• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NPD Sales Results for November 2015 [Up3: Combined Hardware For PS4 + XB1 + Wii U]

aristotle

Member
I am curious what the actual CoD split was including bundles. I am not surprised that it sold better on Xbox One given how much that brand has been associated with that console for so long.

Nevertheless, it seems like MS losing the 30 day DLC window didn't hurt them.

People say this but I think you need to look at last year and why Xbone had a bigger sell-through for CoD this year. Last year, MS still had 30 day DLC window. So most CoD only players bought a Xbone because of that reason. Now that the tables have switched, most normal people won't go out and buy a brand new console for one yearly game. The Xbone users are holdovers from last year, which is the reason it sold more. I think the next Nov release will be more sided for PS4.
 

Aceofspades

Banned
So when looking at the overall sales WW for X1. What is the estimated sales numbers for X1 during 2015? It seems like MS sold less than 8m for the year. those sales are seriously low and isn't starting to be outpaced by 360 and PS3?
 

Welfare

Member
So when looking at the overall sales WW for X1. What is the estimated sales numbers for X1 during 2015? It seems like MS sold less than 8m for the year. those sales are seriously low and isn't starting to be outpaced by 360 and PS3?

Probably less than 6 million as of the end of November.
 

Game Guru

Member
First off, a model every year isn't going to work for game consoles and I highly doubt that will happen. technology is moving at a rapid pace and these companies cannot stick to traditional methods to survive. Just because it hasn't happened before doesn't mean it won't happen. With a ton of games coming out just for new gen starting next year it is time to introduce a new model to satiate the crowd that wants the extra power and wants to own the latest hardware.

I mean just look at the elite controller or the "new" 3ds, people lapped it up. You got Nintendo even advertising the fact that monster hunter runs better on the new 3ds which obviously pissed people off but guess what I don't see what a backlash would do? People that want it will get it or they will stick to the system they have. People didn't have a problem with the elite controller when it was announced but the price raised some eyebrows and people laughed it off and I see people are slowly giving in and buying it because it is very good and they like it. That's all it comes down to - choice

If there are people out there that want to play a game like witcher or blood borne at 60 fps or without any performance issues they will pay the extra 100 or 150 bucks and get a premium version of ps4. I know there are people out there that will say "get a pc" but I am positive there is a vast majority of people out there that would prefer not to put up with pc and its complexities and would rather have a console. Why do you guys think valve is trying to get into the living room?

This hypothetical premium version will probably last the next 3 years before a ps5 would come out imo.

The reason why smartphones could get away with a two-year cycle is because smartphones until recently were subsidized by the cell service carriers and those subsidized plans last for, guess what, two years! It had been the better option to just get a new smartphone every two years rather than keep the old one because of the subsidized plans. There is a reason why this did not translate to televisions, tablets, PCs, or set top boxes which are kept around until they break down or are outdated for general purposes that a typical consumer uses these devices for.
 

small44

Member
Yeah, but it won't be like that forever. PS4 is not getting 150 million units. It'll be lucky to get 100 million at its final tally

It's 99% sure that PS4 will sell over 100 millions but i agree that it have no change to top PS2 sales

First off, a model every year isn't going to work for game consoles and I highly doubt that will happen. technology is moving at a rapid pace and these companies cannot stick to traditional methods to survive. Just because it hasn't happened before doesn't mean it won't happen. With a ton of games coming out just for new gen starting next year it is time to introduce a new model to satiate the crowd that wants the extra power and wants to own the latest hardware.

I mean just look at the elite controller or the "new" 3ds, people lapped it up. You got Nintendo even advertising the fact that monster hunter runs better on the new 3ds which obviously pissed people off but guess what I don't see what a backlash would do? People that want it will get it or they will stick to the system they have. People didn't have a problem with the elite controller when it was announced but the price raised some eyebrows and people laughed it off and I see people are slowly giving in and buying it because it is very good and they like it. That's all it comes down to - choice

If there are people out there that want to play a game like witcher or blood borne at 60 fps or without any performance issues they will pay the extra 100 or 150 bucks and get a premium version of ps4. I know there are people out there that will say "get a pc" but I am positive there is a vast majority of people out there that would prefer not to put up with pc and its complexities and would rather have a console. Why do you guys think valve is trying to get into the living room?

This hypothetical premium version will probably last the next 3 years before a ps5 would come out imo.

Since a new model will be more powerful how the new games will work on the ancient model and the games that are already released on the old model need to get an graphics updates one by one.
 
So when looking at the overall sales WW for X1. What is the estimated sales numbers for X1 during 2015? It seems like MS sold less than 8m for the year. those sales are seriously low and isn't starting to be outpaced by 360 and PS3?

8 or less seems like a good bet for the entire year.

We should have a more concrete estimation if we get some updated LTD numbers from EU countries by the end of the year/beginning of next one to get a barometer of what percentage of sales the ROTW makes up for XB1.
 
So when looking at the overall sales WW for X1. What is the estimated sales numbers for X1 during 2015? It seems like MS sold less than 8m for the year. those sales are seriously low and isn't starting to be outpaced by 360 and PS3?

It will likely fall behind the 360 sometime next year. When exactly will depend on Euro numbers for 2015.
 

klee123

Member
That depends entirely on whether or not Sony can get its price down below $200. PS3 has been $200 for years now with no price drop in sight.

I think the question is how long till Sony announces the PS5.

Considering how underpowered these machines are, I have a feeling that this gen won't last too long compared to the last.
 

benny_a

extra source of jiggaflops
I think the question is how long till Sony announces the PS5.

Considering how underpowered these machines are, I have a feeling that this gen won't last too long compared to the last.
Maybe emergency announcement in the next few weeks. These sales are way too good with their current strategy, bring the $800 BOM PS5.
 

Y2Kev

TLG Fan Caretaker Est. 2009
Everyone says the machines are underpowered laptop crap and then games come out that just continually look better and better. I think they are perfectly fine.
 

Bgamer90

Banned
Just because it hasn't happened before doesn't mean it won't happen. With a ton of games coming out just for new gen starting next year it is time to introduce a new model to satiate the crowd that wants the extra power and wants to own the latest hardware.

This would be bad. There's a ton of current gen only games coming out, therefore causing people to buy current gen only consoles now. We are getting into the peak of the PS4 and Xbox One's life in terms of their game library. People who just bought a PS4 would be very upset if there's an announcement for a newer model that has more power just a year or so later.

I mean just look at the elite controller or the "new" 3ds, people lapped it up. You got Nintendo even advertising the fact that monster hunter runs better on the new 3ds which obviously pissed people off but guess what I don't see what a backlash would do? People that want it will get it or they will stick to the system they have.

People didn't have a problem with the elite controller when it was announced but the price raised some eyebrows and people laughed it off and I see people are slowly giving in and buying it because it is very good and they like it. That's all it comes down to - choice

Bad examples. Nintendo has been doing remodels for their handhelds for a long time (more than 10 years) and the Elite is just a controller (there has always been multiple options and prices for controllers). It's also a controller that will work for all Xbox One users and not just people who (say) bought the system this year.

If there are people out there that want to play a game like witcher or blood borne at 60 fps or without any performance issues they will pay the extra 100 or 150 bucks and get a premium version of ps4. I know there are people out there that will say "get a pc" but I am positive there is a vast majority of people out there that would prefer not to put up with pc and its complexities and would rather have a console. Why do you guys think valve is trying to get into the living room?

This hypothetical premium version will probably last the next 3 years before a ps5 would come out imo.

Bad idea in my opinion. I get why people (especially the more hardcore) would have no problem with laying down the extra money in ditching their old PS4 and getting a "PS4 Plus" but a new model like that would create too many questions. "What model is best for me?", "Should I even put the time/effort into making features for me game specifically for PS4 Plus if the majority of people are on the regular model?", "What's the difference? What games make better use of the Plus? Are they games I'm even interested in?", "Is my old system useless now?", etc.

Again, all questions similar to what people were saying in terms of SEGA products during the middle of the '90s. The home console space will never be ready for this. There's too much of a foundation/expectation for a successful console getting top of the line support for at least 5 years before it gets outdated by its successor.
 
i don't know what's happening these days, people construct arguments in their heads and respond to them.

Everything you said i know off, i would say i have been pointing Nintendo downwards trend for years now.

....

You made up that statement and proceeded to answer it yourself so you can sound like you are right.

However, you didn't have a problem with the statement i was responding to which said the Wii was a one time fluke for Nintendo.

ANY WAY, remember the context of the conversation was "lighting in a bottle" and "fluke". Be happy that i took the time to respond to the argument you constructed yourself.

Let's see what you said:

ISn't a bit unfair to call it luck when they did the lighting catch twice in a row?

4 times in total with very unique products. Non of the other manufacturers have been able to pull that off
, not to mention alone like Nintendo has done with some of it's products.


im not in disagreeing with what you are saying here, but which trends are you talking about?

Whatever you say bro


As for what you were responding to:

Well the sheer fact that it goes against all of the Nintendo hardware trends both before and prior to it kind of suggests that Nintendo did get lucky. They had the right product, at the right time but that market no longer cares and Wii U was stillborn.

Nintendo's home consoles have been on a downward trend since NES. Wii tapped into that lucrative but fickle casual well, and Nintendo wasn't able to sustain it, and now have got back on track with that downward trend.

I don't see the word fluke. Who's making up their own argument again?
 

small44

Member
I think the question is how long till Sony announces the PS5.

Considering how underpowered these machines are, I have a feeling that this gen won't last too long compared to the last.

Consoles was always weaker then PC nothing really changed,people who buy consoles are not only caring about graphics if it was the case they would simply play on pc.
And the fact that cross-gen games lasted so long prove that 3rd party don't want shorter gen.
 

Inuhanyou

Believes Dragon Quest is a franchise managed by Sony
I think the question is how long till Sony announces the PS5.

Considering how underpowered these machines are, I have a feeling that this gen won't last too long compared to the last.

I don't think underpoweredness relative to PC's really matters much to the longevity of these consoles. What really matters i think is that that platform holders feel they can move on with a clean break without loosing anything in the process.

With PS3 and 360, the costs associated with dropping them before 2013 would have been unfeasible considering how much money they lost trying to get them to market and then shrunk down into a form factor that allowed a healthy profit
 
Everyone says the machines are underpowered laptop crap and then games come out that just continually look better and better. I think they are perfectly fine.

I'm not even sure if the relative power of the machines even determines how long the generation lasts.

The 360 and PS3 might have been powerful when they came out but that generation went on too long regardless of the power of the machines.
 

Kyoufu

Member
Yeah, but it won't be like that forever. PS4 is not getting 150 million units. It'll be lucky to get 100 million at its final tally

I don't think PS4 will be "lucky" to reach 100 million. Seems like a given at this rate.

The question is if Xbox One can reach half of that.
 
Everyone says the machines are underpowered laptop crap and then games come out that just continually look better and better. I think they are perfectly fine.

They do look perfectly fine but that doesn't change that they are underpowered laptop crap.
 

Inuhanyou

Believes Dragon Quest is a franchise managed by Sony
I don't think PS4 will be "lucky" to reach 100 million. Seems like a given at this rate.

The question is if Xbox One can reach half of that.

Is the rate of sale really feasible for PS4 to hit 100 million by 2019?

They do look perfectly fine but that doesn't change that they are underpowered laptop crap.

^ And that is only a mental perception that people have. Who cares about the hardware if it makes games well enough that are beautiful? Just because people know the HW isn't bleeding edge doesn't mean a thing for their viability.
 

Kyoufu

Member
Is the rate of sale really feasible for PS4 to hit 100 million by 2019?

It took two years to reach 30 million and that's mostly at $399 without a lot of major IPs still to be released. There's no doubt in my mind for me.

Besides, PS2 didn't stop selling when PS3 launched.
 
Is the rate of sale really feasible for PS4 to hit 100 million by 2019?



^ And that is only a mental perception that people have. Who cares about the hardware if it makes games well enough that are beautiful? Just because people know the HW isn't bleeding edge doesn't mean a thing for their viability.

It's like a mental perception on GAF. Which matters very little I would think.
 
Everyone says the machines are underpowered laptop crap and then games come out that just continually look better and better. I think they are perfectly fine.

Some of the exclusives with different ambitions look great. Most of the multiplats suggest ultrabook crap though.
 

Inuhanyou

Believes Dragon Quest is a franchise managed by Sony
^ Why is that lucky again? :p

Some of the exclusives with different ambitions look great. Most of the multiplats suggest ultrabook crap though.

"Most of multiplats", which ones might those be?

I think a majority of these games actually made me forget how the smaller deficiencies in last gen added up to really show the difference.
 

Kyoufu

Member
PS4 still has a lot of IPs to see released on it that are proven to sell gangbusters, so I think it'll sell 100 million by PS5 launch pretty easily.

Whether they can reach Andrew House's goal of 150 million though is another debate. They'd have to sell it at $150 or less with hopes of less developed markets giving it legs to sell past the launch of new hardware. PS3 has fallen off a cliff since PS4 launched but I think that's more of a price issue than anything, as CELL has proven to be problematic.
 
I could potentially see PS4 hit near PS2 levels (130-150M) under the following conditions:

1. Steep price reductions. PS3 never had a chance at this due to how it was designed, but PS4 is a very elegant solution that will likely be extremely cheap to produce in a few years.

2. VR takes off and gives PS4 a very different second half with a completely different audience. This hinges on item #1. It has to be cost effective. If they can bundle the two together for $399 eventually, I think that hits the right pricing target.

Otherwise if they don't get some new re-invigoration from a new audience, then I think they'll settle slightly over 100M with their mainly "core" audience.
 

Game4life

Banned
I could potentially see PS4 hit near PS2 levels (130-150M) under the following conditions:

1. Steep price reductions. PS3 never had a chance at this due to how it was designed, but PS4 is a very elegant solution that will likely be extremely cheap to produce in a few years.

2. VR takes off and gives PS4 a very different second half with a completely different audience. This hinges on item #1. It has to be cost effective. If they can bundle the two together for $399 eventually, I think that hits the right pricing target.

Otherwise if they don't get some new re-invigoration from a new audience, then I think they'll settle slightly over 100M with their mainly "core" audience.

I could be wrong but I just dont see the bolded happening this gen. Next gen maybe but not this gen. PS1 level sales for PS4 is possible for sure though.
 
I could be wrong but I just dont see the bolded happening this gen. Next gen maybe but not this gen. PS1 level sales for PS4 is possible for sure though.

I could see it happening. Kinect managed to give new life to the Xbox 360. And of course there is the Wii, which launched with something new that was quite rough in terms of application, but it didn't matter because it was new and engaging.

VR could be the same thing. Needs the right software and great word of mouth though. Lots of positive impressions from PSX. I think VR is ready this gen, not next.
 
PS4 still has a lot of IPs to see released on it that are proven to sell gangbusters, so I think it'll sell 100 million by PS5 launch pretty easily.

Whether they can reach Andrew House's goal of 150 million though is another debate. They'd have to sell it at $150 or less with hopes of less developed markets giving it legs to sell past the launch of new hardware. PS3 has fallen off a cliff since PS4 launched but I think that's more of a price issue than anything, as CELL has proven to be problematic.

I think the PS4 approaching PS2 numbers is a distinct possibility. I have little doubt that we're going to see extremely low prices in the post-gen in an effort to break into developing markets in a real way - the PS2 is still the console of choice among the working class in places like the Middle East and Latin America.
 
This may sound crazy but I can see it like a Abe's Oddysey, 2D side scroller puzzler.

Anyone else?

I don't think MS would hype up Recore that much if it was that kind of game.

I think it'll be a full-on 3D game, but not necessarily a large scale AAA kind. Maybe something in the vein of Tomorrow Children/Rime.
 
Where do you guys see the XB1?

I can see it sell 50-60m in its lifetime, which isn't bad at all.

I'm guessing it'll end up in the neighborhood of 40 million. I think 60 million is far too high and 50 is a bit optimistic. To hit those numbers, it would need a pretty good boost sometime soon.
 

GKFinns

Member
I think a big chunk of VR's initial success will depend on if they get in store demo kiosks at places like Gamestop, Walmart, and Best Buy. It's definitely a device that must be experienced. It can't just be shown in trailers.
 
They do look perfectly fine but that doesn't change that they are underpowered laptop crap.

I mean, the PS2 was pretty underpowered too, and that didn't hurt it any. The console market wants bang for your buck, it doesn't want to spend more money on top of the line specs.

I'm guessing it'll end up in the neighborhood of 40 million. I think 60 million is far too high and 50 is a bit optimistic. To hit those numbers, it would need a pretty good boost sometime soon.

I'm inclined to agree. I'm bullish on the PS4 because I think it could have significant legs after the ninth gen starts, but I don't think a second-place console like the Bone can realistically have that kind of afterlife.
 

Sharpeye

Member
I think a big chunk of VR's initial success will depend on if they get in store demo kiosks at places like Gamestop, Walmart, and Best Buy. It's definitely a device that must be experienced. It can't just be shown in trailers.

VR is something that lives and dies by word and mouth, they need to get people talking about it if they want it to be the next big thing. So I agree they need as many demos as possible, heck they should set them up at arcades and have kids play games like Rigs or the shark demo.
 

Game4life

Banned
I could see it happening. Kinect managed to give new life to the Xbox 360. And of course there is the Wii, which launched with something new that was quite rough in terms of application, but it didn't matter because it was new and engaging.

VR could be the same thing. Needs the right software and great word of mouth though. Lots of positive impressions from PSX. I think VR is ready this gen, not next.

Hope so. Exciting times ahead!
 
Hope so. Exciting times ahead!

The problem with waiting on VR for next-gen is that console prices creep up again. You're starting with another $399 console + $199+ headset.

Which is why I think mid-gen, VR is ready now as PS4 gets closer to $199 pricing eventually.

The tech is ready, it's just a matter of getting the right software out there, with the right bundled price for the masses.
 
Top Bottom