• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

TRUTHFACT: MS having eSRAM yield problems on Xbox One

Status
Not open for further replies.

wsippel

Banned
Isn't the problem the way it handles data?
Yes and no. Normal DRAM behaves differently. But that's what pseudostatic RAM is for - DRAM that hides refresh cycles and therefore behaves like SRAM. That's what Nintendo usually uses. Pseudostatic RAM is a bit bigger and more complex compared to regular DRAM, but still a lot smaller and has a much lower power consumption compared to SRAM.

I can only think of two possible reasons for Microsoft to go with SRAM: 1. SRAM scales better with die shrinks, though I doubt 32MB SRAM will ever be smaller than 32MB eDRAM during the Xbox One lifecycle. 2. AMD simply doesn't have the technology and they couldn't or wouldn't get IBM or Renesas on board for some reason.
 
It not all doom and gloom for MS

power has never determined the winner and its certainly no wii/wiiu situation in regards to power and 3rd party support.

As long as the X1 gets the same 3rd party support as the PS4, the power difference will only effect like 5% of the gaming population.

in the short term.

But anyone thinking this generation can last as long as the current one is in for a suprise i think.
 

1-D_FTW

Member
If you do stupid things, other bad things will happen to you. Stupidity is one of the leading causes of death nowadays.

Seriously, that could have been bleach, or acid in that cup. Never know.

You are aware he kicked her, right? At first I thought it was funny, cause Karma. Then I finally saw she didn't slip, but had her leg kicked out while standing on water. And her head hit pretty hard against the pavement.

As for what was in the cup? Huh? He knew. It wasn't a pre-emptive move to prevent getting hit with "acid". He got a little water thrown on him (probably for being a douche) and decided to kick her (confirming he's a douche) in retaliation.

Sorry for the thread derail. But come on, couldn't let that go.
 

MoeB

Member
Xbox's "all in one" approach kinda reminds me about this:

homer_front1.jpg

Just right.
 
I don't believe these rumors. I'm pretty sure MS has a huge plan for total domination, they've been cooking this bad boy for a long time, they know what they're doing.

Anyway, it'll all change next Monday when Microsoft announces their Megatons !

Then hardware talk will be forgotten.

Do you guys actually believe MS will let Sony get a head start and risk loosing this gen ? lol, i just don't believe that. And who knows, Sony may have the same problems, we just haven't heard from them as much as MS these past days...
 
Their goal relies more on (a change of) perception than (a change of) reality. They have built a filter/funnel. I don't see why they can't succeed.

I feel like Microsoft sees itself back 20 years ago. "If we get a product in the living room that captures an audience we can keep them locked in and grow it". Technology and habits are changing so much that w/ the scale that they're attempting I think it's a very large gamble.
 

Septimius

Junior Member
Honestly this sounds to me more like they didn't plan at all lunching 2013 but Sony suprized them and shit got real @ MS. This would explain why they waited so long for response to that meeting.

One thing is sure. Sony got lucky a lot.

There's no real luck involved. If Sony can blindside MS, more power to them. If MS wants to go with their time-frame, then they're in trouble. They did, and they are. It was their choice.

Sony has had the time to work out these kinks, carefully plan die layout and other factors, and have a much more robust product to show for it.
 
I don't believe these rumors. I'm pretty sure MS has a huge plan for total domination, they've been cooking this bad boy for a long time, they know what they're doing.

Anyway, it'll all change next Monday when Microsoft announces their Megatons !

Then hardware talk will be forgotten.

Do you guys actually believe MS will let Sony get a head start and risk loosing this gen ? lol, i just don't believe that. And who knows, Sony may have the same problems, we just haven't heard from them as much as MS these past days...

No game will make me purchase this cluster fuck at this point, sorry.
 

Raist

Banned
also, in addition to hardware issues, the OS is fucked? this is based on inside information or just that the reveal demo was faked (which i'd assume would virtually always be the case for a big reveal on stage with early hardware and software to avoid bugs/crashes/embarrassing moments)

It's fine to "fake it" just to prevent such issues, it's a whole different thing to "fake it" when you're currently incapable of having it run like this, especially when it's one of the (if not THE) major points of focus for the whole conference and design philosophy, and what they're trying to "sell".
 
Sony have decades of hardware manufacturing experience.
You can't just outsource or hire people and get to that level no matter how deep your pockets are.
MS aren't bad at hardware, they just haven't got the same infrastructure.
Neither did Apple, but they really got fortunate with absolutely top-notch engineers, hands-off management, and huge investment in Foxconn.

I think it is not that hard to make great hardware but when you set up some of the stupid goals Microsoft has for the Xbox it creates a lot of restrictions that have to be worked around.
 

StuBurns

Banned
'Faking' the OS is fine if you are sure you can match the fake by launch. If the product cycle is predictable, showing people what they will get is perfectly respectable.
 

Xater

Member
Man the bad news with this console just keep on coming. They reveal actually even made the situation worse. What the hell was MS doing all these years? At least Sony seem to have their shit together.
 

op_ivy

Fallen Xbot (cannot continue gaining levels in this class)
We've had 2 more people come forward confirming the same thing.

thank you. can you clarify if they added credability to gpu clockspeed downgrade? esram issues? shitty OS? or all the above?
 

tickling

Banned
Said in the other thread.Amazon cutting back in the pre-order for the x1 got an email sayin supply issues can email to mod to confirm. Could this to be blame?
 

Kaako

Felium Defensor
Unfortunately it's not. There are performance issues. In some cases, its quite significant.
This is worrisome, indeed. Don't think I've seen a thread where all the "insiders" or people with insider knowledge came in and basically confirmed the rumor at hand. The rumor just became fact in my eyes.
 
I don't believe these rumors. I'm pretty sure MS has a huge plan for total domination, they've been cooking this bad boy for a long time, they know what they're doing.

Anyway, it'll all change next Monday when Microsoft announces their Megatons !

Then hardware talk will be forgotten.

Do you guys actually believe MS will let Sony get a head start and risk loosing this gen ? lol, i just don't believe that. And who knows, Sony may have the same problems, we just haven't heard from them as much as MS these past days...

If Sony had these sort of problems we would have heard about it by now .
We had leaks about these machines for months and in almost everyone it was not good news for MS .
 
Their goal relies more on (a change of) perception than (a change of) reality. They have built a filter/funnel. I don't see why they can't succeed.

With all microsofts marketing muscle they cannot change consumer behaviour that has proven time and time again that people en masse will never accept an all in one device for their entertainment.

People will always want options.


To many have tried at this point to even attempt.

The only thing close to achieving this is the Television itself and even that wont.
 

Raide

Member
Said in the other thread.Amazon cutting back in the pre-order for the x1 got an email sayin supply issues can email to mod to confirm. Could this to be blame?

They had the date as December 31st. I don't think it was going to stick to that date. Could it be a factor? Possibly. Would MS have already told suppliers about unit issues or how many they were expecting? Doubtful.
 

Septimius

Junior Member
I don't believe these rumors. I'm pretty sure MS has a huge plan for total domination, they've been cooking this bad boy for a long time, they know what they're doing.

Honestly, if the steady stream of news and rumors about just how far behind MS are, if the latest facts on the UI not even being run by an Xbone during the reveal, how choppy it works now, and all these rumors on production problems due to shortage of time, you're TRYING to overlook them. There's simply no denying that Microsoft are in scramble mode. They've thrown money at games and hardware in hope to get something ready in no time. It doesn't really work. So no, they haven't been cooking this bad boy for long enough.

You might be right that they have a good idea of what they're doing. It might sell well, but not to game-centric circles. That's fine. Let's not try to speculate that. But clearly Microsoft have overlooked the gamer with this console, and they have overlooked the hardware, just so they can sprint to the finish line. Those are serious overlooks for me as a consumer, and I won't trust them with my gaming experiences this coming gen.

So sure, don't believe these rumors, but don't think for a second that they're not in complete disarray at Microsoft over the short time they have to prepare this thing for launch.
 
CPU is only a bottleneck if a game is designed to demand a lot from the CPU. This is highly up to a game per game basis.

Even so, considering the fact that GPGPU is going to be a big thing this gen, even more importance will be put on the GPU as it will be able to pick up some tasks normally given to the CPU (physics being the obvious one). I actually don't really think the CPU will be much of an issue at all this gen if the physics are offloaded.

Many popular games, like Minecraft, lately use "voxels" which are CPU dependent, so yes it is game dependent.

That said, I did read an article from a developer that basically stated "most people concentrate on the GPU so much in games they don't realize how much work (i.e., most of the work) developers go to in optimizing the game for the CPU."

I'll see if I can find it again.
 
I don't believe these rumors. I'm pretty sure MS has a huge plan for total domination, they've been cooking this bad boy for a long time, they know what they're doing.

Anyway, it'll all change next Monday when Microsoft announces their Megatons !

Then hardware talk will be forgotten.

Do you guys actually believe MS will let Sony get a head start and risk loosing this gen ? lol, i just don't believe that. And who knows, Sony may have the same problems, we just haven't heard from them as much as MS these past days...

Unless MS by chance signed a deal on the next big thing a la Sony with GTA in the Ps2 days (a deal MS pissed on lol, imagine GTA + Halo...), there's nothing MS can do.
 
Is good planning and foresight luck? I think Sony started development of the PS4 years before MS based on Major Nelson's quote, "we started thinking about a successor for the 360 in 2010".

Sony also had a lot more incentive to really put everything into this coming off the billions they lost on PS3, as well as Sony as a company floundering. In contrast, Microsoft had a lot of momentum heading into next-gen and might have just coasted along thinking everything would turn out OK.
 
I still hold the thought that in previous generations it was easy to mask power differences through showpiece games most people couldn't tell the difference between unless side by side.Except last gen when it came to the phenomenon that was the Wii, which I don't think we will see again this gen. Part of that was because of the differences in architecture making porting and optimization more of a hassle. However, this coming generation the architecture is the same with PS4 actually having all the advantages of better specs, unified memory pool, and a maturer dev environment. So all of that should make optimization for the PS4 not only easier but yield very noticeable results. Jonathan Blow even went as far as speculating it could be a difference of the PS4 getting a 60FPS version while the Xbox gets 30FPS.

The real kicker? The PS4 could very well be cheaper to purchase.

But this was the same difference we saw in the PS2 vs Xbox era. Max Payne, for example, ran at <20fps for the most part on PS2 and almost 60fps on Xbox. Not only was the Xbox more powerful, but in that case the more powerful system also had the easier architecture to deal with. But Xbox didn't steal the crown that gen, because it didn't have the software.

This forthcoming generation will be primarily a marketing battle. And it won't be the quantity of exclusives that matter, but the significance of the exclusives - eg whatever will be the next GTA or Halo. Other than that, it's down to the services each console offers. The power difference will only really play in to the decisions of people like us here on GAF in the main. If the general public were really that bothered about graphics they'd be buying plasmas instead of LCDs, and 360/PS3 would have wiped the floor with Wii from the get-go.
 

1-D_FTW

Member
Well the psp upped their clocks (maybe reinstated is a better word) a good while after it launched.

I don't think you understand the issue here. All PSP's shipped with that working frequency, it was just underclocked for better battery life.

These will be underclocked to get yields up. If they suddenly remove that "underclock" on launch units, a bunch of people would suddenly have Xboxes that were defective and wouldn't work.
 

tickling

Banned
They had the date as December 31st. I don't think it was going to stick to that date. Could it be a factor? Possibly. Would MS have already told suppliers about unit issues or how many they were expecting? Doubtful.

No it's an email saying supplier difficulties
 
I was reading the gametrailers/youtube comments on the reveal video, and many were 'yep same specs as PS4, 8 core CPU, 8GB RAM'

Pretty ridiculous

You think that was bad?

Try listening to multiple podcasts made by people who are paid to cover this industry, who also said similar things.
 

dionysus

Yaldog
Probably already answered but this thread is long.

Can lowering clocks on esram improve yields like it does on GPUs and CPUs? Maybe improving yields is the wrong term as the quality of chips doesn't change, but more poor quality chips becoming usable is what I mean.
 
The thing is, 'all-in-one' can also give us the iPhone. That's what I was hoping for from Xbone, anyway.

The iphone wasnt all in one anything at first.


It didnt have a app store, its camera was shit, its interface was basic and it was highly restrictive.

The first iphone was heavily marketed feature phone on the basis of touch. Its improved over the years but the main reason people see it as an all in one device is being mobile, you only have room for one or 2 devices.

The living room is a far different beast.
 

McHuj

Member
Said in the other thread.Amazon cutting back in the pre-order for the x1 got an email sayin supply issues can email to mod to confirm. Could this to be blame?

I'm not going to speculate, but these yield issues if they're true will definitely impact release data and launch numbers. We could be looking at a 360 like launch all over again and frankly if PS4 doesn't have similar issues, Sony will be in a really good spot.
 
Can someone explain this rumor/issue in normal human being terms, or link me to a post if someone's already made one?

MS is having trouble making enough XboxOne's with the current configuration. Which may lead to either a delay... or lowering the specs in order to be able to make them in sufficient number.

Bad yields like this is like, for example every 10 working consoles they make 5 don''t make it out of the factory. Which is very expensivo.
 

DBT85

Member
Probably already answered but this thread is long.

Can lowering clocks on esram improve yields like it does on GPUs and CPUs? Maybe improving yields is the wrong term as the quality of chips doesn't change, but more poor quality chips becoming usable is what I mean.

Yes that is what is being discussed.

The eSRAM isn't being fabbed to the standard they want, one option is to bin the chips, one option is to lower the expectations for each chip in order to improve how many you can use.
 
Third Console Curse setting in ;)

Joking aside, if all this is true, it's gotta suck for all those guys working at MS on this project: all the bad press Microsoft is getting. I hope e3 can change all that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom