• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Kotaku: "Only 90% of Xbox One GPU usable for games"- PS4 GPU up to 66% more powerful?

Omni

Member
As long as their are good games who cares if the system is less powerful than WII U. Gaf is so disappointing sometimes. Its like really who gives a @$#@ if the system is not powerful. Does that mean you wont get good games? NO
Less powerful than the Wii U?
 

nib95

Banned
So am I missing something? If XB1 is running over 200 gbps. Is that better than 176?

They fluffed their numbers and lied. Their main ram runs at 68GB/s. Not 200. And no you can't just add it up like that. The Esram may run at 102Gbps or whatever it is, but it's still only 32mb worth...
 
They fluffed their numbers and lied. Their main ram runs at 68GB/s. Not 200. And no you can't just add it up like that. The Esram may run at 102Gbps or whatever it is, but it's still only 32mb worth...

So that guy who is part of the silicon maker is lying about over 200 gbps of data? Have you watched the architecture panel?
 

seanoff

Member
So am I missing something? If XB1 is running over 200 gbps. Is that better than 176?

yes, fuzzy math MS style. add up all the bandwidth on the system to get 200. its a bullshit number that means SFA.

the Sony 176 is much more honest as it is the speed from the RAM to the SOC.
 

Evolved1

make sure the pudding isn't too soggy but that just ruins everything
Wouldn't be the first time. I mean if we look back, the hardware engineer for 360 said it had 1TFLOP of power...oh and 270GB/s+ of bandwidth.

Funky math is funky.

Okay... now I have to ask after seeing it for days: who is your avatar? lol
 

nib95

Banned
So that guy who is part of the silicon maker is lying about over 200 gbps of data? Have you watched the architecture panel?

Yes I have. I am 100% on this. It's not so much a lie (though it sort of is that too) as it is a gross obfuscation of the real facts and figures.
 

mavs

Member
I dont see the benefit of that guy in the panel lying about what he and his team have worked so hard to create.

If you think that's a lie then the stickers they put on the side of power supplies are lying to you. They just added peak CPU BW to peak GPU bandwidth, much like power supplies you better not count on pulling down peak draw all the time or you're headed for trouble.
 

nib95

Banned
I dont see the benefit of that guy in the panel lying about what he and his team have worked so hard to create.

Bit naive. The benefit is that their console in PR doesn't sound weaker than the PS4, when it actually is. They will play the numbers and PR any way they can to hide this fact. Same reason they didn't mention their ram was DDR3, or specify specs and instead quoted a pointless transistor count.
 
If you think that's a lie then the stickers they put on the side of power supplies are lying to you. They just added peak CPU BW to peak GPU bandwidth, much like power supplies you better not count on pulling down peak draw all the time or you're headed for trouble.

Im not a genius about hardware or anything. Im just curious as to why a team or guy who is part of the making of the system would outright lie about everything that is said. How can we believe anything from anyone if we dont take what they say with truth?

"Its like saying Cerny said there was 8gb of DDR5 of ram but we dont have the system in our hands and see the ram so how do we know thats true? He is spinning the truth and is lying."

If I work for many years on a product or a part of a product. Im not going to lie about what Ive done and what its capable of doing. Sadly your right and there are those who lie. As a business/professional its sad to know this. I just hope we see a solid product. I can honestly say Im pumped for both Sony and MS
 

nib95

Banned
Im not a genius about hardware or anything. Im just curious as to why a team or guy who is part of the making of the system would outright lie about everything that is said. How can we believe anything from anyone if we dont take what they say with truth?

Its like saying Cerny said there was 8gb of DDR5 of ram but we dont have the system in our hands and see the ram so how do we know thats true? He is spinning the truth and is lying.

AMD did the numbers for these guys, and the Gpu, cpu etc. So the numbers in this sense are legit and comparable. They won't out right lie because people can easily inspect these things and tear them a new one otherwise. All Microsoft is doing is being particularly misleading about tallying their figures to make the console appear faster than it is.
 

Truespeed

Member
So am I missing something? If XB1 is running over 200 gbps. Is that better than 176?

Yeah, you're missing their bullshit and indirection. Like their 5 Billion transistor statement - it's true, but it's insignificant when you break it down and see how they arrived at that number.

According to their data, there’s roughly 50GB/s of bandwidth in each direction to the SoC’s embedded SRAM (102GB/s total bandwidth). The combination of the two plus the CPU-GPU connection at 30GB/s is how Microsoft arrives at its 200GB/s bandwidth figure, although in reality that’s not how any of this works. If it’s used as a cache, the embedded SRAM should significantly cut down on GPU memory bandwidth requests which will give the GPU much more bandwidth than the 256-bit DDR3-2133 memory interface would otherwise imply. Depending on how the eSRAM is managed, it’s very possible that the Xbox One could have comparable effective memory bandwidth to the PlayStation 4. If the eSRAM isn’t managed as a cache however, this all gets much more complicated.

BThp7T5.jpg
 

Tripolygon

Banned
Im not a genius about hardware or anything. Im just curious as to why a team or guy who is part of the making of the system would outright lie about everything that is said. How can we believe anything from anyone if we dont take what they say with truth?

"Its like saying Cerny said there was 8gb of DDR5 of ram but we dont have the system in our hands and see the ram so how do we know thats true? He is spinning the truth and is lying."

If I work for many years on a product or a part of a product. Im not going to lie about what Ive done and what its capable of doing. Sadly your right and there are those who lie. As a business/professional its sad to know this. I just hope we see a solid product. I can honestly say Im pumped for both Sony and MS
Edit: i'll simplify my comment

There is stretching the truth, then there is outright lying. I'm sure you can tell the difference between the two but if not, you are either being facetious or you're dumb.
 
Is the jump from 360 to One really not good enough?

Was the jump from the Wii to the WiiU good enough?

It's not about "good enough", it's comparing hardware in order to speculate about what's going to happen next gen. The Wii didn't get a lot of the popular games that the PC/360/PS3 got because it wasn't comparable in power. It's possible that the Xbone will be lacking enough compared to the PC/PS4 that some game won't be able to run on it, this would obviously impact a lot of peoples decision to buy it. That's all this talk boils down to.
 

jaypah

Member
Was the jump from the Wii to the WiiU good enough?

It's not about "good enough", it's comparing hardware in order to speculate about what's going to happen next gen. The Wii didn't get a lot of the popular games that the PC/360/PS3 got because it wasn't comparable in power. It's possible that the Xbone will be lacking enough compared to the PC/PS4 that some game won't be able to run on it, this would obviously impact a lot of peoples decision to buy it. That's all this talk boils down to.

Yeah, I don't think that's going to happen. They'll just baseline it out on X1 and hopefully use the extra juice in the PS4 for some improvements (frame rate, IQ, effects, etc).
 

Myansie

Member
I'm really looking forward to e3 and seeing how Sony's power advantage pans out. Will the law of diminishing returns kick in and the differences be marginal or will there be a technical gulf even the layman can perceive? I'm a Sony fan so I'm leaning to the later. I'll hold off on conclusions though until we see the exclusives at e3.
 

Sylonious

Member
So this is because of the suspend/resume feature, right? Will the PS4 also have 120 gflops locked for the suspend/resume feature? Seems like such a waste, IMO.
 

Alchemy

Member
I'm really looking forward to e3 and seeing how Sony's power advantage pans out. Will the law of diminishing returns kick in and the differences be marginal or will there be a technical gulf even the layman can perceive? I'm a Sony fan so I'm leaning to the later. I'll hold off on conclusions though until we see the exclusives at e3.

What I expect is the difference between details in individual models and textures won't be very high between the platforms, but the scope will be where we see the difference. Environment size and detail, number of detailed entities, etc.
 

Sandfox

Member
Yeah, I don't think that's going to happen. They'll just baseline it out on X1 and hopefully use the extra juice in the PS4 for some improvements (frame rate, IQ, effects, etc).

Given what we've heard about the devices I wouldn't be surprised if the games were made with the PS4 in mind and the XBone just got scaled down versions.
 

Myansie

Member
What I expect is the difference between details in individual models and textures won't be very high between the platforms, but the scope will be where we see the difference. Environment size and detail, number of detailed entities, etc.

My hope is it transfers into some really far out physics effects like liquids and destructible environments. I'm being a tad optimistic, but their behaviour on both platforms should still be way better than what we currently have.
 
Top Bottom