Always online = need cable/cable set top box?
(Makes since if the rumors are true)
Outside of America cable is not so popular this would be more suicidal then the always on, I know only 2 of my friends that have it.
Always online = need cable/cable set top box?
(Makes since if the rumors are true)
Madden for US territory, Fifa for everyone else. Would be a massive draw to the 720.
Well, ME DID come out reliably around every 2 years, so if they started ME4 right away similar to 2 and 3 it WOULD be ready shortly after launch. Hell, even the more probable extra year of development we'd probably see it when the system's a year old.Mass Effect 4 (or whatever it'll be called) is probably still to early in development for them to make any deals on it. I wouldn't be surprised if they did though, like you said Microsoft published the original, had a timed exclusive on the second, and heavily promoted the third. It's sales are more one sided than any other EA game (off the top of my head) so I could see them doing that as an exclusive (timed or other wise) before something like Battlefield 4.
Respawn's game makes sense, and Bioware has a new IP so it could be that as well.
crazy buttocks is legit so I'm guessing the rumors are real.
The industry is fucked; EA and Microsoft will kill it.
damn solidsnakex was dead on....which exclusive have ms scored?Acti = no
EA = Yesss, with a big one........
Always online and no used games?! Yikes!!
I can't see myself supporting that. And the thought of MS and EA leading the industry down that path is frightening.
Not thatonwe.
please do it so it can make my decision to buy a ps4 easier
crazy buttocks is legit so I'm guessing the rumors are real.
The industry is fucked; EA and Microsoft will kill it.
NFL wouldn't allow it. And it doesn't really make sense for MSFT.Madden?
I can only imagine what chicanery is going on in the backdrop of such a decision that would make it beneficial to Microsoft.
Higher royalty rates from publishers due to cutting 2nd-hand and piracy out like they've always wanted?
I don't think they would even need to charge higher royalty rates, because Microsoft would be getting more License fees paid due to more games being sold.
I'm hoping this does happen at this point. I'm really curious if
the gamers who are dead set against this will not buy it and stick
to their convictions or waiver when they see Halo 5 and the new Gears of War and
buy it.
Just remember, the bed you make is usually the bed you lay
in.
The gamers who have that conviction will not be a large enough group to make a dent to the bottom line.
The gamers who have that conviction will not be a large enough group to make a dent to the bottom line.
Nonsense.
Yep.
I'm stocking up on retro games.
My iPhone games work in airplane mode. Also, they were $0.99 and I don't expect a cartridge slot on my phone.So basically, if this is true and people don't like it, then it's not so difficult.. Buy the competitors machine, in this case PS4 (or Wii U
But if this is true and people or mass market does not mind it, then what is the big problem? We are already experiencing this situation on the mobile market to a certain extent..
Personally, it will not affect me. I'm always connected, I don't buy used games and I don't really borrow games (1-2 the last 10 years).
But yeah, if you don't support this, give your money to someone else and hope that Nintendo and Sony are strong enough to maintain or succeed and show MS that they are wrong.
Still, you can bet that MS will continue to secure deals like this ones in the future..
But yeah, if you don't support this, give your money to someone else and hope that Nintendo and Sony are strong enough to maintain or succeed and show MS that they are wrong.
You better hope so because if this is indeed true, it will do a very good
job of destroying the video game industry.
Of my 41 years on this earth have I not been as concerned as a gamer as I am now
with what MS is about to(allegedly) do.
I am telling you gamers, absolutely do not support this if it's true.
The line in the sand is fast approaching.....
This is... a slightly less usual source, but probably one of the more public statements from someone actually directly related to games.
Source: http://www.nowgamer.com/news/1897054/next_xbox_will_not_be_compatible_with_second_hand.html
Always online and no used games?! Yikes!!
I can't see myself supporting that. And the thought of MS and EA leading the industry down that path is frightening.
You are in here for a surprise. At the end of the day, gamers want to consume, no matter what.
Don't do it, Microsoft. Don't kill yourself.
I don't think they would even need to charge higher royalty rates, because Microsoft would be getting more License fees paid due to more games being sold.
It'll only take for one of the big publishers to support this with an exclusive title and the other one would be boned.
Just imagine if Activision just went fuckit and made COD exclusive to machines with DRM?
Sony would have to offer up the facility and before you know it all games would be like that.
Posts like this make little to no sense to me...
My iPhone games work in airplane mode. Also, they were $0.99 and I don't expect a cartridge slot on my phone.
I'm hoping this does happen at this point. I'm really curious if
the gamers who are dead set against this will not buy it and stick
to their convictions or waiver when they see Halo 5 and the new Gears of War and
buy it.
Just remember, the bed you make is usually the bed you lay
in.
It probably depends on how important sharing and used games really are to most gamers, though this is the inherent flaw I'd think: if it were very important to many then there's no way to win, you'd either lose them as customers straight up, or they'd simply buy games far less frequently which on the surface IS better... until you remember that a lot of new game purchases are also fueled by used game sales, so I imagine at best it's a wash anyway.The majority of the gaming population would buy in without even realising what is occurring. It seems like it's only a vocal minority who oppose these restrictions.
UK aside I kind of think Europe's a lost cause anyway, something like this would (I'd hope) just bury them entirely, aren't they already beat by PS3 there?I hope "big" exclusive is Madden so I can laugh my ass of with the rest of Europe.
I hope "big" exclusive is Madden so I can laugh my ass of with the rest of Europe.
I am sticking with ME"4" as the most likely one, it's possible MS still has a stake in that series and wants something for the core, especially as now that I think about it the most effective way to win them over probably IS to make an exclusive specifically for them, hoping most of the naysayers give in and get their system and get invested anyway.
Too bad ME3 burned that bridge, though I don't doubt quite a few would want to jump in anyway.
damn solidsnakex was dead on....which exclusive have ms scored?
I think Respawn's game is the obvious one. It fits with what MS tried to do this generation. They went after a new IP from Epic instead of the next UNREAL Tournament. They also secured Bioshock as a timed exclusive. They went after exclusives by big name developers in an attempt to land the next big thing instead of just targeting known franchises.