• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Digital Foundry: Nintendo Switch CPU and GPU clock speeds revealed

Status
Not open for further replies.

BreakAtmo

Member
On the bright side you'll be getting the full output of nintendo's developers on one system instead of having to buy two. Other than that I wish nintendo could just take on sony and microsoft directly without having to resort to gimmicks which ultimately make their consoles pricier without being able to even touch the graphics performance of the other consoles.

Yeah, I'm actually very excited for that. Makes things easier on everyone.
 

ViciousDS

Banned
If this is sold at the 199$/€ price point, everything is good.
If more expensive, Nintendo can rot in hell.

That's it basically in a nutshell.


For everybody who expected PS4 like graphics on the go with a handheld pricepoint.. -> dream on...

pretty much all we have left. If this thing is over $200 they can rightfully fuck off.
 

Mistouze

user-friendly man-cashews
Still a healthy jump from the WiiU even in portable mode. Hopefully its battery life is in the ballpark of the 3DS.
 
I hope you're a part of a minority, because I wanted Switch to be main system. I hate PS4 to guts and I can't wait to replace with something better. And if that's not happening I'm planning to get a religion and pray my ass of for Nintendo to bring a brand new handheld in 2018 as a 3DS successor. With this specs, Switch is DOA.

The number of people buying Nintendo consoles as their main/only platform has to be incredibly small these days. I think you have unrealistic expectations.
 
Next Gen starts with the Switch!
Or so I was told.
If people keep denying Switch is a new generation, I demand Breath of the Wild become eligible for 2010 Game of the Year.
Aostia said:
the absence of comments from Matt and NateDrake or even from Laura/Emily is telling.
Ehh, I think it's mostly telling us that it's been under an hour since this broke.
 
Definitely disappointing if true, but I'll reserve judgment until the reveal and specs are 100% confirmed. DF is more reliable than most, but we also thought that about Eurogamer (who were certain Pascal was the chip architecture) and Venture Beat (with their GFLOP calculations that aren't consistent with DF's).

We will see. Nintendo is able to squeeze a lot out of weaker hardware and I have no doubt their lineup will look and run great, but western third parties will seriously struggle with current gen ports if these DF specs are accurate.
 
the absence of comments from Matt and NateDrake or even from Laura/Emily is telling.

Dude it's been an hour and probably Laura is the only one whose time zone is at a good hour.

Speaking of:

Laura Kate Dale said:
To those asking about this Eurogamer Switch spec leak, I'll say this lines up with what I've heard from 1 source.

With only a single source I was not confident to report it myself but knowing Eurogamer's sources are distinct from mine, I'll back them up.

Basically, if Eurogamer have heard the same info as me, independantly from my sources, there's a good chance those specs are solid.

Basically expect a relatively modern powered console when docked, but when portable games will need to run a LOT less intensive.

It remains to be see how easy optimisation for handheld will be, can it be just resolution drop, and how does that effect 3rd party support.

Having discussed my sources with them in the past, I am confident my sources and EG's are separate and distinct.

Laura Kate Dale ‏@LaurakBuzz 8m8 minutes ago

Basically, EG being confident enough to run it, and my independant source, makes me confident enough that it's likely accurate.

Now, worth noting if it's USB-C as I've said, a beefy power bank and you could maybe play full power while portable.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Sub 200 price incoming ? Otherwise those specs doesnt make sense lol.

This is exactly what the rumors stated over the past couple years. They wanted to go for a pricepoint that would encourage impulse buying.
 

z0m3le

Banned
It doesn't. The CPU is better, the RAM is better, but the GPU is weaker than Wii U on paper and no more than 10% faster in practice. It's just a Wii U with better hardware that can play Wii U-level games with newer effects (not necessarily better) at 720p on the go and 1080p at home.

No, it's still 50% faster in single precision than Wii U with 256 cuda cores, it is ~3x faster in raw fp16 compute, but of course you'd draw back, and that is when on the go, docked, even with these clocks, it is still ~400gflops single precision and 786gflops fp16 (again not what you'd be able to accomplish in a game, but gives some idea of max performance at this lower end. Lastly Maxwell still has a heavy advantage flop to flop with GCN, this means that the portable in single precision is still comparable to ~220 fp32 gflops, and 440 fp16 gflops when compared (favorably to GCN) that of course is all just depending on dev wizardry and isn't a hard number as you'd estimate that you'd actually only get ~300gflops (compared to gcn) for a game using fp16.

I don't see how you'd need to actively cool this device though, it really doesn't make sense if this only has 2SM, it is now much more likely that it has 3SM or even 4SM to require the fans and vent. The low clock on the CPU is also off LCGeek's rumor, which makes this odd again.
 

Vic

Please help me with my bad english
There's only one, tiny possible saving grace left.

Since the Switch's GPU is made by Nvidia, it's not going to have the same architecture and features that the Wii-U's GPU, made by AMD, is. Because of that, we "may" get a decent bump that should at the very least, be better than the mere overclocking of the GC chips that were present in the Wii.
Indeed, but even then...
 

wildfire

Banned
If handheld clock speeds are so low, then why the heck is the screen 720p? It should's been 540p like a bunch of people originally suggested.

Agree.

It still would've been great as a 540p handheld. But these clock speeds are so low I'm disappointed in both hardware configurations for now.
 

LordOfChaos

Member
As things stand, CPU clocks are halved compared to the standard Tegra X1, but it's the GPU aspect of the equation that will prove more controversial. Even while docked, Switch doesn't run at Tegra X1's full potential. Clock-speeds are locked here at 768MHz, considerably lower than the 1GHz found in Shield Android TV, but the big surprise from our perspective was the extent to which Nintendo has down-clocked the GPU to hit its thermal and battery life targets. That's not a typo: it really is 307.2MHz - meaning that in portable mode, Switch runs at exactly 40 per cent of the clock-speed of the fully docked device.

RIP Tegra X1 as the minimum speculated baseline.

Still not as bad as WUST I guess :p
 
I think people are shocked because this is worse than the Nvidia Shield. Never expected that they would basically downgrade the hardware from that standard. Well Nontendo gonna Nintendo I guess.
 

DieH@rd

Banned
I expected that SoC will stick very closely to the Tegra X1 package, but clocks put that well below what Shield tablet can do. At least battery life will be longer.

Ok, next question.

Can it run DQXI (PS4 version)?

This HW can run everything... but optimization will be a bitch. This is much weaker hardware than PS4 [even more so in portable mode]. Expect many games to render in sub-720p and 30fps.
 
This is good news in that it will accelerate Nintendo as as software only company. I'll be happy with Mario on a Sony system.

This fucking hyperbole is disgusting as fuck.
When we saw the first video of the Switch everybody was happy and at least everybody thought we would get a portable Wii U and that would be a pretty big leap over the 3DS.
The fans were happy with what they saw im the reveal trailer but suddenly everything is shit because of some specs, outside of NeoGAF nobody cares for. Thats the problem with some of you. You guys think the peoplr in the real world would care for such stuff...but they only care for games. If they lool good, then they will accept the device. And Nintendo is in the position to sell a weak home console as a fucking strong handheld. Well one side would always be dissapointed but that some of you are not capable of thinking like an adult is very strange to say the least.
Nintendo has showed the concept and that actually sold many people on the console...
And if they create some hype at january 13th this thing will sell well and Mario have never been running around on a Playstation, where the audience for such kind of games isnt there anyway.
 

Zoon

Member
Most people were expecting this to exceed the Tegra X1 which became available in 2015. It doesn't.
But Nintendo hasn't made any steps to make people expect that.

Also, I'm really curious as what the battery life is when undocked. Personally, I'd be fine with 2-3 hours.
 
same here. I'll buy a Switch just for the Nintendo games like Zelda, Mario, Pokemon. I have my PS4/PC for everything else.

I think if Nintendo get a price that takes this strategy into account, they could do OK, as it;s the only way they will.

I've got both an Xbone/PS4 which do for most of my gaming but would not mind an affordable alternative e.g. Portable with a bit of power in it with good looking 1st party games.

That means £149 or, at a pinch £199 with a game.

Nintendo have clearly given up on trying to get to be people's primary gaming machine but if they play their cards right and have a better exclusive line-up, they can scoop up a space as a secondary with great games and portability.
 

KAL2006

Banned
Not even matching the current Nvidia Shield on the market when going with the exact same manufacturer is some hilarious "only Nintendo" shit.

Really trying to hit some battery life impossibility while saving money and not stumping up for a thicker heavier device with a more expensive battery. Shame because the idea of a hybrid is sound, its just Nintendo is so anti tech it's not gonna be what it could. Until maybe.... Revision 3!

If you wanted PS4/Xbox One/PC third party games, you know where you'll continue to find them.

When people kept comparing to NVidia Shield TV and saying it would be more powerful I was thinking why do this. NVidia Shield TV is not a handheld. Nintendo need to consider the thermal constraints, size and durability, and battery life. It's GAFs own fault for running wild with their expectations. I even said none of the games shown in the trailer were current gen yet once again GAF got carried away and ignored this.
 
It always stroke me as and impossibility that suddenly Nintendo is able to offer near Xbox One level of power in handheld form and with similar or less costs when even Sony wasn't able to do this with PSP and Vita and they are actually known for selling high end hw with loss. With these specs it sounds like that Switch is like PSP was compared to PS2 and Vita was compared to PS3 so a lot more probable and in line what Sony managed to offer.
 

Colbert

Banned
My 2 cents: For a mobile device battery life is the most important thing so I totally understand the design decisions to go with a very low clock. And tbh for that tiny screen on the go you don't need to have more performance at hand if we look on how Nintendo games look like from a gfx perspective.
 
iPad Pro has a 12.9" screen (2048x2732 resolution/264ppi). the CPU is an A9X which is dual core and runs at 2.26GHz. It's GPU can do between 100 GFLOPS to 1.5 TFLOPS.

Switch has a 6.2" screen (1280x720 resolution/236ppi). cpu runs at 1.02GHz. and it seems in portable mode the GPU should do 150GFLOPS. not sure about docked mode.

Adding the Vita, with a 5" screen (960 × 544 resolution / 220 ppi), GPU around 50 GFlops @ 400 MHz, 28 @ 200.

So the Switch has 1.77 more pixels to feed, with just 3-5 times more GPU power than the FIVE YEAR OLD Vita.
 

Padinn

Member
My initial take was disappointment with clock speeds, but after reflection there is a lot more to performance then the frequencies.
 

MuchoMalo

Banned
I guess a FIFA game that uses the same engine and physics as PS4 and Xbox One version is out of the question.

Nah, it can still use the same engine. It's still better suited for modern engines than last-gen ones. Physics will be an issue though.
 

jett

D-Member
If they backtracked on specs because of battery life, I'll be pissed.

Those tegra X1~ specs have been out forever, we never got clocktimes though. Now we do. What makes you think they backtracked on anything?

The Nintendo faithful just had unreasonable expectations. The machine is a handheld first and foremost, a standalone console pushed way, way into second place.
 

Xdrive05

Member
Exactly as I had predicted. They gimped the clocks in order to get battery life in portable. Still doesn't explain why they also gimped it docked. I guess they're just that concerned about heat issues.

Should have gone 16nm, or otherwise should have just accepted shitty battery life today in order to have a solid baseline performance to build future more power efficient revisions.

All of that said, it will still be very capable considering it's a fixed hardware platform and uses a totally modern feature set. You will see impressive stuff done on this thing, and in your hands even.

Hopefully this means they can very aggressively price it and get the install base up quickly. Still totally excited. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom