TheWorthyEdge
Member
Question I have though. When you are the first person to discover something, will others be able to see who discovered it?
Question I have though. When you are the first person to discover something, will others be able to see who discovered it?
//#include <multiplayer>
// As it was incomplete, it qualifies as buggy code, but yet, it is a commented feature (for now)... What Am I? A Future Update or just fake code by some dude who thinks he's funny.
int main()
{
...
}
Question I have though. When you are the first person to discover something, will others be able to see who discovered it?
What you're describing is Dark Souls, not Journey.
You see people in real time in Journey.
I'm watching both their streams right now. They are both in the exact same spot on the same planet, both have PS Plus (one guy even signed up just to make sure this wasn't an issue), but of their games say online services active, they can't see any trace of each other.
I'd call this pretty definitive.
This is stupid, and should not be getting a pass, people is wasting $60 in a game where you dont know what kind of multiplayer you have..
Totally absurd if you ask me.
Perhaps the devs shouldn't have waited until literally the day before release to at best, vaguely specify that there's no MP after two years of straight up saying that there is but without things like PSN/Steam names. Including but not limited to saying that you can see the model of other players. They need to just say, there's no multiplayer and stop being so damn vague I mean damn these guys are as humble as CD Projeckt but quite terrible at actually communicating answers to direct simple questions... ಠ_ಠ
I'm happy about this. I don't want to see anyone else playing. People tend to be little shits and break immersion, I'd rather avoid them.
This is stupid, and should not be getting a pass, people is wasting $60 in a game where you dont know what kind of multiplayer you have..
Totally absurd if you ask me.
Yes, already been proven out in the wild.
But how old are those sources. That Tweet is from August 8th. I am optimistic something may be patched in... I just don't think it is something we have at launch.
Just wondering, what are your stance on the situation about the game?Man the grasping at straws in defense.
"Maybe it's NAT"
"Maybe because one guy doesn't have PS+ even though everyone was rejoicing that you don't need it for this game"
"Maybe because planetary orbits aren't synced so they're technically in different places around the sun"
"Maybe they were on different instance servers"
"Maybe launch load"
etc. etc.
AND even if all of those things are wrong and the game simply doesn't have multi at all, the narrative is "oh we knew this all along, here are numerous quotes that I'll say aren't vague and cagey even though they all clearly imply that it should be possible to see other players."
Well, I don't think anything productive is going to come from this thread at this point.
Both sides have made up their mind
I thought it was a given that there was no actual multiplayer in this game.
That's not how it works. The seed is the same for everyone, but it's also local. The seed is not read off a server. It's on the disk and your hard drive.
Regardless of what he meant, he needs to come out NOW and say definitively "yes, you can see other players in the world," or "no, you cannot see other players in the world."
There is no way to misinterpret either of those statements. But I'm certainly not alone in reading his tweet as "it's highly unlikely that you'll run into anyone else, but you can do it"
https://twitter.com/NoMansSky/status/762688708764135425If thats the case, they should come clean about it.
Honestly all I care about. Thats great.
And can you name things whatever you want?
However, developer Hello Games has revealed that other players will look different from anything else in the game especially if you spot them walking on a planet.
"You effectively see their suit, actually," said Murray. "So you won't know what's inside. It still won't answer for people whether you are an alien or whether you are a human or what you look like."
Actually no.
Psytokat's NMS menu says he's Online.
It says "Lost Connection Status" in the Thesadcactus's NMS screen though.
You can just test this out thats pretty much the whole pointIf this blows up enough, people who know what they're doing can test it out and we can get a more conclusive answer.
The messaging surrounding this game has been so wishy washy. Rather than answer things straight it's as if they don't want to admit certain things so provide a really unspecific answer.
Doesn't matter if it's a tiny % chance it could happen, clearly there's 0% chance it can happen so why not say that in the first place.
I'm trying to figure out which is more annoying, the folks blowing this out of proportion or the folks trying to sweep it under the rug as a non-issue.
he literally said you could see other players, so is this a lobby thing or something
http://www.digitalspy.com/gaming/ps4/feature/a801705/your-biggest-no-mans-sky-questions-answered/
https://twitter.com/NoMansSky/status/762688708764135425
I mean he does say "is not a multiplayer game."
I do agree it could be done in a more official way other than the developers Twitter account.
"You effectively see their suit, actually," said Murray. "So you won't know what's inside. It still won't answer for people whether you are an alien or whether you are a human or what you look like."
Big deal. It's a single player experience through and through
he literally said you could see other players, so is this a lobby thing or something
http://www.digitalspy.com/gaming/ps4/feature/a801705/your-biggest-no-mans-sky-questions-answered/
I cant see people buying this game mainly because of that when they say that its incredible small chance of meeting people. Maybe its possible to coordinate, but then they shouldnt have said that its an extremely small chance, thats underselling it a lot.Perhaps it was simple marketing to be vague about the online aspect. They know that the vast majority of sales are at the launch, before people know for certain.
No, instead of saying "there's no multiplayer," they still stuck with the implication that it's possible. Plus all the quotes over the years instead of saying straight up seeing multiple players is impossible.
I've got the game. I've logged four hours. I'm enjoying the hell out of it and no this doesnt bother me one jot but to people bemoaning it, again and again the 'It's incredibly unlikely but possible' line was implied or said. I'm not surprised people aren't thrilled. To them I say I hope you still enjoy the game, its great.
This is the tragic part. On the slim chance you do actually come across another player, you might not even notice. In-game, other player ships won't be tagged with a player's name or any other indicator that lets you know they're a human pilot and not an AI.
"You effectively see their suit actually," Murray said. "So you won't know what's inside. It still won't answer for people whether you are an alien or whether you are a human or what you look like."
"Like many games that you have at the moment," Murray said in an interview with Game Informer, "where you are flying around with an open lobby, people are coming into that lobby and leaving it – like if you play Watch Dogs or something like that. Effectively, we have players joining your discrete space. We're not trying to make an MMO where you can play with literally 60,000 people on screen."
https://twitter.com/NoMansSky/status/762688708764135425
I mean he does say "is not a multiplayer game."
I do agree it could be done in a more official way other than the developers Twitter account.
It is only a big deal because the developers have been very vague about some aspects of the game not only the multiplazer.
Because the time of day is stored locally. The game actually pauses when you pause the game.
those are local variables, not server
If it's possible then it's possible. And quite honestly that's precisely what the messaging has been. You can see another player but it's a extremely rare occurrence.
I don't see what's confusing about that at all.
How about from the developer's mouth?