bananafactory
Banned
This always seemed like a dockable portable. I don't know why people expected something more.
In the end the games will be what matters
In the end the games will be what matters
Welp. I was wrong. It really is just a portable Wii U and bumped-up one when docked. Can we officially call NateDrake a fake now? This really is just where the successor to the Vita would land. Skyrim will chug on this. It's weaker than the PS3 by a huge margin when portable. This is not a current-generation machine.
I'm sorry to all of the naysayers I argued with. You were right. I'll never be optimistic about Nintendo again.
Half an Xbox One then ? Isn't that what we were all expecting ? There's probably something I'm missing.
This always seemed like a dockable portable. I don't know why people expected something more.
In the end the games will be what matters
Nobody could have suspected that Nintendo was going to pull a Nintendo.
I'm shocked.
Well, at least it was up last NPD. Unlike the declining dedicated home console market.Great isn't the term I would use for the declining dedicated handheld market.
And despite Nintendo fans continuing to beat this drum the number of people who care about those franchises (save maybe Pokemon) continues to shrink. Nintendo has to remain relevant for those franchises to gain new audiences and as it stands the mindshare Nintendo holds with younger audiences is only getting smaller outside of Japan.
I'd argue more kids in the west would know Minecraft before they do Mario and that's definitely true for Zelda.
Shark sandwich said:This thing is shaping up to be Wii U 2.0. It'll get the worst versions of multiplats if it's lucky enough to get them at all.
This could actually be far worse than Wii U because it has the potential to take down their handheld business as well. It's hard to imagine people going from 3DS to this big ass tablet thing with attachable controllers.
everything I have seen so far is a disappointment.
Oh, I guess you are from the future then ?
It's time to let the "dream" of PS4 ports go. Personally I never hoped for this really. Got a PS4 Pro for that.
This will be a 3DS on crack, which can be a nice thing too.
Wait, so why does it have fans with these specs?
And despite Nintendo fans continuing to beat this drum the number of people who care about those franchises (save maybe Pokemon) continues to shrink. Nintendo has to remain relevant for those franchises to gain new audiences and as it stands the mindshare Nintendo holds with younger audiences is only getting smaller outside of Japan.
I'd argue more kids in the west would know Minecraft before they do Mario and that's definitely true for Zelda.
And yet Mario will run at 60fps locked and will look better than many many PS4 games.
Well, at least it was up last NPD. Unlike the declining dedicated home console market.
At least they care more about Minecraft than those 2. I know in my home Youtube gets viewed for games, gaming and I have yet to see any of my kids use it for looking at anything Nintendo related.
I guess we will have to wait and see. If Nvidia isn't going to talk about Switch specs at the conference, the case is pretty much closed.
They know they can't compete with PS4 and Xbox One for third party, but Pokemon, Zelda, and Mario are so huge they don't have to.
Is this more powerful than Wii U?
It's a custom chip why are we assuming gflop counts of the standard tx1?
Did you watch the video? And the rumours it refers to?
Now, to be fair to Nvidia, Tegra X1's Maxwell was the final iteration of the architecture and does have technological aspects that are found in Pascal: specifically, double-rate FP16 support. We're also told that Switch has bespoke customisations that may involve pulling in other Pascal optimisations. And it's also worth noting that at the nuts and bolts level, Pascal and Maxwell are already very similar. So with that in mind, the main difference comes down to the process technology: 20nm in Maxwell, 16nm FinFET
CUDA core count and memory bandwidth are certainly in line with a standard Tegra X1, but critically, the leaked spec is extremely vague about the actual speed of the CPU and GPU, referring only to the maximum speeds seen on Nvidia's Shield Android TV micro-console. Assuming that Switch uses the same 20nm process technology as Shield, those clocks were never going to be attainable for a relatively small, handheld, battery-powered console. The Venturebeat story suggests that Switch is still using 20nm technology, but right now, this remains unconfirmed.
A few weeks ago, I had a dilemma... trade in my Wii U, PS3, iPod Classic 120 GB, and a bunch of games and put it all on a PS4 Pro, or save the credit for a Switch.
Feeling pretty proud of myself for my lack of restraint.
Is this more powerful than Wii U?
Nintendo called it their next home console, expecting more than this (a portable WiiU?) seems perfectly normal imo.This always seemed like a dockable portable. I don't know why people expected something more.
In the end the games will be what matters
Anyone else guess it was going to be near the power of the Wii U?
The last three consoles Nintendo has (or will) release are weaker than their competitors by a generation. They merely adapted their portable system moniker.
Anyone who expected a Nintendo system to be a powerhouse was setting themselves up for disappointment.
If you look at it as a portable device (which is what it is) it is great for one.
Oh yes of course, but the dock feature always was smoke and mirrors regardless of performance.
Yep, Switch is really a handheld with a TV out.
Nintendo's consoles have always sold worse than their handhelds so its obvious they'd double down on that, while giving people that want to play the same games on TV the option.