Polioliolio
Member
Can we please get some scientists and inventors on the bills please?
Also, pro Tubman.
Also, pro Tubman.
Enough do
I got the point of that thread, but it was a point that can pretty much be ignored, IMO, so I'm going to mock it. It wasn't a great read and was mostly full of eyerolley examples that don't apply 99% of the time, were so egregious that I actually agreed with the people exhibiting the "smugness," or were so rarified and strange that they pertained to the weird reactions of a select few and not some sort of "smugness scourge" within the left.That's not what that thread was about, really.
Can we please get some scientists and inventors on the bills please?
Also, pro Tubman.
Ya'll need to stop being so smug about this kinda thing, apparently that's the real problem here.
/s
Just replace Andrew Jackson with Michael Jackson.
Read a history book man. That is a ridiculous comparison.Why not Rosa Parks?
Enough do
Just replace Andrew Jackson with Michael Jackson.
GWC on the $50.Can we please get some scientists and inventors on the bills please?
Also, pro Tubman.
lmfao. Read it in that type of voice, too.
Yup cause this is how all republicans think.
I got the point of that thread, but it was a point that can pretty much be ignored, IMO, so I'm going to mock it. It wasn't a great read and was mostly full of eyerolley examples that don't apply 99% of the time, were so egregious that I actually agreed with the people exhibiting the "smugness," or were so rarified and strange that they pertained to the weird reactions of a select few and not some sort of "smugness scourge" within the left.
And here, the salient thing in conversations with people disappointed that the North won the Civil War is not liberals' "tone." Smugness is the least of what racists who want to roll back the end of slavery deserve, and telling liberals to attenuate their anger towards such people is pure tone policing.
Put mlk on the fifty. Why are people undermining Harriet's human rights record? Other than the Underground Railroad, Tubman has a great record of women's rights and she was a spy in the civil war. Literally the definition of an American hero and people undermine that.well why not make a new bill, maybe a 40 dollar bill?
This line of thinking is so binary. Being on money is a celebration of a persons achievements. Native Americans have gotten the short end of the stick with being marginalized and put as mascots for teams. (One of the teams having a super racist name) It would be nice to put them on something positive.It would be an insult to Native Americans to put them on money.
This line of thinking is so binary. Being on money is a celebration of a persons achievements. Native Americans have gotten the short end of the stick with being marginalized and put as mascots for teams. (One of the teams having a super racist name) It would be nice to put them on something positive.
The treasury could check with the leaders of the Native American/American Indian communities around the country and see if they are cool with being patronized.Sounds kind of patronizing.
The treasury could check with the leaders of the Native American/American Indian communities around the country and see if they are cool with being patronized.
What's the percentage of Republicans who aren't white people again?
Non-Hispanic whites accounted for 89% of Republican self-identifiers nationwide in 2012, while accounting for 70% of independents and 60% of Democrats. Over one-fifth of Democrats (22%) were black, while 16% of independents were Hispanic.
I don't like that Jackson is still going to be on the back of the bill. What the fuck is the point then?
89% of Republicans identify as White non-hispanic so I guess around 11%
I've seen some of my staunch democrat friends share this article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/post...harriet-tubman-and-all-women-off-the-20-bill/
Keep Harriet Tubman and all women off the $20 bill
Harriet Tubman did not fight for capitalism, free trade or competitive markets.
The treasury could check with the leaders of the Native American/American Indian communities around the country and see if they are cool with being patronized.
You assuming what they would want also sounds kind of patronizing.
Huh. The only stuff I've seen from Facebook conservatives on Tubman is memes like this:
Which is why I think they should check with said communities instead of deciding what they would like for them.There's a history of the US govt depicting Native American figures and upsetting the Native American community, that's why people have this perception of the situation.
Yeah. Reminds me of an article where a journalist got mad that the US Army is naming their weaponry after native Americans, apparently not knowing that the tribes are actually consulted beforehand.Which is why I think they should check with said communities instead of deciding what they would like for them.
Hold on a second, I've seen that picture before. Isn't that Stagecoach Mary and not Tubman?Huh. The only stuff I've seen from Facebook conservatives on Tubman is memes like this:
Ftfyfunny thing about this is Andrew Jackson was the first Democratic president
Ftfy
Can we please get some scientists and inventors on the bills please?
Also, pro Tubman.
Americans wouldn't even be able to name ONE Native American.
Huh. The only stuff I've seen from Facebook conservatives on Tubman is memes like this:
Frederick Douglass has too many bad ass portraits not to be on some kind of currency.
funny thing about this is Andrew Jackson was the first Democrat president
You know when someone famous dies and people pretend that they were their biggest fans? This sorta reminds me of that, now a bunch of people seem to think Andrew Jackson was the hottest shit in town out of nowhere.