feel physically alive.

 

[naguanatak]

Good video
Can't assess it's accuracy, but definitely interesting channel which I discovered around Crimson Deserts launch while looking into the Blackspace engine

 

[yogaflame]

Rockstar engine perfected a very stable 30 fps.

 

[Loomy]

This is going to age poorly when Red Dead 3 or GTA7 launches using Unreal 6 lol

 

[CentralScrutinizer]

Rockstar engine perfected a very stable 30 fps.

I wish my balls looked that good.

Cant sleep so this will be the perfect watch. Checking it out now

 

[Black_Stride]

Short answer it doesnt?


NaturalMotion no longer licensing out Euphoria is a real tragedy

 

[crackajack]

Just guessing, but Rockstar just gets the time needed while the engine in itself hardly does anything special other's couldn't.
Anvil, Frostbite, Snowdrop, 4A, Dunia, Decima etc. all could probably do the same, their products are just rushed out of the door and never that cooked/optimised. Especially the master of nothing Unreal has probably the most stuff in it but its products are not hacked by the individual devs needs anymore, like eg Batman Arkham was.

 

[Thief1987]

Everything what is talked about in this video is a very basic stuff. It sounds like garbage pr, or author just don't know what he is talking about

 

[TheHellenicGuy]

Just guessing, but Rockstar just gets the time needed while the engine in itself hardly does anything special other's couldn't.
Anvil, Frostbite, Snowdrop, 4A, Dunia, Decima etc. all could probably do the same, their products are just rushed out of the door and never that cooked/optimised. Especially the master of nothing Unreal has probably the most stuff in it but its products are not hacked by the individual devs needs anymore, like eg Batman Arkham was.

Are you calling Metro, Battlefield, Killzone, Death Stranding and Horizon games as 'rushed out of the door' and 'never that cooked/optimized'?
Mighty risky statement there.

Don't forget that those games are completely different from what GTA/RDR games do. Each engine does a good job in certain genres.
For example, I doubt RAGE would fare well in FPS/RTS/Horror games.

 

[Panajev2001a]

Are you calling Metro, Battlefield, Killzone, Death Stranding and Horizon games as 'rushed out of the door' and 'never that cooked/optimized'?
Mighty risky statement there.

Don't forget that those games are completely different from what GTA/RDR games do. Each engine does a good job in certain genres.
For example, I doubt RAGE would fare well in FPS/RTS/Horror games.

No, but they do not get a 10 years or so dev cycle with the kind of budget this game gets.

Still, this is what a good engine is, RAGE I mean, something tuned for the games you want to make because well this is what you sell and it has to be good… some devs need to remember you are there to learn tools and how things work.

 

[naguanatak]

Just guessing, but Rockstar just gets the time needed while the engine in itself hardly does anything special other's couldn't.
Anvil, Frostbite, Snowdrop, 4A, Dunia, Decima etc. all could probably do the same, their products are just rushed out of the door and never that cooked/optimised. Especially the master of nothing Unreal has probably the most stuff in it but its products are not hacked by the individual devs needs anymore, like eg Batman Arkham was.

which other engine simulates so much stuff besides Blackspace?
if the information is correct, and I always assumed it was that way before the video, characters motion in RAGE is a simulation of muscle forces and tension, not just an animation that gets triggered when you move the stick.
If other engines do this I want to know, because I like the particular feel characters in Rockstar games have.
I don't know if Blackspace simulates movement in that way, but it does feel somewhat similiar to something like RDR2, which I absolutely adore.
So feel free to point me in the direction of other games feeling like this.

 

[Shubh_C63]

This is going to age poorly when Red Dead 3 or GTA7 launches using Unreal 6 lol

I fear WE will age poorly reading about Gta7 in 2050.

 

[crackajack]

Don't forget that those games are completely different from what GTA/RDR games do.

Some of them definitely try the open world filler stuff GTA (starting with probably SA) and TES (since the beginning but most notably Morrowind/Skyrim due their impact) did on a stupid scale.

Compared with the time Rockstar gets, those are all rushed. One game per gen for any studio is becoming the norm, but Rockstar where in that cycle sooner.

I doubt RAGE would fare well in FPS/RTS/Horror games.

Any modern engine can do anything imho. Games became quite similar lately also because all moved away from linear storytelling.
Frostbite eg is running Fifa and BF and Mass Effect. (kinda same as Unreal which is definitely running any genre there is) If EA allowed the teams "Rockstar time" it could and should have aced it even more.

 

[GymWolf]

Short answer it doesnt?


NaturalMotion no longer licensing out Euphoria is a real tragedy

Nobody stop other devs from creating their own euphoria engine.

The small indie team behind half sword are making their own proprietary euphoria engine for animations and after more than 200 hours on it, i can safely say it is already much better than euphoria in some specific things, and much worse in others, the game is still in early access vers 6.2,i'm hyped for the final result.



If they can, everyone can.

Even something like bodycam has simil euphoria for death stumbles.

 

[MMaRsu]

Everything what is talked about in this video is a very basic stuff. It sounds like garbage pr, or author just don't know what he is talking about

I believe its a bullahit channel.

There is no "RAGE 9"

 

[Black_Stride]

Nobody stop other devs from creating their own euphoria engine.

The small indie team behind half sword are making their own proprietary euphoria engine for animations and after more than 200 hours on it, i can safely say it is already much better than euphoria in some specific things, and much worse in others, the game is still in early access vers 6.2,i'm hyped for the final result.



If they can, everyone can.

Even something like bodycam has simil euphoria for death stumbles.

And none of what you showed comes anywhere near Euphoria.

But I like what im seeing.
Would still like to see more games using Euphoria.
If Mafia was successful enough hopefully its sequel will have Euphoria heck bring back SpecOps and use Euphoria.

 

[GymWolf]

And none of what you showed comes anywhere near Euphoria.

But I like what im seeing.
Would still like to see more games using Euphoria.
If Mafia was successful enough hopefully its sequel will have Euphoria heck bring back SpecOps and use Euphoria.

What? The stumbles in bodycam look as good as any rockstar stumbles and i played all of their games and you havent played half sword, that video is like 2 years old, their animation engine already does things that euphoria doesnt do like enemies trying to stabilize and still fight with hurt\broken legs or arms or cut injuries and the injuries are not momentary like on rdr2 or gta5, and it is not only appllied to enemies but to the player aswell, believe me, there is no other game in the market where hitting someone with a blunt weapon to the head is as satisfying and varied as half sword in terms of reactions, the engine is still far from done so it can look silly and glitch and slidey a lot of times, but when it work...
It's not like euphoria never glitch or it's always perfect, quite the contrary...

The point is, if small indie studios can make their own euphoria engine, the big studios can definitely try the same with even better results.

 

[Aressa]

But the actual games are poorly optimized and run like absolute shit in practice.

 

[Panajev2001a]

Frostbite eg is running Fifa and BF and Mass Effect. (kinda same as Unreal which is definitely running any genre there is) If EA allowed the teams "Rockstar time" it could and should have aced it even more.

Funny that you say that as it actually made the devs' lives a lot lot harder in the case of Mass Effect for example as a lot of what the expected for an RPG just was not there (so they essentially promised an RPG and commited to a cost and schedule not based on also building an engine, because the business mandated Frostbite because "all engines are the same commmmm'on", but that is the SVP level / MBA C-level exec view about cost savings mandating a common engine for everything as if they were no compromises.

To this day UE still struggles with large and detailed open world games with devs like CDPR essentially rewriting core chunks and essentially replacing Epic or a good chunk of the work from Epic devs for what will be UE6.

 

[crackajack]

Funny that you say that as it actually made the devs' lives a lot lot harder in the case of Mass Effect for example as a lot of what the expected for an RPG just was not there (so they essentially promised an RPG and commited to a cost and schedule not based on also building an engine, because the business mandated Frostbite because "all engines are the same commmmm'on", but that is the SVP level / MBA C-level exec view about cost savings mandating a common engine for everything as if they were no compromises.

To this day UE still struggles with large and detailed open world games with devs like CDPR essentially rewriting core chunks and essentially replacing Epic or a good chunk of the work from Epic devs for what will be UE6.

All "hacked" engines can do all sorts of things. Rockstar is given a lot of time, while others need to rush (and modern "easy" Unreal tries too much in one all you can eat tool monster and seems like no one is properly adapting it anymore lik ethey used to). That's kinda my point.
That's the only thing actually special about Rage. Time. Otherwise naturally all engines have to use the same features GPU and CPU makers offer them while some clever ideas are kinda shared via GDC eg. For some reason, at least on a core level, not actual code though, not officially (I guess some friends might share more than they allowed to), but always surprises me that those presentations are pretty open to anyone.

 

[yogaflame]

Fromsoftware and rockstar are the masters of 30 fps

 

[GymWolf]

Fromsoftware and rockstar are the masters of 30 fps

Except one achieve 30 fps by pushing tech limits, the other cant code good performances to save their lives and only test our patience limits

 

[Donald mac Ronald]

This is going to age poorly when Red Dead 3 or GTA7 launches using Unreal 6 lol

We'll be in retirement homes then

 

[Guilty_AI]

which other engine simulates so much stuff besides Blackspace?
if the information is correct, and I always assumed it was that way before the video, characters motion in RAGE is a simulation of muscle forces and tension, not just an animation that gets triggered when you move the stick.
If other engines do this I want to know, because I like the particular feel characters in Rockstar games have.
I don't know if Blackspace simulates movement in that way, but it does feel somewhat similiar to something like RDR2, which I absolutely adore.
So feel free to point me in the direction of other games feeling like this.

I think what you mean are games that prioritize animation over user input. Instead of having predictable character movement control, moving the stick triggers an animation that then moves the character the way you want. Not really a RAGE thing, and actually disliked by a lot of people, which is why it isnt very common.

 

[pqueue]

It IS a great engine that can handle lots of detail, but it still has way too much pop-in for 2026.

 

[Hudo]

But the actual games are poorly optimized and run like absolute shit in practice.

And control horribly. At least RDR 2 does. GTA 5 also was a downgrade in how the input translated into actual movement of your character but not as much as in RDR 2. Not sure if that's an engine issue due to how input is read or how the animation system seems to dictate what inputs are read and how or if it's just an implementation issue unrelated to the engine.

 

[MrCunningham]

Short answer it doesnt?


NaturalMotion no longer licensing out Euphoria is a real tragedy

Max Payne 3 is one of the peak examples of the Euphoria engine when it comes down to soft character body physics and procedural animation. It really worked so well with the games bullet time. I feel like it is why Max Payne 3 is underrated as far as third person shooters go.

 

[naguanatak]

I think what you mean are games that prioritize animation over user input. Instead of having predictable character movement control, moving the stick triggers an animation that then moves the character the way you want. Not really a RAGE thing, and actually disliked by a lot of people, which is why it isnt very common.

I know that it is disliked by a lot of people, which is really sad in my opinion. But I can fully understand why it is disliked and why someone would like a system that prioritizes input more than animation priority.
I just like it when characters and objects behave as if they have weight to them, not ice skating over terrain. But I followed the discourse after RDR2 and to this day, most people dislike what feels like massive input lag in the controls of RDR2. To me - and I've said this over and over again - it feels natural and far better than the direct response of other characters in other games. That's just personal preference.

So, it isnt true that RAGE simulates force and tension for the characters movements? It's just the animation priority?

 

[Guilty_AI]

I know that it is disliked by a lot of people, which is really sad in my opinion. But I can fully understand why it is disliked and why someone would like a system that prioritizes input more than animation priority.
I just like it when characters and objects behave as if they have weight to them, not ice skating over terrain. But I followed the discourse after RDR2 and to this day, most people dislike what feels like massive input lag in the controls of RDR2. To me - and I've said this over and over again - it feels natural and far better than the direct response of other characters in other games. That's just personal preference.

So, it isnt true that RAGE simulates force and tension for the characters movements? It's just the animation priority?

The force and tension is for things like ragdoll and other types of physics reactions, like the way they fall when they get shot and how other impacts affect them.

 

[GymWolf]

I know that it is disliked by a lot of people, which is really sad in my opinion. But I can fully understand why it is disliked and why someone would like a system that prioritizes input more than animation priority.
I just like it when characters and objects behave as if they have weight to them, not ice skating over terrain. But I followed the discourse after RDR2 and to this day, most people dislike what feels like massive input lag in the controls of RDR2. To me - and I've said this over and over again - it feels natural and far better than the direct response of other characters in other games. That's just personal preference.

So, it isnt true that RAGE simulates force and tension for the characters movements? It's just the animation priority?

Same, i prefer weighty movement over sliding.

 

[naguanatak]

The force and tension is for things like ragdoll and other types of physics reactions, like the way they fall when they get shot and how other impacts affect them.

But, isnt Euphoria as a middleware used to simulate muscle tension and balance depending on where a character is in the environment? This isn't just used to animate the ragdoll when shooting people or running them over with your car, but as you move the stick to control the main character... or am I completely misinterpreting information about the engine and the feeling of Arthur in RDR2?

Same, i prefer weighty movement over sliding.

I know that you do I remember your name from various interactions on here and this is one of the most niche preferences, I feel. Most people just dislike stuff like this, that's why we have 90% ice skating protagonists in our video games that twitch around like they have epilepsy

 

[jufonuk]

ID tech would shit over everything if carmack hadn't left.

 

[Guilty_AI]

But, isnt Euphoria as a middleware used to simulate muscle tension and balance depending on where a character is in the environment? This isn't just used to animate the ragdoll when shooting people or running them over with your car, but as you move the stick to control the main character... or am I completely misinterpreting information about the engine and the feeling of Arthur in RDR2?

Tecnically speaking, it is used for every single aspect of the animation since thats just how these engines work. What i mean is that the animation priority movement the engine handles, the one that gives the weighty feeling, isnt a particularly unique element of rage.

But if what you meant is ask whether the character is moving their arms and legs according to the physics engine at every single moment, then no, it isnt doing that. Its normal baked animation with a few dynamic elements for stuff like foot placement and leg bending. Though, rockstar briefly experimente with the notion in GTA 4 with the drunk physics.

 

[naguanatak]

What i mean is that the animation priority movement the engine handles, the one that gives the weighty feeling, isnt a particularly unique element of rage.

That makes sense, but then again, other than Pearl Abyss in Crimson Desert, which other dev prioritizes animation over input in recent years, or in general for that matter?

 

[Guilty_AI]

That makes sense, but then again, other than Pearl Abyss in Crimson Desert, which other dev prioritizes animation over input in recent years, or in general for that matter?

From what i can immediatly remember, ArmA games are like that. I think Kingdom Come games too but i havent played them myself yet to know.

 

[naguanatak]

From what i can immediatly remember, ArmA games are like that. I think Kingdom Come games too but i havent played them myself yet to know.

Played the first Kingdom Come for a while, doesn't feel anything like it. It's immersive and somewhat weighty. But I dislike first person

 

[GymWolf]

From what i can immediatly remember, ArmA games are like that. I think Kingdom Come games too but i havent played them myself yet to know.

Kc2 only has slow movements to simulate realism, but their animation system is terrible compared to rockstar, some of the most wooden ragdolll i ever seen.

It still feel lighter than an arthur imo, i heard almost no one complaining about the movements in kc2 like you would see in a rdr2 topic.

 

[Guilty_AI]

Kc2 only has slow movements to simulate realism, but their animation system is terrible compared to rockstar, some of the most wooden ragdolll i ever seen.

It still feel lighter than an arthur imo, i heard almost no one complaining about the movements in kc2 like you would see in a rdr2 topic.

Rockstar goes really overboard with it, other games with prioritized animation usually still try to find a balance. I believe TLoU and Death Stranding games are also like that, but it doesnt feel like GTA or RDR either.

 

[Black_Stride]

What? The stumbles in bodycam look as good as any rockstar stumbles and i played all of their games and you havent played half sword, that video is like 2 years old, their animation engine already does things that euphoria doesnt do like enemies trying to stabilize and still fight with hurt\broken legs or arms or cut injuries and the injuries are not momentary like on rdr2 or gta5, and it is not only appllied to enemies but to the player aswell, believe me, there is no other game in the market where hitting someone with a blunt weapon to the head is as satisfying and varied as half sword in terms of reactions, the engine is still far from done so it can look silly and glitch and slidey a lot of times, but when it work...
It's not like euphoria never glitch or it's always perfect, quite the contrary...

The point is, if small indie studios can make their own euphoria engine, the big studios can definitely try the same with even better results.

Euphoria is more than just a procedural ragdoll system.

Bodycams auto stabilize/balance is cool but Euphoria is a full musculature and nervous system simulation.
When you see what this does in GTA/RDR/Star Wars its actually insane.

Enemies due to have self preservation within the nervous system simulation will try to keep themselves alive by grabbing onto objects if you force lift them, theyll even hold on to each other all dynamically through Euphoria.
If they are about to fall off a ledge they automatically try to pull themselves up no canned animations they just "know" they need to keep themselves alive.
Shoot an enemy in the leg and they clutch at the injury they know where exactly the injury is thats all part of the nervous system simulation.

Euphoria is literally a digital brain for characters who have it fully integrated.
Euphoria based characters are actually aware of their environments which is why they can "try" limit damage from objects being thrown at them.

RDR and GTA actually use a lighter version of Euphoria, Star Wars with its more limited characters on screen at a time had more digital brains fully active at a time.

Its not just ragdoll and no indie studios are not just making their own Euphoria engines.

 

[GymWolf]

Rockstar goes really overboard with it, other games with prioritized animation usually still try to find a balance. I believe TLoU and Death Stranding games are also like that, but it doesnt feel like GTA or RDR either.

I can understand tlou2 doing a good compromise, but ds has a lot of silly, weightless animations mixed with the good ones and it doesnt really feel super fluid to control the character, melee combat felt like shit in that game imo, and when he fall from rocks and the body literally slide like he is covered with vaseline, it look awful to me.

Sorry but i take rdr2 over ds tbh.

 

[midnightAI]

No, but they do not get a 10 years or so dev cycle with the kind of budget this game gets.

Still, this is what a good engine is, RAGE I mean, something tuned for the games you want to make because well this is what you sell and it has to be good… some devs need to remember you are there to learn tools and how things work.

hmmmm, the engines kind of do, Decima has had, what, 13 years of development now? and that's with two teams working on optimisation (there is lots of back and forth between Guerrilla and Koji Pro), but your point stands about several other engines can or could do what RAGE does.

 

[VulcanRaven]

Short answer it doesnt?


NaturalMotion no longer licensing out Euphoria is a real tragedy

Do they have some exclusivity with Rockstar now?

I'm sad we never got this:

 

[naguanatak]

Do they have some exclusivity with Rockstar now?

I'm sad we never got this:

Take2 owns Zynga which owns Natural Motion

 

[VulcanRaven]

I know that it is disliked by a lot of people, which is really sad in my opinion. But I can fully understand why it is disliked and why someone would like a system that prioritizes input more than animation priority.
I just like it when characters and objects behave as if they have weight to them, not ice skating over terrain. But I followed the discourse after RDR2 and to this day, most people dislike what feels like massive input lag in the controls of RDR2. To me - and I've said this over and over again - it feels natural and far better than the direct response of other characters in other games. That's just personal preference.

So, it isnt true that RAGE simulates force and tension for the characters movements? It's just the animation priority?

I like the movement in RDR and GTA games too. It just wouldn't be the same anymore if it was removed. It doesn't need fixing.

 

[Black_Stride]

Do they have some exclusivity with Rockstar now?

I'm sad we never got this:

Zynga bought NaturalMotion.
Take-Two bought Zynga.

 

[GymWolf]

Euphoria is more than just a procedural ragdoll system.

Bodycams auto stabilize/balance is cool but Euphoria is a full musculature and nervous system simulation.
When you see what this does in GTA/RDR/Star Wars its actually insane.

Enemies due to have self preservation within the nervous system simulation will try to keep themselves alive by grabbing onto objects if you force lift them, theyll even hold on to each other all dynamically through Euphoria.
If they are about to fall off a ledge they automatically try to pull themselves up no canned animations they just "know" they need to keep themselves alive.
Shoot an enemy in the leg and they clutch at the injury thats all part of the nervous system simulation.

Euphoria is literally a digital brain for characters who have it fully integrated.
Euphoria based characters are actually aware of their environments which is why they can "try" limit damage from objects being thrown at them.

RDR and GTA actually use a lighter version of Euphoria, Star Wars with its more limited characters on screen at a time had more digital brains fully active at a time.

Its not just ragdoll and no indie studios are not just making their own Euphoria engines.

Half sword does all of that i think, maybe it miss a coupleof features but it also does stuff that rockstar games dont do, especially compared to the gimped euphoria version we had lately, i had enemies running from me because they were in danger, trying to run away, crawl away, covering their injuries with their hands, grabbing me to not fall, grabbing others to not get killed, trying to use their whole body to get up when injured, trying to walk and fight keeping into account their injuries, taking time to recover from blunt hits to the head and regain their balance, just not as good looking or perfected (and euphoria still glitch a lot aswell)

You cant really analize the game until you play the game, i only showed you that video because it was a general introduction, they dont even speak about all the features of their engine.

Worst i can say, is that since ragdoll is always on, the basic, general walking animations look a bit silly and the cutting damage system is kinda all over the place, but the game is far from done and they improve with every patch.

It is not a game that you can understand without playing it, i think there is still a free demo avaialable, but it is an older version.

I never seen any rdr2 or gta5 npcs trying to do half of the things you said so even if i know they are technically able to do them, it's not like they actually do a lot of it.

So yes, at least one indie studio is doing their simil euphoria animation system with self-preservation, you should be happy about it, i played more than 200 hours of their demo\early access EXCLUSIVELY for their animation system (and the music is great),nothing else.

I agree that putting advanced animation systems in an open world is far more heavier on the cpu than only rendering an arena with a couple of characters, i always agreed with this when people thought 60 fps in gta6 were easy to achieve without considering that their animation system is much heavier than a normal animation systems.

Doesnt mean that other devs cant try like rockstar does.

 

[VulcanRaven]

Has Euphoria been improved much over the years or is it still the same? I remember seeing videos how some physics are worse in GTA V compared to IV but I'm not sure if it relates to character animation.

 

[GymWolf]

Has Euphoria been improved much over the years or is it still the same? I remember seeing videos how some physics are worse in GTA V compared to IV but I'm not sure if it relates to character animation.

It is heavy on the cpu so rockstar had to gimp it on console for gta5 and rdr2, they were restored on pc via mods.

This is why i always said that a 60 fps mode is gonna worsen rockstar vision for the game unless the 60fps genius crowd in here really think that rockstar want to put a gimped version of one of their trademarks and be happy with it...

The moment you gimp something, your vision is compromised, no way to spin it.

 

[Black_Stride]

Half sword does all of that i think, maybe it miss a coupleof features but it also does stuff that rockstar games dont do, especially compared to the gimped euphoria version we had lately, i had enemies running from me because they were in danger, trying to run away, crawl away, covering their injuries with their hands, grabbing me to not fall, grabbing others to not get killed, trying to use their whole body to get up when injured, trying to walk and fight keeping into account their injuries, taking time to recover from blunt hits to the head and regain their balance, just not as good looking or perfected (and euphoria still glitch a lot aswell)

You cant really analize the game until you play the game, i only showed you that video because it was a general introduction, they dont even speak about all the features of their engine.

Worst i can say, is that since ragdoll is always on, the basic, general walking animations look a bit silly and the cutting damage system is kinda all over the place, but the game is far from done and they improve with every patch.

It is not a game that you can understand without playing it, i think there is still a free demo avaialable, but it is an older version.

I never seen any rdr2 or gta5 npcs trying to do half of the things you said so even if i know they are technically able to do them, it's not like the actually do a lot of it.

So yes, at least one indie studio is doing their simil euphoria animation system with self-preservation, you should be happy about it, i played more than 200 hours of their demo\early access EXCLUSIVELY for their animation system (and the music is great),nothing else.

I agree that putting advanced animation systems in an open world is far more heavier on the cpu than only rendering an arean woth a couple of characters, i always agreed with this when people thought 60 fps in gta6 were easy to achieve without considering that their animation system is much heavier than a normal animation systems.

Doesnt mean that other devs cant try like rockstar does.

Interesting.
Ill give the game a go.
See how the system works.
And yes it is a net positive to see more studios trying to work with digital brains instead of canned anything.

I dunno if the Star Wars games have been delisted or if they even work on modern systems.
But give them a go and just fuck around with the digital brains and DMM......tech stagnated honestly.

 

[simpatico]

Most bespoke engines outclass commercial stuff. Ubisoft engine, RE Engine, RED Engine (rip I will avenge you baby), whatever the Square engine is. These are built to accommodate the devs making them. This direction is far better for consumers.