Dash Kappei
Not actually that important
Always online = true
Blocking used games = not really, but in a sense they will.
Blocking used games = not really, but in a sense they will.
Well, yes and no.
I think in this case no. Because online being a requirement would lose them far more customers than it would gain.
Of the customers they do manage to get, most would not buy much digital content given they'd more than likely know that that content is useless now and in the future without a connection. Even more so if and when Microsoft shuts down those Live servers.
I mean, I've bought around 50 arcade games and a handful of games on demand, some DLC etc etc. no fucking way in hell will I buy much if at all on this new Xbox if I know a connection is required. I'm the customer Microsoft wants, and they wouldn't get much out of me if they go through with this.
So again, there is literally no monetary value in this for Microsoft. So you can't have MS haters on their high horse on one hand claiming Microsoft are an evil money hungry organization, but then they can fully believe Microsoft would make an anti consumer move that makes them NO money.
Surely you see how illogical that is?
MS staff response to any rumorsThe fact that Microsoft hasn't debunked these rumors, is saying things. I can't even understand why they want to do this. Specially used game blocking, that is very stupid. And always on is even stupider. Not everyone has a reliable connection. So people with spotty connections are going to have trouble, even playing a "single player" game?
The full interview make me feel this company run by idiot
MS staff response to any rumors
(And that's why adam orth get fired because he do give a fuck about medias)
I'm out of guesses for EA then. Maybe a new IP? Still, you confirmed that the two EA franchises I really care about (BF and ME)won't be exclusive so that's good news.nurp
MS staff response to any rumors
.gif[IMG]
(And that's why adam orth get fired because he do give a fuck about medias)[/QUOTE]
Amazing.
If somehow this is true, which I still don't believe, then I'm 99% certain I'm getting a PS4 instead. Before I was going to wait and see, but always-online and NUG are a combo that is too much for me. Not to mention I'm looking forward to a lot of stuff on the PS4 anyway.
Microsoft would really have to blow me away with some sort of game or feature for me to pass on the PS4 in lieu of the Nextbox. I have no idea what that is, because it's not Halo or Gears anymore. Would have to be a new, exclusive IP.
I hope it's true just so we can have a laugh.
Do you really want it? Sorry but why you want something like this?
Only trolls want next Xbox fail (or Wii U fail).
Entertainment
While I think most everyone is just out for the trolling angle, there are the angles that they just haven't liked Microsoft as of late and wants to see them shoot their foot off with a shotgun, and related to that there's the angle that if they're seriously considering always online AT ALL better to "rip the bandaid off" and get it over with, rather than let them build up marketshare then deploy it if they should ever become effectively the only choice. Which is also a case for why Sony and Nintendo still need competition (or at least each other) so we hopefully don't see one of them do it either.Do you really want it? Sorry but why you want something like this?
Only trolls want next Xbox fail (or Wii U fail).
I know one thing... I will definitely be joining any and all vocal anti-MS team if they go through with this. Hope Microsoft fanboys are prepared for my mouth 'cause I am going to be eviscerating Microsoft if they go through with this crap. For an entire generation.
I don't think anyone would argue this move would get them more customers. The argument is that it would force a substantial number of previously offline consumers online. These consumers would be more easily advertised to and at least able to partake on MS's online revenue streams which are likely to be the money makers for MS going forward.
You're making an assumption that consumers are going to see the longview on this. How many customers really care whether or not they can play their games 10-15 years down the road? The conscience consumer is not the norm. If anything, with games available at the push of a button, people are likely going to purchase more (Or at least that would be the line of logic from MS).
There is a big difference between any consumer and a high value consumer for most businesses. You are a high value consumer to MS, but a lot of consumers are not. A consumer that buys a console, and a few games a year is making MS very little money. A consumer who buys a console, an xbox live subscription, DLC, rents movies, ect, is making MS a lot of money. If MS can force enough of those low value consumers into connecting their Xbox's, they'll have access to and therefore be more likely to partake in those services and become high value customers. It isn't about you. You're already where MS wants you. It's about the wider market. MS can afford to lose a bunch of low value customers if the numbers show they'll be transforming some of them into high value customers in the transaction.
That's what I fear most, Microsoft having that special combination of being brazen AND clever that lets them not only pull this shit but get away with it. Hopefully people acknowledge it's not really that essential (and is technically less featured as a phone still works offline if the programs don't need it) and avoid it, or at least Sony whips up a good marketing campaign to make people want that instead. Or Nintendo manages to wake up and start kicking ass there.I honestly fear MS is going to try this and get away with it because they'll offer it in a 200 dollar subsidized console* and people used to paying way more for a data plan and phone will jump in rabidly.
*with 2 year 25/30 dollar mandatory Gold fee, of course. The system will be useless without it.
I wouldn't put it past them after their stupid decision with Windows 8 and forcing consumers to use that new interface. Microsoft has been a bit of a disappointment lately. Hopefully these rumors are false, but it also sounds like something Microsoft would do.
Always online = true
Blocking used games = not really, but in a sense they will.
I guess you're right in a sense.
But they would lose high value customers like myself, on the off chance they MAY turn some low value into high value.
Still doesn't seem worth it.
The assumption, whether it's accurate or not, seems to be that the same 25 million guys paying $60-$120 a year for Live Gold's P2P matchmaking and Netflix app unlock will also roll with no used/a significant DLC pass.
The fact that Microsoft hasn't debunked these rumors, is saying things. I can't even understand why they want to do this. Specially used game blocking, that is very stupid. And always on is even stupider. Not everyone has a reliable connection. So people with spotty connections are going to have trouble, even playing a "single player" game?
Imagine if MS money hatted Madden for 720. That with always online (?) and EAs exclusive NFL liscence. My hate for that franchise would reach critical mass.
Madden for US territory, Fifa for everyone else. Would be a massive draw to the 720.
Imagine if MS money hatted Madden for 720. That with always online (?) and EAs exclusive NFL liscence. My hate for that franchise would reach critical mass.
Well I can only speak for myself but I think it goes both ways, if Microsoft really locks down FIFA to the 720 it wouldn't be a push for me to get a 720 but rather a push for me to abandon FIFA and play PES exclusively again
I just can't see Madden only being on Durango, especially now that EA has completely abandoned Nintendo. EA's been bleeding money for years (Madden, Fifa, and BF keep them going)and I think the only way they could afford something like that is if MS bought them outright.This may just be urban legend, but I had the impression that the deals EA had with the NFL (or the players union) prohibited platform exclusivity like that.
Right, Madden players wouldn't have that option. Unless the deal allows Sony to make an NFL game or something.
So many conflicting rumours I wish MS would just reveal the console already.
Madden for US territory, Fifa for everyone else. Would be a massive draw to the 720.
Madden for US territory, Fifa for everyone else. Would be a massive draw to the 720.
So since people are ignoring this I'm guessing his tag is true and he most likely doesn't know anything?
Is this operating under the idea of an EA exclusive? Because, uhh, FALLOUT IS NOT EA.
Not only is Fallout owned by Bethesda now, but it was originally created BECAUSE EA had a stake in Wasteland and it was Brian Fargo's way of getting around it, a spiritual successor rather than a direct one.
Still, Mass Effect could make sense. EA owns it, Microsoft originally published, and I imagine of the series that people may've migrated to PC for as they got better computers this is one of the games they most likely stuck through with on 360 (the other probably being CoD just for online play with friends.)
Yep.crazy buttocks is legit so I'm guessing the rumors are real.
The industry is fucked; EA and Microsoft will kill it.