This is Eurogamer though, I'm not willing to believe them yet. Just a few days ago we had the "seven" being confused for "several" debacle, and the arrogance in how they corrected themselves afterwards.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
FRIDAYTON MK II: 5.5 million bears and salmon create unholy allliance to sack SONY HQ
- Thread starter Canis lupus
- Start date
This is Eurogamer though, I'm not willing to believe them yet. Just a few days ago we had the "seven" being confused for "several" debacle, and the arrogance in how they corrected themselves afterwards.
LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
Where are those tweets from the on original guy yesterday which said this would decrease the performance difference between PS4 and Xbone?
If it's talking about having ram at parity or better than Xbone then it was truly hyperbole on his part.
If it's talking about having ram at parity or better than Xbone then it was truly hyperbole on his part.
Alx
Member
The X1 and the PS4 shouldn't be that different, both have an OS for games, an OS for other apps, and "something in-between" to hold everything together. If they're aiming at similar features, it's not that surprising for them to have similar resource usage, even if we still don't see why the non-gaming part requires as much.
User 108080
Banned
Oman that made me LOL
battlefieldfan1
Banned
Um, no?
I'm actually going to buy a PS4 next-gen. I was primarily a 360 gamer this gen and I have no plans on buying an xbox ONE.
From Microsoft's and SONY's track record, Microsoft does have better engineers.
The PS4's superior architecture stemmed from outside help along with SONY's lucky high-density GDDR5 module gamble. Microsoft always planned on having an 8 GB machine, so they stuck with DDR3 and had to develop a way to engineer around the piss-poor bandwidth of the DDR3 RAM.
It was dumb-luck that gave SONY the superior machine.
"However, according to a PlayStation 4 developer PS4Daily spoke to, they have access to only 7 GB of RAM. The remaining 1 GB is reserved for the operating system and background tasks."
a PlayStation 4 developer = inside sources
Ugh. I'm sure OS alone is quite lean and efficient. If they're really keeping 3.5 GB reserved it won't be to only run the OS but for apps, recording, etc.
Meus Renaissance
Member
Unlike PC games, PS4 titles will be restricted to the what comes in the box for the next decade
Kabuki Quantum Lover
Member
Reactions of cancelling preorders would indicate that some consider it a problem.
BloodMoney
Banned
isn't it obvious that this increase OS allocation confirms Oculus Rift support...
no, no it does not.
no, no it does not.
mullet2000
Member
I didn't want to start a huge fanboy war, but yes I do find it weird that so many people are going "what guys, 5.5 GB is AMAZING going forward!" when MS was so ripped apart for it over the last few months.
Mark Cerny has NO twitter account!
Kung Fu Grip
Banned
I'm sorry but i'll wait for an actual confirmation on this than well placed development sources.
SirIgbyCeaser
Banned
38 pages about RAM. Bravo 2013 gamers.
38 PAGES OF PURE CONSOLE WAR BLISS.
Eh, it's different. On a PC performance for any individual app isn't guaranteed. If you have 15 things running and then load up The Witcher 2, you expect it to run like shit. It can't work like that on a set top box. You put hard restrictions on the the number of things that can run simultaneously, but you also have to guarantee resource availability and performance. So between smooth performance across the board, lots of OS functionality and small memory footprint, you pick 2.
Really is that you get from reading this thread? If so then perhaps you got take off your selective reading goggles.
Can Crusher
Banned
The emotion feature eats a whole lot of Ram.
It'll never be since its completly untrue.
If you guys want info from Sony, might as well send out a tweet mentioning @yosp @amboyes @rohdescott asking if this is legitimate.
Who are you, exactly? Are you an insider?
Who are you, exactly? Are you an insider?
Skull Leader
Banned
Steam survey shows hardware configurations, not what games actually use.
Most games don't make use of more than 4 gigs of dedicated video memory OR system ram. IIRC, it's limitations with Windows, more than anything.
Not saying it can't be useful, but I don't think you should post that as evidence of anything.
Now you are the third one with this nonsense!
What is wrong with you guys?
Do you even read this thread?
If this news was true, which I doubt, 5.5 might be 'an incredible amount', but it would be even more incredible if games could be designed with the full 7 originally speculated. 4 might be enough 'right now', but when games get more complex down the line, the more RAM, the better.
There is a case for Microsoft blocking off 3 GB of RAM. They have the always on kinect and a bunch of multimedia functionality going on. Sony has no such thing.
There is a case for Microsoft blocking off 3 GB of RAM. They have the always on kinect and a bunch of multimedia functionality going on. Sony has no such thing.
liquidspeed
Member
exactly
It is incredibly disappointing if true. Is there a lot of evidence that this is for real?
My PS4 hype has also dropped by 3.5
Eurogamer mentions that in old dev documents that a 512MB system reserve was stated. I
Read the entire article.
Eurogamer mentions that in old dev documents that a 512MB system reserve was stated. I
battlefieldfan1
Banned
The 360 released 1 year before the PS3 and both consoles were neck-and-neck in terms of performance. Microsoft also spent less $$$ than SONY on R&D.
I already tweeted Adam Boyes and Shuhei Yoshida for clarification, linking to the article. Hopefully they will respond to someone.
Excuse me? Based on this rumor, both company's engineers would appear to be roughly as bad as each other.
CambriaRising
Member
None at all.
mario_O
Member
LightofRohan
Member
Uh... People are complaining? What? Initial rumors/tests was hearing around 2 gigs available to games and X1 was around 1.5. 5.5 would be incredible and stop comparing PC ram to console ram use... Not even close to the same thing.
Beer Monkey
Member
Sure there's a point. Saving disc bandwidth for the actual streaming of game assets.
I'm all for saving the 15 minutes of video in RAM. Just downsample it to 720p and apply a good amount of compression to it.
You are right, it's not the same thing. Console OS memory footprint has always been much smaller than on PCs.
This memory might be reserved, but it's not for the kernel.
You may want to browse the thread again. Every page has at least 2-3 posters saying this is stupid, unwise, etc.
You're right.
Metalmurphy
Member
Are you reading the same thread I am? o0
FunkyPajamas
Member
This needs to be made into a DEAL WITH IT gif, ASAP.
Well, I'll just come out and say that a few insiders confiemed 7GB available so this conflicts with that. Either Eurgamer are wrong, or some devs are, or Sony made some changes. We shall see. But if Eurogamer is wrong on this one they're going to lose a shit amount of credibility, so I can't imagine they'd take the risk without some backing. The plot thickens.
pharmboy044
Member
Just an FYI, that Cerny account is fake.
CaptainTiptop
Member
The consoles use different RAM, though. It's not just the amount that matters.
Can Crusher
Banned
38 pages about RAM. Bravo 2013 gamers.
I thought Neogaf was a fashion forum too.
Please leave your common sense at the neogaf door.
It has to do with the fact that GDDR5>DDR3. Even if you don't have a greater amount, the quality still makes it better. That's not to say I agree with it being "amazing" because it's disappointing but I'm not getting all worked up until we get an official statement. Sadly, that's not going to stop people from overreacting and trolls coming by with asinine statements.
Evolution_1ne
Banned
or you know people like to use their brains and employ common sense
but don't like logic get in the way of the stupid train, nothing stops this train
Portugeezer
Member
Doesn't your second sentence contradict your first?
Regardless, I think the Quantic Dream Tech Demo shows that Sony was planning about 4-5Gb of available memory for developers for a long time. I stand by the assertion that you build a 'Tech-Demo' to show off the theoretical graphics capabilities of a machine. You don't write an entire engine for this.
Quantic Dream built The Dark Sorcerer and made it run within 4Gb's of RAM. Developers will all use those 4Gb's differently, but they wanted to show the upper limit of what is possible.
Not sure when people will realize that it's the GAMES and services that should be the draw, and not the ram. It's weird watching people turn their back on what they call a cool looking game simply because the other machine has (had) more ram (but never mention a game). I don't play ram, I play fun games.
This thread is a hoot. Cant wait for the yay or nay from Sony.
This thread is a hoot. Cant wait for the yay or nay from Sony.