So just like a PC or any console generation with cross-gen games for a couple of years?
Yeh, fucking terrible idea.
I actually don't mind the idea of the mid life span "s" version .. but IMO when the new numbered console comes out you cut the ties to the previous console's in order to prevent the horrible of like lowest common denominator holding things back sw wise.
So if I read this correctly from what is out there..
You get a PS# launch ...then 3 to 4 yeas later a PS#S edition comes out that is up specced to current day tech but is tied to the ps# level in that no games have #S exclusive features
Then, you get the next numbered PlayStation, ps#+, and that's a fresh start, clean slate, backwards compatibility not something that is necessarily there , and certainly no requirement for its games to need to run on previous gen hardware
That way we still have our traditional 8 to ten year generational leap, we just now have the option of going for a mid gen refreshing that keeps everything looking prettier till then.
Works for me.... as long as the mid cycle PS is priced with the same logic ...is this isn't a console to cater just for the 5% , those people are impractical and belong on the PC, sure they will want a console with the most expensive CPU available etc, thy will also be he types who think Sony will be putting out a refresh every year...and will abandon ship if they don't....
Neo will be priced pretty much what ps4 was at launch,they know the sweet spot. And they want people to buy now, not wait for a price drop, siting free agents possibly to be wooed by MS. There tech doesn't need to be the best this time round, because this thing is going to launch with the entirety of the ps4's software library...