Nah, back then it was "a policy thing". The text in the OP is only a fleshed out version of "It's a policy thing".
That combined with Dunham's statement that they have just now finished the ability to have cross console multiplayer also puts the older threads to shame, in the sense that Psyonix wasn't just sitting around twiddling their thumbs waiting for Sony. It's entirely likely that they wanted to get it actually functional first before moving ahead with it. The chance of Sony refusing RL cross play is extremely low.
One of the developers commented here weeks ago, that a patch already made crossplay between all platforms possible. They only need to hit that switch.
There is no additional work required to enable full cross play. It's a policy thing at this point. The build we're patching in today has all the tech required for any platform to play with any other.
Care to elaborate? There is a great deal of evidence of Sony having no policy against cross-platform multiplayer (ie a significant amount of cross-platform multiplayer games actually exist on Playstation), and also evidence of MS having a specific policy ruling out cross-platform multiplayer outside of Xbox Live (ie devs who have explicitly stated MS prevented this).
Perhaps I could have worded it more clearly.
Yes Sony are now working out their policies for how cross-platform multiplayer involving Xbox Live can be implemented.
But Sony decided that their policy on whether cross-platform multiplayer was allowed years ago. Their policy was "yes it is allowed".
Yes I imagine they'll want to test it before it goes live.
My post was somewhat satirising people having made this claim previously.
At a policy and ideological level Sony have been open to this for far longer than MS.
People suggesting that the ball was in Sony's court were implying that they had been the one holding it up all these years, when it was clearly Microsoft.
Read the actual quotes here. Sony have already said they will allow this, but there are a variety of technical details they need to ensure they've accounted for.
When Microsoft made the decision to no longer forbid cross platform multiplayer, they had time to get their policies and procedures in place before announcing it, now Sony is doing the same. But Sony were always in principal open to cross-platform play.
Ball's in Sony's court.
What are the benefits of this ?
I mean there are tons of players on both consoles and PC , so no need to sum more.
Unless you could play against a friend with other console do not see the plus if this
This is my view as well tbh. I can see how it'd be great for niche games with struggling populations... but if there are plenty of other people, then I'd rather not not have my games populated with what would feel like really intelligent bots.
This is my view as well tbh. I can see how it'd be great for niche games with struggling populations... but if there are plenty of other people, then I'd rather not not have my games populated with what would feel like really intelligent bots.
What Psyonix are attempting to do is consolidate everyone into a single player pool - that doesnt necessarily affect the scenario you are considering as theres no universal party system to easily organise yourself.I feel like this won't happen because Sony is not going to want to lose the network effect of people buying PlayStations to play with their friends. So a person who might lean towards buying an Xbox but has friends on PSN would go ahead and buy that Xbox if they knew they could play cross-network. It's a cynical view, but I'm sure they are considering the competitive aspects. Sony has been fine with PC cross network play. Supporting a rival console might be going too far for them.
It's an inarguably great proposition for gamers. Though Dunham notes that the corporate machinery and "politics" are still there. That's what I am basing my take on.
Because it wasn't that simple to know who it was when neither party publicly lists their requirements to cross-play and both where "open" to the idea of cross-play and that still stands. Saying it was in "X" court at the time was pure speculation and some being misguided by MS's PR.A gargantuan amount of people here kept scoffing at this before.
That's just a silly thing to say. The ball is in Sony court for RL for anything else it is unknown. MS like Sony are both "open" to cross-play and will allow it where requirements are met. i.e For FFXIV and DC Universe Online the ball is in MS's court.The ball is NOW in Sony's court.
No one is saying that they have been holding this up for years.
But NOW, in 2016, the ball is in Sony's court.
We can all agree with 2:1 winning ratio, MS didn't want it-but now they do, etc....
But again, the ball is NOW in Sony's court...
Will benefit the Xbox user base with a large influx of players... so
i personally don't think this is beneficial to sony as much as it is for MS.
Sony wants people to pick up their console to play with friends that are already invested in ps4 since they are leading in install base. By taking away the install base advantage, which benefits MS, gamers are not forced to pick up the ps4. they can just buy the game on xb1 and play with their friends on ps4 and this is very good as a consumer. As far as Sony is concerned there are people out there picking up a ps4 version or a ps4 to play with their friends or even buying multiple copies to play on both so as a business they may not be too eager to get this implemented
That's exactly the policy thing talked about in the quoted comment above.
i personally don't think this is beneficial to sony as much as it is for MS.
Sony wants people to pick up their console to play with friends that are already invested in ps4 since they are leading in install base. By taking away the install base advantage, which benefits MS, gamers are not forced to pick up the ps4. they can just buy the game on xb1 and play with their friends on ps4 and this is very good as a consumer. As far as Sony is concerned there are people out there picking up a ps4 version or a ps4 to play with their friends or even buying multiple copies to play on both so as a business they may not be too eager to get this implemented
Given how painful it is for them to make any sort or change or update to their network and bizarre things like being unable to find a way to let people change their PSN IDs, I'm not holding out hope this will happen anytime soon
I don't want a future of cross-console play, the parity clauses would melt minds.
This has nothing to do with PSN changes. Sony just needs to say yes and Psyonix hits a switch.
i personally don't think this is beneficial to sony as much as it is for MS.
Sony wants people to pick up their console to play with friends that are already invested in ps4 since they are leading in install base. By taking away the install base advantage, which benefits MS, gamers are not forced to pick up the ps4. they can just buy the game on xb1 and play with their friends on ps4 and this is very good as a consumer. As far as Sony is concerned there are people out there picking up a ps4 version or a ps4 to play with their friends or even buying multiple copies to play on both so as a business they may not be too eager to get this implemented
They mention asking for updates often in the article, i dont think its that simpleHey devs, just pick up the phone and talk to Sony, they're approachable.
Hey devs, just pick up the phone and talk to Sony, they're approachable.
So basically, the ball has been in Sony's court for a long time.
What was I reading last time about MS having some policies in place that would make Sony hesitant?
What?
I'm not really sure what they would gain by not allowing this.
You can't party up between PC and PS4 and play ranked games (which is what matters to "serious" players) anyway, all you can do is play friendly matches on private servers. If you want to get some real action going you're gonna need to be on the same system.
What are the benefits of this ?
I mean there are tons of players on both consoles and PC , so no need to sum more.
Unless you could play against a friend with other console do not see the plus if this
Imagine both Sony and Microsoft allowing cross-console play, do you really think one or the other would allow their competitor to have the "better" version?
They mention asking for updates often in the article, i dont think its that simple
Hope Sony allows this, would love it for CoD etc aswell.
Yet. You'll be able to if this becomes the norm, devs will just make in game friends lists or something similar. This is only the first stage to a true unified playerbase
it's just bigger matchmaking pools. Not as big a deal as people are making it imo.
I meant from the technical side.Ehhh it's more than just them saying yes though. They want to get everything in order legally and officially because when they say yes other companies are going to want information on it as well. This pretty much lined up with what I figured was going on. Sony wants to get all the paperwork in order but have indicated to the company that they will approve the measure. Also confirms that Sony didn't have any notice ahead of time that this was in development on RL.
Imagine both Sony and Microsoft allowing cross-console play, do you really think one or the other would allow their competitor to have the "better" version?
What are the benefits of this ?