• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Sony confirms PS4 Neo, [Cites smartphone cycle, waiting until enough games post E3]

thuway

Member
So, will these high end estimates for Neo's specs be enough to brute force playing ps3 games?

The issue with emulating PS3 is multifold. The biggest challenge is Cell - which has an intricate and complex architecture completely Alien to whatever is standard. The second is, it has an Nvidia GPU. It wouldn't be worth the manpower, effort, and most likely awful results.
 
Overclocked Jaguar is fine. We had 3 years of great gaming with it, and 30% boost in Neo should give us 3 more.

Jaguar would be a disappointment to the "hardcore" they are targeting. Give me the "red pill" at $499.

Does anyone from DF or Giant Bomb post here? Have they heard anything of a plan b?

It would be nice to put what spec the Neo will launch with to bed.

What make you think someone at Digital Foundry or Giant Bomb knows more than OsirisBlack? Just because you could put a name with a face? We won't know the specs until the day Sony announces them.
 

Hawk269

Member
Does anyone else feel that the following quote from Andrew House is a little odd?

“It is intended to sit alongside and complement the standard PS4,” he said. “We will be selling both [versions] through the life cycle.”

Why would someone that currently has a PS4 and decides to get a NEO would want to have both sit alongside each other? That is some weird ass wording that leads to the thought that perhaps something else is going on. If the rumors that circulated earlier suggested that the NEO was just a Super PS4 that would play all PS4 games now and future and certain games would have NEO features, why would you say it is intended to sit alongside and compliment a standard PS4?
 

Quotient

Member
Why are we so confident that scorpio is going to be 6tf? If i recall it was a single source who said they are aiming for 5-6tf - that is a large spread.
 
Does anyone else feel that the following quote from Andrew House is a little odd?

“It is intended to sit alongside and complement the standard PS4,” he said. “We will be selling both [versions] through the life cycle.”

Why would someone that currently has a PS4 and decides to get a NEO would want to have both sit alongside each other? That is some weird ass wording that leads to the thought that perhaps something else is going on. If the rumors that circulated earlier suggested that the NEO was just a Super PS4 that would play all PS4 games now and future and certain games would have NEO features, why would you say it is intended to sit alongside and compliment a standard PS4?

They compliments each other as products on store shelves(a mass market SKU and an enthusiast SKU), not your entertainment center.
 
Overclocked Jaguar is fine. We had 3 years of great gaming with it, and 30% boost in Neo should give us 3 more.

Actually fuck that, is not fine, Jaguar sucked 3 years ago and still sucks today.

Zen is much better in any sense, releasing a console with Jaguar so close to a new, much better architecture is a mistake.
 

vivftp

Member
Does anyone else feel that the following quote from Andrew House is a little odd?

“It is intended to sit alongside and complement the standard PS4,” he said. “We will be selling both [versions] through the life cycle.”

Why would someone that currently has a PS4 and decides to get a NEO would want to have both sit alongside each other? That is some weird ass wording that leads to the thought that perhaps something else is going on. If the rumors that circulated earlier suggested that the NEO was just a Super PS4 that would play all PS4 games now and future and certain games would have NEO features, why would you say it is intended to sit alongside and compliment a standard PS4?

Sit alongside each other in the market as a whole. Not literally in your entertainment center
 

Withnail

Member
I'm wondering how this all works long term...


So if every neo game has to be able to run on a ps4 ....

Then will every ps5 game need to be able to run on a neo?



And if so....your limiting yr ps5 games to, complexity wise, ps4 levels?


That is fucked....

Why would you think every PS5 game must be able to run on a Neo? o_O

My reading is that PS5 will be a new generation. Hopefully it is BC with PS4/Neo. All the iterative console stuff is purely forum speculation at this point.
 

pastrami

Member
Why are we so confident that scorpio is going to be 6tf? If i recall it was a single source who said they are aiming for 5-6tf - that is a large spread.

Console wars make people crazy. I think everyone should temper their expectations about both consoles, because some of the fan theories are getting pie in the sky territory.
 
Why would you think every PS5 game must be able to run on a Neo? o_O

My reading is that PS5 will be a new generation. Hopefully it is BC with PS4/Neo. All the iterative console stuff is purely forum speculation at this point.

I dont think so especially given Andrew House's recent comments. All three players seems to be moving to iterative hardware.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Why are we so confident that scorpio is going to be 6tf? If i recall it was a single source who said they are aiming for 5-6tf - that is a large spread.

The Gies Effect. ;)

I would only draw up this concern if Sony actually say PS5 games will run on PS4s. I don't see PS4K being forwards compatible but I do see PS5 being backwards compatible.

Agreed.

I also remember people saying the PS4 was a high-end PC in terms of specs the summer before it came out.

You'll have 4K indie 2D and low fidelity games sure. But you're kidding yourself if you think 90% of AAA games will be 4K native. You can quote me on that.

I am in agreement with you, trust me. I was just speaking about how still, they are saying no 1080p for all, even on the Neo. Even as far as saying not even 1080p/60, which I find hard to believe if it is 'Plan B'.
 

Kyoufu

Member
I'm wondering how this all works long term...


So if every neo game has to be able to run on a ps4 ....

Then will every ps5 game need to be able to run on a neo?



And if so....your limiting yr ps5 games to, complexity wise, ps4 levels?


That is fucked....

I would only draw up this concern if Sony actually say PS5 games will run on PS4s. I don't see PS4K being forwards compatible but I do see PS5 being backwards compatible.
 

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
The focus on these console CPUs is overblown anyway. Console hw had "weak" CPUs (by personal computer standards) for literally their entire history, and this was especially true for running anything resembling PC-centric codebase (which is 90% of multiplatform codebases nowadays).
If anything - PS4/XB1 CPUs are in a better position than PS2,GC and DC were relative to their time on the market (and even XB for that matter), and literally the only excuse for large increase to CPU budget is for these new iterations to give a completely transparent increase to framerate (and I thought Gaf didn't like giving 'lazy devs' excuses to be lazy).

Mind you - if marketing for any new iteration will be "buy this new more expensive console - it's exactly the same, except runs all the same games 2x(or more) as fast" - then they probably should spend extra on desktop-grade CPUs, but I somehow doubt that will be the case for any of them.

If you focused on the 300 MHz in order MIPS core and compared to what you could build a PC with back then and you benchmark general purpose code on both I think you are right to see a bigger gulf than what you are seeing when comparing the current 8 core Jaguars to a PC CPU of today, but it would make all those funny and fresh jokes about the current generation console CPU's being sold alongside kids cereals or in Happy Meals less meaningful ;).
 
Why are we so confident that scorpio is going to be 6tf? If i recall it was a single source who said they are aiming for 5-6tf - that is a large spread.

Let's be honest, a lot of us on NeoGAF take sources as the holy grail of leaked information. For all we know, MS could just release the Xbox Slim and wait it out silently.
 

Tagyhag

Member
Remember when people said the PS4 won't be doing native 1080p before launch because of UbiSoft's patch it in later, etc.? Yet over 90% of the games are native 1080p on the PS4.

Seems like we are now repeating the same thing, again.

I also remember people saying the PS4 was a high-end PC in terms of specs the summer before it came out.

You'll have 4K indie 2D and low fidelity games sure. But you're kidding yourself if you think 90% of AAA games will be 4K native. You can quote me on that.
 
Let's be honest, a lot of us on NeoGAF take sources as the holy grail of leaked information. For all we know, MS could just release the Xbox Slim and wait it out silently.

Wait out what? Regardless of what Microsoft does Sony is going to release the Neo and then the PS5 a few years later. There is no perfect moment to strike any more.
 

sun-drop

Member
So just like a PC or any console generation with cross-gen games for a couple of years?

Yeh, fucking terrible idea.


I actually don't mind the idea of the mid life span "s" version .. but IMO when the new numbered console comes out you cut the ties to the previous console's in order to prevent the horrible of like lowest common denominator holding things back sw wise.


So if I read this correctly from what is out there..


You get a PS# launch ...then 3 to 4 yeas later a PS#S edition comes out that is up specced to current day tech but is tied to the ps# level in that no games have #S exclusive features

Then, you get the next numbered PlayStation, ps#+, and that's a fresh start, clean slate, backwards compatibility not something that is necessarily there , and certainly no requirement for its games to need to run on previous gen hardware


That way we still have our traditional 8 to ten year generational leap, we just now have the option of going for a mid gen refreshing that keeps everything looking prettier till then.


Works for me.... as long as the mid cycle PS is priced with the same logic ...is this isn't a console to cater just for the 5% , those people are impractical and belong on the PC, sure they will want a console with the most expensive CPU available etc, thy will also be he types who think Sony will be putting out a refresh every year...and will abandon ship if they don't....


Neo will be priced pretty much what ps4 was at launch,they know the sweet spot. And they want people to buy now, not wait for a price drop, siting free agents possibly to be wooed by MS. There tech doesn't need to be the best this time round, because this thing is going to launch with the entirety of the ps4's software library...
 
Yeh, fucking terrible idea.


I actually don't mind the idea of the mid life span "s" version .. but IMO when the new numbered console comes out you cut the ties to the previous console's in order to prevent the horrible of like lowest common denominator holding things back sw wise.


So if I read this correctly from what is out there..


You get a PS# launch ...then 3 to 4 yeas later a PS#S edition comes out that is up specced to current day tech but is tied to the ps# level in that no games have #S exclusive features

Then, you get the next numbered PlayStation, ps#+, and that's a fresh start, clean slate, backwards compatibility not something that is necessarily there , and certainly no requirement for its games to need to run on previous gen hardware


That way we still have our traditional 8 to ten year generational leap, we just now have the option of going for a mid gen refreshing that keeps everything looking prettier till then.


Works for me.... as long as the mid cycle PS is priced with the same logic ...is this isn't a console to cater just for the 5% , those people are impractical and belong on the PC, sure they will want a console with the most expensive CPU available etc, thy will also be he types who think Sony will be putting out a refresh every year...and will abandon ship if they don't....


Neo will be priced pretty much what ps4 was at launch,they know the sweet spot. And they want people to buy now, not wait for a price drop, siting free agents possibly to be wooed by MS. There tech doesn't need to be the best this time round, because this thing is going to launch with the entirety of the ps4's software library...

Most 3rd parties are going to make games compatible with Neo whether it is required or not. Cross-gen games are a given. The only question whether Sony funded exclusives will be support Neo and "PS5" for a period of time.

So games that already work on PS4 wont have NEO mode?

Nope. It will require a patch and those patches are not mandatory. Supposedly games released in September must have a patch to support Neo mode.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
So games that already work on PS4 wont have NEO mode?

They will work, but perform/look just as they do now on the PS4 currently.

'Neo Mode' just means there is enhancements to said games from what we gather.

All games will be at least base (it should play your Bloodborne out of the box), but current games (games pre October 2016) can be patched to support enhancements. After October, I believe they have to at least be 1080p on Neo, but not perform worse than the PS4 if more bells and whistles are pushed. Which leads me to believe there is internal scaling to 4K built in (Sony X1 tech?), thus the 1080p mandate.
 

RootCause

Member
The issue with emulating PS3 is multifold. The biggest challenge is Cell - which has an intricate and complex architecture completely Alien to whatever is standard. The second is, it has an Nvidia GPU. It wouldn't be worth the manpower, effort, and most likely awful results.
Could the zen apu(PS5/6)be able to pull it off? or is the dream of playing my PS3 games years from now dead? :(
 

Humdinger

Member
Fine with me. I hope they go back to the drawing board and redesign to trump Scorpio. They probably won't, though. Probably too late at this stage to change course.
 
I also remember people saying the PS4 was a high-end PC in terms of specs the summer before it came out.

You'll have 4K indie 2D and low fidelity games sure. But you're kidding yourself if you think 90% of AAA games will be 4K native. You can quote me on that.

The original leaked specs, yeah, but I'd imagine at the rumored 6TF specs you could probably pull it off, though I'd imagine most AAA devs may instead choose to keep the rendering resolution at 1080p and increase effects/texture quality/framerate instead, since 4K TVs are still going to be a minority so they're better off using the extra power in ways that help people at 1080p.

I would only draw up this concern if Sony actually say PS5 games will run on PS4s. I don't see PS4K being forwards compatible but I do see PS5 being backwards compatible.

I'd imagine the plan is that every iteration has full backwards compatibility to the base PS4, games are required to at least support the most recent and second-most-recent iterations, and can optionally scale down farther than that. So when whatever comes after the Neo releases (which will probably be in 3-4 years, which is around when we'd get the next gen anyway in a more "normal" cycle) devs will be allowed to drop support for the base PS4, but still have to support the Neo, then the next iteration will be able to drop the Neo but still scale to the one after that, and so on. You're still only "requiring" people to buy a new machine once every 5-7 years or so just like always, you just introduce half-steps so there's always a "budget" box that can play the latest games.
 
Most 3rd parties are going to make games compatible with Neo whether it is required or not. Cross-gen games are a given. The only question whether Sony funded exclusives will be support Neo and "PS5" for a period of time.



Nope. It will require a patch and those patches are not mandatory. Supposedly games released in September must have a patch to support Neo mode.

First of all, I am starting to doubt there'll be a PS5 (in the classic sense) anytime soon.

I suppose the PS4 Neo successor will be another iteration within the PS4 ecosystem. The moment it launches they'll most likely just drop vanilla PS4 production and (forced) support, meaning that new games have to support Neo and the newest one, but not vanilla PS4 anymore.

This focus on two SKUs a the same time simplifies planning and allows (incremental) progress with every new iteration, starting with Neo's successor.
 

-Horizon-

Member
"The consumer is attuned to a different cadence of innovation in technology thanks in great part for the upgrades cadence on mobile phones or PCs."

I guess I no longer match their consumer demographic :/
 
Yea, that's too big of a pill to swallow for me, personally.

$499 is my upper-limit.

Same.

I expect $400 or $449 from Neo though. $499 is already pushing it far too high though. I would consider, but not for certain.

$400 is impulse buy for me for an upgraded PS4 though. No issue dropping that if it means what Sony is saying it means.
 

thuway

Member
Yea, that's too big of a pill to swallow for me, personally.

$499 is my upper-limit.

Prediction:

Welp, $499 sounds to be Jaguar 4.2 TF - $599 sounds to be Zen Lite 6 TF. Scorpio will be similar price point as well. Wheeeew boy. Pack it in boys, it's gonna be expensive.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
It will not be $599, at all.

Bookmark this post.

$499 max if up-spec'ed from early leaks.

Early leaks said $399 with Jaguar 4.2TF, $499 with difference CPU, and the guy kept talking about a different CPU like they were leaning that way mostly.

I doubt the $499 one would be Jaguar 4.2TF .
If we go by old rumors the 499 one was with the better cpu and that is before we knew about AMD new card price .

Yep.

And Polaris can be clocked to 5.5TF with GDDR5 as it is in the RX 480.
 
I guess I no longer match their consumer demographic :/

You are which is why they will require full support of the base PS4 for the foreseeable future.

Prediction:

Welp, $499 sounds to be Jaguar 4.2 TF - $599 sounds to be Zen Lite 6 TF. Scorpio will be similar price point as well. Wheeeew boy. Pack it in boys, it's gonna be expensive.

Are you backtracking? A little while ago you seemed to believe $499 was Zen Lite(which is the only thing that makes sense). $499 is for Jaguar is a joke.
 
Prediction:

Welp, $499 sounds to be Jaguar 4.2 TF - $599 sounds to be Zen Lite 6 TF. Scorpio will be similar price point as well. Wheeeew boy. Pack it in boys, it's gonna be expensive.

I doubt the $499 one would be Jaguar 4.2TF .
If we go by old rumors the 499 one was with the better cpu and that is before we knew about AMD new card price .
 
Prediction:

Welp, $499 sounds to be Jaguar 4.2 TF - $599 sounds to be Zen Lite 6 TF. Scorpio will be similar price point as well. Wheeeew boy. Pack it in boys, it's gonna be expensive.

$499 would have to be more than 4.2 TF.

$400 and I say 4.2 TF if not more.

$500 is too much for only 4.2 TF, I doubt Sony would do that.
 
Top Bottom