Hmmm... Can't complain about options.
You could. I recall somebody previously made a thread complaining about the mere possibility of a console offering graphical and performance options.
Hmmm... Can't complain about options.
Wow.Now imagine ND trying to take U4 to 60 fps.Seriously,Sony fucked it up going with those shitty Jaguars again.- 1080p high framerate, the game running at >45 FPS targeting 60
What a joke.
I find it rather weird. Seeing the PC benchmarks, I wonder at what framerate it really is going to perform. A 980ti can play it at 4K/31fps, so the graphics are going to be turned down or the framerate will be very unstable.
"Options" can paralyse me from even bothering with a game. Knowing you can only have one of three options and you have to prioritise it is the sort of multiple choice I can't be arsed with in CONSOLE gaming. I just want the as intended experience and away we go.
Come on, this isn't rocket science. If you have a 4K TV, chose 4K mode. If you want prettiest graphics, choose 30FPS mode. If you want a higher frame rate, chose 60FPS capped mode. It's not that hard, and I bet it will suggest a mode when you first turn on the game."Options" can paralyse me from even bothering with a game. Knowing you can only have one of three options and you have to prioritise it is the sort of multiple choice I can't be arsed with in CONSOLE gaming. I just want the as intended experience and away we go.
Given the GPU in this is basically a RX 480, it can do nice things, I guess in 4k30.
Ughh this smells of PC gaming.
Who on earth wants a frame rate flapping around between 45-60fps on a 60hz screen?? Gross.
This is how every game needs to manage it now.
Yup. Consoles should have had these options forever.
- 4K mode, the big resolution and developers made the optimal choices
- 1080p high framerate, the game running at >45 FPS targeting 60
- 1080p bells and whistles, 30 FPS locked with every processing technique pushed to the max
It's not the Jaguars which is the problem. The GPU just isn't powerful enough.Wow.Now imagine ND trying to take U4 to 60 fps.Seriously,Sony fucked it up going with those shitty Jaguars again.
It's not the Jaguars which is the problem. The GPU just isn't powerful enough.
the only reason this is possible with NEO is because of its iterative nature. Consoles would never have had these options before regardless because of the fixed hardware aspect
“Sony officially unveiled their new gaming console today – the PlayStation 4 Pro – available November 10, 2016. Rise of the Tomb Raider: 20 Year Celebration was featured at their New York event, showcased as one of the first 4K games on console. Rise of the Tomb Raider: 20 Year Celebration launches on October 11, 2016, and will be compatible with the PlayStation 4 Pro.
With the PlayStation 4 Pro’s additional horsepower, we’ve been able to add graphical enhancements such as improved reflections, more dynamic foliage, and detailed tessellation. These features heighten the experience and further immerse players in Lara’s first Tomb Raiding expedition.
Rise of the Tomb Raider: 20 Year Celebration on the PlayStation 4 Pro will include three modes: 4K Resolution, High Framerate, and Enriched Visuals, allowing you to customize your experience. 4K Resolution displays the game in 4K Resolution, on supported 4K TVs, in 30 fps. High Framerate pushes the framerate above 30 fps at 1080p with a target of 60 fps for an even smoother gameplay experience. Enriched Visuals enhances graphical features of the game for a lusher and more realistic experience, in 1080p at 30 fps.”
This should have been said during the conference as an example of what devs can do with different resolutions. What a bad show.
Older consoles could've had it, they just virtually never do. Can always have multiple settings on consoles e.g. like TLOU had 2 modes for different FPS, and one has higher resolution shadows for example on PS4.
Even going back to PS1 era there were games like G-Police where you could modify draw distance to have a better or worse framerate I think.
It's very uncommon, but nothing prevents it really from happening even on single iteration generations. Most people just wouldn't even care either anyway.
Official 4K PS4 Pro trailer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOg9eiQsEBM
If you feel the trailer deserves its own thread...I can do it
So they will have a 1080p 60 fps version.
This is how every game needs to manage it now.
Dips into the 45s? The fuck?
Official 4K PS4 Pro trailer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOg9eiQsEBM
If you feel the trailer deserves its own thread...I can do it
Both are a problem. The Jaguars are slower than equivalent-clocked ARM cores, which is highly absurd in a home console. The GPU however was already barely adequate for 1080p and now they are going to tell it to render 4 times more pixels which is what 4K is with only twice the overall GPU power. Yeah, no. That's not happening.
This is how every game needs to manage it now.
Both are a problem. The Jaguars are slower than equivalent-clocked ARM cores, which is highly absurd in a home console. The GPU however was already barely adequate for 1080p and now they are going to tell it to render 4 times more pixels which is what 4K is with only twice the overall GPU power. Yeah, no. That's not happening.
But lol@ north of 45.
Just lock it at 60 damn it. Put some settings down. You already have the 30fps being the bell and whistles mode. It's basically a "Graphics mode" or "Gameplay mode".
Official 4K PS4 Pro trailer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOg9eiQsEBM
If you feel the trailer deserves its own thread...I can do it