You quoted me saying, I do not expect the same asset density in all regions - so that should answer your first question.
To rephrase what I have said is that it was unlikely that we were shown the region with the highest asset density only in the initial reveal and then never again.
That is what does not make sense.
Eh, not really. All you said was that we haven't seen an area with that sort of grass density (but we kinda have). The super recent stuff not really, it's all been the plateau area I believe (outside of trailers).
So you responded to my question with "we" and I addressed the "we" with my next question. Not necessarily you personally, but you were speaking for the people who throw up that comparison as downgrade fuel.
I'm just saying it's stupid to not do direct comparisons.
That's all, no need to linger on it.
But talking about that initial reveal again. Is all we have that terrible quality video? I haven't look too much. I found a nice big image, but when you blow it up, it doesn't look great. I don't think there's anything in that trailer that doesn't "exist" in the game today. Asset quality and all that are there imo. I would say that area might not exist or be exactly the same as the trailer (we know this stuff changes during development), but I think the IQ is doable on the switch (with BotW no less).
I don't know why GAF keeps going down the same road, jumping to conclusions ahead of release, using poor quality screenshots and videos to try and prove a point, comparing non similar scenarios/areas/lighting/etc.