• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Nintendo Patent Application - Accessory and Information Processing System

But it also could in a way that means battery doesn't drain when combined, so potentially you could have a remote controller with as battery and physical OFF switch, that just works regardless when it's connected via the optics.

I don't think you even need a physical off switch, as long as the device it's connected to can recognize that the controller doesn't need to be connected via Bluetooth anymore and can kill it.
 

georly

Member
They didn't do too badly with the nunchuk and wii motion+, although maybe they're exceptions...

Exceptions to the rule, mainly because nunchucks were bundled and eventually every remote had motion plus built in (and a couple games that required it had the accessory or the remote bundled with it - sports resort, skyward sword, fling smash, etc).

They got extra TLC from nintendo unlike most other peripherals.

Seems too complex for the average consumer

Clip-on buttons are too complex?
 
But it also could in a way that means battery doesn't drain when combined, so potentially you could have a remote controller with as battery and physical OFF switch, that just works regardless when it's connected via the optics.

This is definitely possible too, but the way that the title and description refer to accessories and attachments make me think of extra optional attachments.

But yeah if they want to use it this makes sense for the main controllers too.
 

TunaLover

Member
Exceptions to the rule, mainly because nunchucks were bundled and eventually every remote had motion plus built in (and a couple games that required it had the accessory or the remote bundled with it - sports resort, skyward sword, fling smash, etc).

They got extra TLC from nintendo unlike most other peripherals.



Clip-on buttons are too complex?
I mean all the talk about image projection, and other suff from the patent.
 
GPS receiver... Would this link to people's phones to get a signal or be all on the device?

Tell me if I'm crazy, but what if, Nintendo make the portable device always online? Nothing taxing, just at the level of mobile apps. There wouldn't be a subscription, instead a lot of microtransactions in some of the games that cover the network costs overall.

Man a couple cider cans and I'm already spouting crap 😌
 
I don't think you even need a physical off switch, as long as the device it's connected to can recognize that the controller doesn't need to be connected via Bluetooth anymore and can kill it.
Depends what was method the recognition process is! I thought it demonstrated what I was saying better, it might not need a physical off switch but just means zero power drain instead of tiny power drain.
 

G.ZZZ

Member
This is so gonna be a trainwreck FeelsGoodMan

Can't wait for that downgraded Zelda with shitty controls FeelsGoodMan
 

Oregano

Member
Nintendo has had two very similar/related patents in real time. One was the puck which showed you docking a phone and projecting an image and the other was a tablet with IR sensors on the side which showed detection or orientation and could interact with physical objects(it looked like a mouse amiibo). I'll see if I can find them.

Also projection and IR scanner would allow Nintendo to do touch controls on a home console without a second screen potentially.

EDIT:

Puck thread
Tablet with sensors thread
 

Vena

Member
This is so gonna be a trainwreck FeelsGoodMan

Can't wait for that downgraded Zelda with shitty controls FeelsGoodMan

Some of you are clearly not electrical engineers or involved in fields from which you can appreciate the ingenuity involved here.
 

Sciortino

Member
It's seriously time they finally reveal this thing because I don't know what to think anymore when I look at all these patents.
 

J@hranimo

Banned
It's seriously time they finally reveal this thing because I don't know what to think anymore when I look at all these patents.

I think the device could be pretty awesome and that we're probably still missing some key elements to the platform.

September is looking like the time of reveal. Hold on just a bit longer!
 
I can only imagine, if theres a portable touch screen form factor, Blizzard should totally port Hearthstone to this thing for launch
 

Peterc

Member
I wonder when detaching the controller if you could rotate the device sideway and plug it in again so you can play in portrait style
fig12z4pce.jpg
 
Some of you are clearly not electrical engineers or involved in fields from which you can appreciate the ingenuity involved here.

As a budding electrical engineer I'm practically kicking myself on how well thought out this could be at saving costs. This could be the thing they wanted to hide levels of disbelief.
 

Aostia

El Capitan Todd
I mean all the talk about image projection, and other suff from the patent.

Consumers dont need to read long complex and boring patent application but just turn the device in and play.

Wii patent application were complex too but man if the wiimote wasnt immediate
 

Eradicate

Member
I wonder when detaching the controller if you could rotate the device sideway and plug it in again so you can play in portrait style
fig12z4pce.jpg

I believe it could be possible if they wanted to! From the patent:

Note that in other embodiments, the operation device 20 may be allowed to be attached to other positions of the portable device 1.

What about this:


Nobody is talking about it, but what could this mean?


predictables-hand-projection-set-468x472.jpg


iwatch-concept-005.jpg


Something like this?:p

...That is really cool to think about! Pico projectors are getting cheaper and cheaper!

Right, which is why I said this isn't necessarily a concept for the controllers themselves- it's more likely a concept for attachments. The normal controllers can have batteries and bluetooth capabilities which let them talk to the console, and can be removed such that these attachments can be attached for other purposes (different control schemes, user customization, etc.).

Exactly! There are a lot of configurations!

As described above, the embodiment above can be applied to a portable device, such as a mobile telephone, a smartphone or a portable game device, and to an accessory (attachment) that can be attached to such a portable device, with the aim of providing an accessory with a simple configuration.

Attachment to an attachment to a portable device even!
 

Cuburt

Member
Circle Pad Pro?

It sounds like the Eurogamer article but the details seem to contradict what Eurogamer said about 2 player input and doesn't even seem like it would work for 1 player docked play like some speculated.

This might be what Nintendo mentioned about creating a controller shell for mobile and if this is what Eurogamer's info comes from, it makes me doubt their NX info even more about detachable controllers.

I could imagine Nintendo getting traditional games on mobile and needing an attachment for that.
 

maxcriden

Member
Is there any summary of what we've gleaned from these patents in layman's terms as of yet? ☺

Edit: reading lobdale's article now!
 
Circle Pad Pro?

It sounds like the Eurogamer article but the details seem to contradict what Eurogamer said about 2 player input and doesn't even seem like it would work for 1 player docked play like some speculated.

This might be what Nintendo mentioned about creating a controller shell for mobile and if this is what Eurogamer's info comes from, it makes me doubt their NX info even more about detachable controllers.

I could imagine Nintendo getting traditional games on mobile and needing an attachment for that.

So I'll be playing Breath of the Wild on my iPhone next March?
 

Vena

Member
As a budding electrical engineer I'm practically kicking myself on how well thought out this could be at saving costs. This could be the thing they wanted to hide levels of disbelief.

Indeed this is a genius way to cut costs AND reduce exposed circuitry or ports which is very important for something that seemingly can be removed on a whim and fast/easily put back. Moreover, depending on the integration of the mirrors/dummy switches for the IR you could even incorporate analog controls into this based on %-radiation or %-distribution of the light cone of the sensor. The proximity would make this have identical latency to just copper wire as well, if not better since the only negotiation is "the speed of light" and a processing unit which is no different from a standard board processing unit to understand a directional input, you've just replaced pure electronic signals with optoelectronics.

Also next to no battery drain on the control platform.

I'd hide the shit out of this until my patents were secured and my product was ready to go, haha. You can save a lot of money and energy expenditure with this move, allowing you to cut costs and invest your total power draw elsewhere.
 
So I guess it'll all come down to how the "processor center piece" costs. Whether that's just the tablet/screen or a block with sensors and radios to connect to the console. Either way, it's crazy that this could potentially allow a Wii U gamepad like interface for potentially cheaper
 
What about this:


Nobody is talking about it, but what could this mean?


predictables-hand-projection-set-468x472.jpg


iwatch-concept-005.jpg


Something like this?:p

The quality would be total garbage, making it a moot point.
Think of those shitty Chinese iPhone projectors you can buy off Ebay.
Also I pray to the gaming gods that it looks nothing like the monstrosity in this patent photo.
DZDH4JD.png
 
This seems like a very smart and elegant idea after reading the patent more carefully.

I think the trick will be devising a way to connect the controllers to the central device in a way that's really smooth and feels modern.

Please don't let it involve clamps.
 

Vena

Member
I think the trick will be devising a way to connect the controllers to the central device in a way that's really smooth and feels modern.

Please don't let it involve clamps.

You can easily use small latch pins or even neatly hidden magnets for this. Magnets give you a crisp snap and easy removal too.
 

Eliseo

Member
Indeed this is a genius way to cut costs AND reduce exposed circuitry or ports which is very important for something that seemingly can be removed on a whim and fast/easily put back. Moreover, depending on the integration of the mirrors/dummy switches for the IR you could even incorporate analog controls into this based on %-radiation or %-distribution of the light cone of the sensor. The proximity would make this have identical latency to just copper wire as well, if not better since the only negotiation is "the speed of light" and a processing unit which is no different from a standard board processing unit to understand a directional input, you've just replaced pure electronic signals with optoelectronics.

Also next to no battery drain on the control platform.

I'd hide the shit out of this until my patents were secured and my product was ready to go, haha. You can save a lot of money and energy expenditure with this move, allowing you to cut costs and invest your total power draw elsewhere.

No wonder Nintendo kept things hidden so much.
 

The Boat

Member
I think the trick will be devising a way to connect the controllers to the central device in a way that's really smooth and feels modern.

Please don't let it involve clamps.
It needs to be sturdy enough not to disconnect or dislodge, clamps or something similar might be the only solution. Maybe a sliding insert. Usability beats smooth and modern.


You can easily use small latch pins or even neatly hidden magnets for this. Magnets give you a crisp snap and easy removal too.
Using only magnets would make it easy for the attachment to accidentally disconnect. I think going with something simple and reliable is the best option.
 
So, does this patent contradict Eurogamer's article in any way?

Does this really suggest it won't hook up to a television or is that just speculation?
 

KingSnake

The Birthday Skeleton
This pretty much answers the question "why would Nintendo hide the NX from competitors". Very ingenuous engineering.
 
It needs to be sturdy enough not to disconnect or dislodge, clamps or something similar might be the only solution. Maybe a sliding insert. Usability beats smooth and modern.



Using only magnets would make it easy for the attachment to accidentally disconnect. I think going with something simple and reliable is the best option.

I was actually just thinking about a sliding insert with a magnet at the entrance. So if you slid it down, the top of both parts would connect when the slider hits the bottom. Maybe a magnet release button to dislodge it.
 
So, does this patent contradict Eurogamer's article in any way?

Does this really suggest it won't hook up to a television or is that just speculation?

It actually makes specific allowances for the attachments to possibly have electrical components (allowing them to theoretically operate independently) and connect to other devices besides the portable
(like...a TV dock, although that isn't specified - really, this could be abstracted to refer to pretty much anything)
.

Note that it is not necessary that the operation device 20 be a device including no electrical configuration. In other embodiments, the operation device 20 may include an electrical configuration such as an electronic circuit. For example, the operation device 20 may include a communication section for communicating with another information processing device different from the portable device 1 to which it is attached. The operation device 20 may be electrically connected to the portable device 1, and may for example include a speaker for receiving a sound signal from the portable device 1 to output sounds. Even in the case of an electrical configuration as described above, it is possible according to the embodiment above to simplify the configuration of the operation device regarding the configuration for the operation section.
 
Can someone give a summary of what this means?

I have trouble reading patents, and people are saying how amazing it is but I have no idea what it is
 
Top Bottom