• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Somebody call VH1: "The Fine Bros" are trying to trademark "reaction videos"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Einchy

semen stains the mountaintops
I'm amazed they haven't made a video saying they see everyone's point, agree they overstepped their bounds and are no longer moving forward with React World.

They need to cut their losses already.


WT4l3hE.png
 

TheJoRu

Member
Hm I feel like he did this in a hurry.

Yeah. Obviously I agree with his view, but for all the talk of "reading up" and "understanding" he doesn't understand the distinction between trademark and copyright.

What's bad is that the Fine Bros. don't seem to get that either. They own the brand, which they can rightfully trademark, but they keep bullshitting around arrogantly about their so important format, even though it's so vague and unoriginal in concept and execution that it doesn't really hold up in any sense. Even a "kids reacting to stuff"-concept isn't distinctly theirs, really. What's theirs though, with trademarks, is if someone makes a very similar video using that name or steals their logotypes or whatever. But it's such a shallow basis overall that it's so laughable and a bit disgusting they hold it to such high esteem.
 

Laz-E-Boy

Member
This whole event is really quite something. From the first video, to the various instances showing them to be hypocrites, to their "we're sorry you all aren't smart enough to get what we're doing" update vid that pretty much made things worse to the rapidly declining subscription base and increasing amount of youtubers talking about the Fine Bros business practices...


I honestly think at this point unless they make a another video stating they aren't going through with their "React World" BS and place the blame solely on themselves, their brand is dead. I don't see this as something The Fine Bros can ignore and hope everything dies down, especially if more vids mocking them or detailing past experiences with them keep popping up.

I'm not subscribed to them but I would occasionally watch their react vids and would be entertained enough. After all this though I'm just not comfortable giving my views to them.
 

Skux

Member
Unfortunately, the views will not stop coming. But we can get their attention by disliking every video they upload in the coming days.

The huge dislike bars will also attract casual subscribers to stop and think "WTF? Why does this have so many dislikes?" and hopefully find out what's been going on.
 

farisr

Member
IIRC this is a much faster rate of decline than they had yesterday at this time. Word is spreading.
Yes it is. 96k gone today already. Well on track the 115k from yesterday.
I wonder if they got a tv deal or something and tried to lock down the rights?
They've already done like 12 episodes of a show called "ReactToThat" that aired on nickelodeon at the end of 2014.
 

Kenstar

Member
If they have 30 days before their trademark is solidified why publicize it and give people a chance to fight it?

I'd go dark for 30 days and then come back after the fact 'you guys had 30 days, so sorry, its 100% official in stone now' , don't blow your load with a big advance warning, if you're going to go supervillian go big or go home
 

BY2K

Membero Americo
If they have 30 days before their trademark is solidified why publicize it and give people a chance to fight it?

I'd go dark for 30 days and then come back after the fact 'you guys had 30 days, so sorry, its 100% official in stone now' , don't blow your load with a big advance warning, if you're going to go supervillian go big or go home

They probably didn't think the public's reaction would be this negative. In their heads, everything was fine.
 

Kinsei

Banned
If they have 30 days before their trademark is solidified why publicize it and give people a chance to fight it?

I'd go dark for 30 days and then come back after the fact 'you guys had 30 days, so sorry, its 100% official in stone now' , don't blow your load with a big advance warning, if you're going to go supervillian go big or go home

Their heads were so far up their own asses that they thought people woud be chomping at the bit to become a part of REACT World.
 

rec0ded1

Member
If they have 30 days before their trademark is solidified why publicize it and give people a chance to fight it?

I'd go dark for 30 days and then come back after the fact 'you guys had 30 days, so sorry, its 100% official in stone now' , don't blow your load with a big advance warning, if you're going to go supervillian go big or go home

They did the classic villain monologue detailing their plan.
 

Eppy Thatcher

God's had his chance.
Their heads were so far up their own asses that they thought people woud be chomping at the bit to become a part of REACT World.

this is the really hilarious part. so in their own bubble about what they do and how they do it they must have honestly thought that people would be genuinely excited to become a cog in their machine for maybe a tiny cut of some cash.

Genuinely out of touch, that.
 
Another straightforward, level-headed breakdown from Foldable Human

Finally got around to watching this. Very good video. He misses on very obvious but important point, though. Licensing a trademark without quality control = "naked licensing" aka a great way to quickly lose your trademark rights. Terrible idea.

Also, he may be going a bit far with the racketeering point, but crim law ain't my thing.
 

Hasney

Member
they're not sorry

fuckers look like they're more angry then anything

They're very sorry. Sorry they used such big words as "trademark" and "licensing".

Next update will be for using the name Burger King to confuse the peasants.
100 years from now, historians will look back and realize you cannot take the internet for granted, and its not something you can fool. This thread will be a time capsule historians will look at and see how we reacted to their bullshit.

And that reaction will be distinct from the Fine Bros format.
 

farisr

Member
Also, he may be going a bit far with the racketeering point, but crim law ain't my thing.
Racketeering was actually a pretty spot on analogy.

They're basically manipulating things so that other users have to enroll into their services (aka react world network) in order to not face negative consequences by the fine bros for doing things that fine bros considers to be "their format."

Aka, give money to us to "protect" your business, otherwise your business may get taken down (by us).
 

massoluk

Banned
They probably didn't think the public's reaction would be this negative. In their heads, everything was fine.

Let me be frank, if it wasn't for the Ellen picture and testimonies of other youtubers that got their reaction videos taken down by them, I wouldn't care about this.
 

MisterHero

Super Member
New React video already has 9k dislikes.

zq1bS1p.png


EDIT: -160 per minute!!!!
EDIT: -170!!!
There was this girl taking this authoritative stance that Full House should be left in the past. And other kids were saying how people don't like change.

How about I keep my Fuller House and you keep making entertainment for today's generation, a.k.a. shitty reaction videos. Is that fair?
 

SURGEdude

Member
This is without a doubt the best thing the Fine Bros. have done. Well done, gentlemen. Very entertaining.

Agreed. If nothing else I'm hoping we'll stop having people post their lame videos all the time. I always thought they were lazy hacks but I didn't really care past that because I figured they might be decent people. To hear they're a bag of dicks just makes me feel better about thinking the product they make is lazy as fuck lowest common demonominator crap.
 

ultracal31

You don't get to bring friends.
Oh man, so many things seem even more absurd now on rewatch. Just before the time capsule thing, one of them talks about how humbling their journey has been.

If anything it's what they wanted though, we now have a time capsule of this event and came together as a community. :p
 

Addi

Member
If anything it's what they wanted though, we now have a time capsule of this event and came together as a community. :p

Haha, right.

Also, earlier in the thread people were wondering why there isn't any significant defence force for them (there seems to be one every time, no matter how deluded they might be). I think one of the reasons is that nobody identifies themselves with the Fine Bros ©™. People might be fan of the channel or some of the reactors, but those two guys? Nobody knows who they are! We rarely see them and when we first see them this is the impression they give?
 
Racketeering was actually a pretty spot on analogy.

They're basically manipulating things so that other users have to enroll into their services (aka react world network) in order to not face negative consequences by the fine bros for doing things that fine bros considers to be "their format."

Aka, give money to us to "protect" your business, otherwise your business may get taken down (by us).

I'd have to look a bit closer to see if these actions could rise to the level of satisfying the element of "racketeering activity" under civil RICO laws.
 

TAJ

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
You need to be made an example of to deter potential competition to our turf, particularly the Koreans *shudder*.

I trademarked "Koreans" a couple days ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom