Well, I am not sure it is Marx's fault that even the idea of basic income is being tested in the Holy Almighty West like a dog tests the bathtub when it is time to wash: avoiding it like the plague, god forbid we have any usable data out of it instead of dismissing it out of spite.
We have data and
still dismiss it. That's the hilariously tragic thing.
30 years of pilots and studies and the memes of its ineffectiveness run strong. It's not even an issue of scale and tests that create dissent:
the idea itself is given dissent despite constant, observable trends. Will the US move with Y Combinators pilot or the Economic Security Project, the latter of which is a $10,000,000 project? Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeell no.
Sorry for the above being a tangent, but I can't help myself. For the more direct topic at hand, it is unfortunate to see what's unfolding in Venezuela. You would assume a sea of protests and marches would mean the society would get its shit together, but it appears to be doubling down on the insolubility. Tyrants are tyrants, and you could make a case that any ism is prone to being hijacked. Capitalism gets hijacked in a different way than Communism and Socialism: there's no man at the "heart" in power, but the market itself gets hijacked. Neoliberalism is this and how America has a corporatism at the moment.
That said, it's much easier to hijack the system politically as the leader of a nation than economic rigging, hence why when the parasitic activity happens, it's a much quicker metastasization of chaos. Tyranny comes fastest through established political orders, after all.