hanspampel
Banned
yesIs that real?
https://youtu.be/4DEfj2MRLtA?t=1218
No, the junior is just having fun. Just look at the image size, it is purposely small.
don't jump to conclusions, just because he's a junior
the image is real
yesIs that real?
No, the junior is just having fun. Just look at the image size, it is purposely small.
Is that real?
Comparing the 8-core chips on that Fritz benchmark would indicate that Broadwell is about 25-30% faster per core and MHz in that benchmark than the Ryzen chip. As far as I know it's an integer/branching heavy workload.
Comparing the 8-core chips on that Fritz benchmark would indicate that Broadwell is about 25-30% faster per core and MHz in that benchmark than the Ryzen chip. As far as I know it's an integer/branching heavy workload.
What do you think is weird about the step from the 7700K 5GHz to the 6900K?
Ah, too bad.Rumour is fake apparently, thread were the rumour started got deleted from Baidu forum and a mod confirmed it was fake. The benchmarks were run on a E5 2660.
Thanks, I'll edit my comment.Rumour is fake apparently, thread were the rumour started got deleted from Baidu forum and a mod confirmed it was fake. The benchmarks were run on a E5 2660.
Rumour is fake apparently, thread were the rumour started got deleted from Baidu forum and a mod confirmed it was fake. The benchmarks were run on a E5 2660.
Is that real?
No, the junior is just having fun. Just look at the image size, it is purposely small.
Event has no meaning on zen itself. Zen has to cover semi-custom(consoles), mobile, desktop and professional markets.
And AMD loves showing their performance against $1000 Intel cpus in games while quietly ignoring existence of highly clocked i7 quads to pryy on lack of knowledge of non enthusiast consumers.
And as far as zen is concerned it's more telling what wasn't shown (performance in cpu limited games) than meaningless benchmarks they did.
Why would non enthusiasts be watching a launch video of a cpu? I'm confused at your point.
I'm still at a loss on who would be watching such videos at all.
Any translation?Guess I'll post it in here. Some early Ryzen benchmark results got posted over at OC.net.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1619110/cpc-first-unofficial-ryzen-benchmarks/0_30
I am on Sandy Bridge so these look good to me anyway you slice it... all I have to see now is price and overclockability.Yeah, it seems to be around Broadwell when it comes to IPC. This is why it manages to keep up with Intel when it comes to multithreading. At least in the cases where bandwidth is less important since BW-E uses quad channel whereas Summit Ridge is only dual channel.
Unsurprisingly it falls below the Lakes in gaming because of Zen's weaker core per core performance and lower frequency.
One thing to note is that this sample seems to run at 3.15Ghz base and boosts up to 3.4.
Yeah, it seems to be around Broadwell when it comes to IPC. This is why it manages to keep up with Intel when it comes to multithreading. At least in the cases where bandwidth is less important since BW-E uses quad channel whereas Summit Ridge is only dual channel.
Unsurprisingly it falls below the Lakes in gaming because of Zen's weaker core per core performance and lower frequency.
One thing to note is that this sample seems to run at 3.15Ghz base and boosts up to 3.4.
AMD 2D3151A2M88E
Base clock : 3.15GHz
Turbo all core : 3.3GHz
Turbo one core : 3.5GHz
AMD seem to have a competitive product
It will all depend on pricing
Any translation?
AMD did say the base clock will be 3.4 and boost from there. I wonder if this was an engineering sample.
So this CPU and the new GPU (or a variant of it) will be what ends up in the Xbox Scorpio?
Stoney Ridge only has one 'module' (1.5 traditional 'cores'). I'm pretty sure it's not going to cut it. I don't think Bristol Ridge is too likely either, since you'd end up with a gargantuan chip and that causes low yields.For the CPU, if Jaguar isn't used again, AMD might be able to make one of their Excavator variants work in console power envelopes, I believe Stoney Ridge is supposed to be the low power Excavator variant that AMD is working on.
People keep forgetting that AMD has SR3, SR5 and SR7 skews for their Ryzen CPU, so some will be lower clocked, however, based on the conference we know the base mode will most likely be 3.4Ghz for all their CPU's with an uptick on the faster processors in the Ryzen class....It's highly unlikely that Zen will be in Scorpio if Scorpio comes out in 2017 as MS says it will, AMD has stated in no uncertain terms that custom/semi-custom Zen SoC's will not be available until 2018. As for the GPU it's more of a tossup, it can be Vega or it can be a custom Polaris variant. A cut down Vega makes more sense than a custom Polaris with extra cores, to meet the expected performance at a console power envelope.
For the CPU, if Jaguar isn't used again, AMD might be able to make one of their Excavator variants work in console power envelopes, I believe Stoney Ridge is supposed to be the low power Excavator variant that AMD is working on.
Same thing happens every time. I even get sucked into it sometimes
Yeah. They should temper expectations, I don't understand Lisa Su as this hype only benefits them temporarily, but long term it does more damage than any short-term spike in shares, as everyone will be disappointed, pushing them further to Intel.
Dunno about temporary benefits for AMD. Their share price has gone from a low of 1.8 to a high of 11.6 in a year.
Despite the 'same thing happening every time'.
They must be doing something right.
The Ryzen results in that french article are fantastic. Proportionally accounting for the lower clockrate indicates it has the potential to be as good or better than the 6900K if the retail version matches the same clock rates.
Personally looking forward to having a high performing chip that supports hardware level hypersvisors. I'm not too thrilled with how Intel partitions features.
Btw is Ryzen the name of their new CPU line, or just the particular top-end model (ala Fury)
Doesn't look like final product
Do you seriously believe that? I mean I wish but nahI'm predicting it to be half the cost of a stock 6900k
It's highly unlikely that Zen will be in Scorpio if Scorpio comes out in 2017 as MS says it will, AMD has stated in no uncertain terms that custom/semi-custom Zen SoC's will not be available until 2018. As for the GPU it's more of a tossup, it can be Vega or it can be a custom Polaris variant. A cut down Vega makes more sense than a custom Polaris with extra cores, to meet the expected performance at a console power envelope.
For the CPU, if Jaguar isn't used again, AMD might be able to make one of their Excavator variants work in console power envelopes, I believe Stoney Ridge is supposed to be the low power Excavator variant that AMD is working on.
Do you seriously believe that? I mean I wish but nah
Again I ask, could you not be bothered to watch the presentation? They did:Yes. Kind of random that they used that image and showed Xbox Project Scorpio. Why not just used the PS4 Pro since its already out?
You are incorrect. The information comes from the very large and reputable German tech site ComputerBase. The relevant quote is:I have yet to see proof AMD said any such thing. That information, to my knowledge, comes from a single website of suspect credibility, that had a grand total of, what, maybe 8 stories up on the site? All signs point to Zen custom/semi-custom SoCs being ready 2017, not 2018.
ComputerBase said:Polaris soll nach dem Stand der Gerüchte auch in den kommenden überarbeiteten Konsolen von Microsoft und Sony stecken, dort werden sie aber weiterhin mit alten Prozessorkernen gepaart – entgegengesetzt einiger aktueller Medienberichte auch bei Microsofts Xbox Scorpio. Zen-Kerne und neue Grafik als Semi-Custom-Lösung soll es nicht vor 2018 geben, deutete AMDs Chefin Lisa Su in kleiner Runde an.
Should have kept the name as Zen, I dont think many consumer products starts with a 'R'
I have yet to see proof AMD said any such thing. That information, to my knowledge, comes from a single website of suspect credibility, that had a grand total of, what, maybe 8 stories up on the site? All signs point to Zen custom/semi-custom SoCs being ready 2017, not 2018. Even if they don't make it into desktop products by 2017, I see no reason it can't make it ahead of time into a console like Project Scorpio.
I find it very difficult to believe Project Scorpio won't have a Zen - Vega Combo. If it doesn't, the wait for release may seem all the more ridiculous. They couldn't honestly be waiting just for a Vega GPU. To make their power claims true, a Zen CPU of some kind makes the most sense. I don't see them going with much older AMD CPU tech when they had a realistic chance to get AMD's latest and greatest. Not happening.
Asus already uses 'Zen' prefix for a lot of their major products.Should have kept the name as Zen, I dont think many consumer products starts with a 'R'
I have yet to see proof AMD said any such thing. That information, to my knowledge, comes from a single website of suspect credibility, that had a grand total of, what, maybe 8 stories up on the site? All signs point to Zen custom/semi-custom SoCs being ready 2017, not 2018. Even if they don't make it into desktop products by 2017, I see no reason it can't make it ahead of time into a console like Project Scorpio.
I find it very difficult to believe Project Scorpio won't have a Zen - Vega Combo. If it doesn't, the wait for release may seem all the more ridiculous. They couldn't honestly be waiting just for a Vega GPU. To make their power claims true, a Zen CPU of some kind makes the most sense. I don't see them going with much older AMD CPU tech when they had a realistic chance to get AMD's latest and greatest. Not happening.
I talked about our Zen roadmap for our products, in terms of desktops, servers and notebooks, but one should expect Zen in our semi-custom roadmap as well as we look beyond 2017 into the 18/19 timeframe, and so we really do view this as developing foundational IP that can go into a number of different markets and we have good prospects in those areas.
Will Zen chips get some mini itx boards?
Does this mean I could get a high end CPU from AMD on a small board? Because that would be cool.