You still haven't answered that. And I suspect you won't.
.
how am I suppose to answer something that feel shouldn't be of any problem in the first place.
You still haven't answered that. And I suspect you won't.
.
You've been dancing around the issue for many posts now.
You're not understanding me, but maybe that's my fault for not writing a more indeep reply.So criticizing gameplay, graphics, sound design, etc. is okay, but if you criticize writing, now you're trying to censor creators and are against freedom of speech? Come the fuck on.
thats not my problem, my problem is with appearances and representation, something that Anita Sarkeesian and Zoë Quinn clearly want to change completely. Why cant we have a bit of everything?
thats not my problem, my problem is with appearances and representation, something that Anita Sarkeesian and Zoë Quinn clearly want to change completely. Why cant we have a bit of everything?
That's what she's aiming for, to increase the diversity because things aren't particularly diverse right now. Even if she's wildly successful at that, the rendered butts you love so much will never go away because publishers are aware that people like you want them.
I personally dont see diversity has her main driving force, judging form her videos it would seem her goal has been to criticize and exploit rather than diversify
You're not understanding me, but maybe that's my fault for not writing a more indeep reply.
I know people hate this word but reviwers will try to be objective when analizing a game, they should look at them as the sum of their parts and judge them for what they are, what they're trying to archive and whenever they archive it, writting off a game because isolated elements of it are (problematic, sexist, not inclusive enoght, or whatever) without looking at the quality of the final product is not a good mentality, since once you find an element (that may not even represent 1% of the game) they may let it color the whole expirence
to me this would like if someone would write of an action RPG that they would otherwise like because rolling does not give any invinsibility frames, instead of you know adaptint to this other playstile, but then again I don't think most reviwers other than those at Poligon do that
thats not my problem, my problem is with appearances and representation, something that Anita Sarkeesian and Zoë Quinn clearly want to change completely. Why cant we have a bit of everything?
You're not understanding me, but maybe that's my fault for not writing a more indeep reply.
I know people hate this word but reviwers will try to be objective
You're not understanding me, but maybe that's my fault for not writing a more indeep reply.
I know people hate this word but reviwers will try to be objective when analizing a game, they should look at them as the sum of their parts and judge them for what they are, what they're trying to archive and whenever they archive it, writting off a game because isolated elements of it are (problematic, sexist, not inclusive enoght, or whatever) without looking at the quality of the final product is not a good mentality, since once you find an element (that may not even represent 1% of the game) they may let it color the whole expirence
to me this would like if someone would write of an action RPG that they would otherwise like because rolling does not give any invinsibility frames, instead of you know adaptint to this other playstile, but then again I don't think most reviwers other than those at Poligon do that
Stop trying to define "diversify" as "I see less boobies". That's not what it means.
I personally dont see diversity has her main driving force, judging form her videos it would seem her goal has been to criticize and exploit rather than diversify
what does it mean?
what does it mean?
First Zoe makes games so she should make what she wants, and her issue is harrament it has never been about what your saying, the fact you do not know the difference between the developer and the critic says to me they occupy a space in your mind labeled "interloping women".thats not my problem, my problem is with appearances and representation, something that Anita Sarkeesian and Zoë Quinn clearly want to change completely. Why cant we have a bit of everything?
what does it mean?
so people like anita sarkeesian are ok with big breasted short skirted woman in games, could you potentially link me to something that shows this?
what does it mean?
so people like anita sarkeesian are ok with big breasted short skirted woman in games, could you potentially link me to something that shows this?
I dont like them because they want to change something that I feel doesn't need to be changed
does this work?
what does it mean?
so people like anita sarkeesian are ok with big breasted short skirted woman in games, could you potentially link me to something that shows this?
what does it mean?
moving on
I dont like them because they want to change something that I feel doesn't need to be changed
does this work?
I know people hate this word but reviwers will try to be objective when analizing a game, they should look at them as the sum of their parts and judge them for what they are, what they're trying to archive and whenever they archive it, writting off a game because isolated elements of it are (problematic, sexist, not inclusive enoght, or whatever) without looking at the quality of the final product is not a good mentality, since once you find an element (that may not even represent 1% of the game) they may let it color the whole expirence
Now I actually want to play these games, someone make it happen!Fast-Twitch Muscle Fiber Black Dude
Slightly Improbable Samoan Woman
Somewhat Grounded Gay Man
Steely and Determined Trans Woman
oh good, so now your going to make some behind the curtains jab at my maturity level.
awesome.
People in this thread have been remarkably patient with you, considering.oh good, so now your going to make some behind the curtains jab at my maturity level.
awesome.
That's not how books, movies, TV shows, paintings, sculptures, tapestries, graphic novels, or any other form of art/media that exists are reviewed. Reviews are subjective assessments of an individual's experience with something. If they didn't like a specific portion of the whole product because of a part, then they had damned well better say something, lest their review be dishonest.
Why should video games be different?
Then straight up, you agree with the main objective and goals of gamergate. I'm sure you disagree with their methods, but it's the same mindset and group of people you're sharing your opinion with. It's a very unaccommodating and selfish at best and sexist at worst attitude to have.
I dont like them because they want to change something that I feel doesn't need to be changed
does this work?
Nobody's going to take away your Impossible White Guy power fantasies, delta25. They're just saying that it's okay to show other things in gaming like:
Fast-Twitch Muscle Fiber Black Dude
Slightly Improbable Samoan Woman
Somewhat Grounded Gay Man
Steely and Determined Trans Woman
It'll be okay. I promise.
Fast-Twitch Muscle Fiber Black Dude
Slightly Improbable Samoan Woman
Somewhat Grounded Gay Man
Steely and Determined Trans Woman
That's not how books, movies, TV shows, paintings, sculptures, tapestries, graphic novels, or any other form of art/media that exists are reviewed. Reviews are subjective assessments of an individual's experience with something. If they didn't like a specific portion of the whole product because of a part, then they had damned well better say something, lest their review be dishonest.
Why should video games be different?
its not diversifying that is of concern its that some of these woman want to abolish certain aspects of how woman are portrayed. Scantily clad or well conservatively dressed, it should not be up to them to decide what is the better subject matter. iirc sarkeesian went as far as to criticising Nintendo on their representation of peach, I mean really, princess peach.
thats not my problem, my problem is with appearances and representation, something that Anita Sarkeesian and Zoë Quinn clearly want to change completely. Why cant we have a bit of everything?
its not diversifying that is of concern its that some of these woman want to abolish certain aspects of how woman are portrayed. Scantily clad or well conservatively dressed, it should not be up to them to decide what is the better subject matter. iirc sarkeesian went as far as to criticising Nintendo on their representation of peach, I mean really, princess peach.
considering what, because I chooses to disagree with with the stance that a few woman in the vidoegame industry have.
I'd play the shit out of every one of those games
Nobody's going to take away your Impossible White Guy power fantasies, delta25. They're just saying that it's okay to show other things in gaming like:
Fast-Twitch Muscle Fiber Black Dude
Slightly Improbable Samoan Woman
Somewhat Grounded Gay Man
Steely and Determined Trans Woman
It'll be okay. I promise.
oh good, so now your going to make some behind the curtains jab at my maturity level.
awesome.
Slightly improbable, totally unstoppable!
because *reasons*
If anything, taking 5 seconds to look at the history of the industry thus far and what's going with it right now shoukd assure people that their beloved pixelated lumps aren't going anywhere.
The irrational fear is sad
suck-upAt the risk of sounding like a mod suck-up, Slightly Improbable Samoan Woman deserves an actual game