Can Crusher
Banned
I see people keep trying to spread that fud.
Aren't there a whole bunch of xbox and ps3 games thats native resolutions is 540p, like COD I know this is tangentially related but the games native resolution could be lower and still look as magnificent.
Huh? PS3 got the timed exclusive DLC for BF3. Unless something drastically changed, then Sony would be the favored one. It's the polar opposite to the COD deals.
Aren't there a whole bunch of xbox and ps3 games thats native resolutions is 540p, like COD I know this is tangentially related but the games native resolution could be lower and still look as magnificent.
Embarrasing. If Killzone can pull out 1080p and probably 60 FPS in multiplayer, so should they.
And another thing, even if the PS4 has the same performance as that GPU, wouldn't you need a certain spec'd CPU in order to take full advantage of that GPU?
Nah resolution has nothing to do with the cpu.
it already runs at 60 fps so it means the world simulation is run at 60 fps.
It is the representation of that world that takes to much resources to render at 1080p@60fps. Dice go for 1600:900 at least that should be the floor for next gen resolution.
People keep comparing the PS4 GPU to the HD 7850 or whatever it is and state that card can run BF4 fine at max detail 1080p.
1600 X 900.
Believe. I often make this compromise on PC. I can see it being used on consoles.
So Dice says it's bullshit and you guys are still arguing about it?
2 years old is not "old". It's respectable enough to get really good performance out of it in the coming years.
The notion that we have "tapped out" the PS4 with a launch title is completely absurd.
Impressive guys, we have gone over 20 pages without a single post blaming the Xbox One for this in some way (well unless i mised it!).
So Dice says it's bullshit and you guys are still arguing about it?
Anything less than 1080p and I won't even consider buying it. Just reeks of lazy hastily put together port.
I mean, it's practically BF3.
This is every fucking Twitter thread ever
*twitter thread*
BREAKING NEWSS4 EATS BABIES according to some random youtuber/journalist
*1000 posts on Gaf, information everywhere, "Sony hates babies and humans" - Kotaku"
*some developer wakes up and says "Nope"
Every
Single
Time
i want to laugh but its also really tragic
7850 can run Crysis on Very High in 1080p without to much problems at around 45fps. With a little optimization i don't see why BF can't run at 1080p60 on the PS4.
Crysis came out quite a while ago.
a little resolution comparison I made a while ago. Maybe that helps get the differences across in res and performance cost.
this.
this means no 1080p60 MP on any battlefield game on next-gen consoles.
You honest to goodness believe DICE has already hit the top ceiling of the console's power with Battlefield 4, even before the console itself releases?
The game is clearly unoptimized, not for "lazy devs" or "incompetence" reasons, but for many others. Budget, time, and/or resource constraints are frequently apparent in cross-gen games like this. Remember DICE has to support several platforms of wildly different power at the same time.
A 7850 runs BF3 at 1080p at 60fps without any problems.
Oh yes, what a handicapped GPU that is.
It also runs Crysis 3 very well, and that looks better than BF4.
1080p60fps it is then?
I mean Crysis 3, and it's still the best looking game out there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8G78D_OXgY
maybe the xbox one cannot run BF4 with "60 fps & 1080p" and EA dont want big difference between two versions ?
a poor cpu can bottleneck the gpu though.
But BF4 doesn't run in 720p. Try not to act so hurt.Bashing Wii U makes you feel better about playing games at 720p until 2020?
Graphics fidelity.
Resolution.
Frame-rate.
...pick two.
Why not all of them?
Gemüsepizza;77898545 said:How exactly is resolution affected by CPU power? This is a GPU thing. And there are no netbooks with 8-core-Jaguars. Going with a multiple low-power CPU cores is a good idea when you have TDP limits.
Between this thread and the IGN one I'll be set for entertainment till ARR early access starts tomorrow.
Sony in 2006 said:PS3 uses the Blu-ray format for gaming, giving developers 50 GB of high-definition storage on a single disc, while Microsoft's 9 GB DVD gaming format is an obstacle for storing HD content. Furthermore, Microsoft's announced HD games patch is really just a compatibility feature -- upscaling lower-resolution content does not make it Full HD (1080p), something that PS3 can do out of the box
Weak CPU -> Some GPU resources need to be reserved for GPGPU duties -> less GPU resources available for graphics -> 720p
People should stop comparing ps4 to similarly spec'ed pc. A system is more than sum of its parts. If not, every pc with the same CPU and graphics card should perform exact same, right?
Unfinished game on £350 console doesn't match up to Ultra PC settings. I wonder why.