Blame Sony.
The ball is in their court to comment
Blame Sony.
Way to prove your own point.
I chuckledThe ball is in their court to comment
I think this is the most pathetic post in this embarrassing thread, and that's quite an achievement.
1 in quintillion, lucky.I don't care about the whole multiplayer thing, that's not why I got this game. However, just because 2 people happen to find each other, based off of their random starter systems that could have just happen to be close by, doesn't mean they lied about the number of planets. It means these people got lucky. So criticising that part of the game is pointless.
"After careful and thorough considerations, we decided that a multiplayer component in No Man's Sky does not bring the kind of value PlayStation customers have come to expect."The ball is in their court to comment
"After careful and thorough considerations, we decided that a multiplayer component in No Man's Sky was not the best value proposition for the players"
Recently posted, interesting stuff, time-stamp included. Would love to know if real.
Recently posted, interesting stuff, time-stamp included. Would love to know if real.
Blame Sony.
Who else has a boxed copy?
this doesn't even make sense"But we will make it possible trough the PS Now version".
That's what I've been saying.
It's been mentioned many times how vast the galaxy is, and how unlikely it was for people to see the same planets.
Now it turns out it's not unlikely at all, and it might just be smoke and mirrors.
I know people have educated me on what procedural generation is, and that in theory two people with the same "seed" will have the exact same planets, but again I'd assume that there are millions of different "seeds" no??
"After careful and thorough considerations, we decided that a multiplayer component in No Man's Sky does not bring the kind of value PlayStation customers have come to expect."
"But we will make it possible trough the PS Now version".
LmaoI always do
I don't care about the whole multiplayer thing, that's not why I got this game. However, just because 2 people happen to find each other, based off of their random starter systems that could have just happen to be close by, doesn't mean they lied about the number of planets. It means these people got lucky. So criticising that part of the game is pointless.
day 1 patch
okay this got meday 1 patch
It seems you had no pertinent point but to come into the thread and imply how above it all you are, in which case, no one cares. Secondly, I find it baffling that you felt the need to inform people that you don't know what a shill is but you do you. ಠ_ಠI honestly don't give a shit about this game. It's interesting conceptually but not for me, though everything I've read here on GAF points toward the likelihood of actual multiplayer being a pipe dream, I've read of the size and instances preventing meet ups becoming possible so this current debacle doesn't really phase me.
That's got sweet fuck all to do with you being a Ubisoft shill though.
That's what I've been saying.
It's been mentioned many times how vast the galaxy is, and how unlikely it was for people to see the same planets.
Now it turns out it's not unlikely at all, and it might just be smoke and mirrors.
I know people have educated me on what procedural generation is, and that in theory two people with the same "seed" will have the exact same planets, but again I'd assume that there are millions of different "seeds" no??
The possibility of this is what made me wanna get this the most honestly. That moment in Journey was awesome so it would've been great to see it here.Can't blame people for being upset. Once two people found each other, it shouldn't have been that difficult to continue the journey together. I know a lot of people who wanted to try that.
A)To suggest that there was never any gaming controversies years before is some hardcore revisionist history B)This is an incredibly tired argument, no one is disrespecting the devs by asking questions about game features that were advertised and repeated verbatim by the developers. A confirmation that the feature was either A)On the CRF B)Coming in a later patch or C)Not working due to server issues would've avoided this entire controversy.Man, this thread is utterly pathetic. I miss the days when people played games because they were fun and not attacked the developer every chance they got because it's not everything they thought it would be. It's just mesmerizing how rude and disrespectful people can be. Grow up
0_0
Please be fake, please be fake...
Man, this thread is utterly pathetic. I miss the days when people played games because they were fun and not attacked the developer every chance they got because it's not everything they thought it would be. It's just mesmerizing how rude and disrespectful people can be. Grow up
Man, this thread is utterly pathetic. I miss the days when people played games because they were fun and not attacked the developer every chance they got because it's not everything they thought it would be. It's just mesmerizing how rude and disrespectful people can be. Grow up
With 18,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets, it does imply that the starter systems are not random or possibly unique...
Thats not 'getting lucky', thats worse than if I hid a grain of sand someplace on the earth and you asked you to find it.
Rather than luck, there is some other mechanism at work to link up so quickly.
Man, this thread is utterly pathetic. I miss the days when people played games because they were fun and not attacked the developer every chance they got because it's not everything they thought it would be. It's just mesmerizing how rude and disrespectful people can be. Grow up
Man, this thread is utterly pathetic. I miss the days when people played games because they were fun and not attacked the developer every chance they got because it's not everything they thought it would be. It's just mesmerizing how rude and disrespectful people can be. Grow up
Someone found me in the game. I get a message on PSN from a complete stranger asking me if I'm on some randomly named planet. I'm like, "wait, okay, where? In the game?"
Then I get a screenshot of the other player's map screen and one of the planets is named "Ceti Alpha V" with the same number of planets and went on to describe the exact same place I started out. The first two systems we played in are identical, weird names and all.
Doubt this is real. The amount of labor required to make this kind of cover up probably out costs what would it be to just print new sleeves.
That's what I think is the most intriguing fact about this news as well. I mean, Sean Murray himself, if I'm not mistaken, said it would be a very rare situation to find another player since it's a so immense universe in-game.
Now it barely released and we have 2 players meeting at the exactly same place in Twitch. It doesn't seems hard at all.
The defense squad is the most embarrassing group here.Man, this thread is utterly pathetic. I miss the days when people played games because they were fun and not attacked the developer every chance they got because it's not everything they thought it would be. It's just mesmerizing how rude and disrespectful people can be. Grow up
By insulting the developers and making fun of Sean? Such a classy way of doing it. I understand people may be frustrated but there are better ways to go about things than hurling insults at the developerIt's like in SFII where people thought Shen Long was unlockable, and people were just discussing it.
Hello Games have clearly said, multiple times that two people in the same place can see each other. All people are doing is trying to figure out if this one feature is in the game or not.
It's like in SFII where people thought Shen Long was unlockable, and people were just discussing it.
Hello Games have clearly said, multiple times that two people in the same place can see each other. All people are doing is trying to figure out if this one feature is in the game or not.
Yeah "practically zero" chance of two players hitting the same planet they said.
Even the playstation blog referenced it here http://blog.us.playstation.com/2015/08/03/35-amazing-things-about-no-mans-sky/
This is my point. And my guess is that most of those people don't even own the gameExcept some people are being pretty volatile about it, that's the problem.
Also pretty shit tbh.While we are on the topic of bugs and or lies about No Man's Sky, check out the games limited edition "dynamic" theme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CWu0rAl-yk
Not so dynamic eh?
By insulting the developers and making fun of Sean? Such a classy way of doing it. I understand people may be frustrated but there are better ways to go about things than hurling insults at the developer
How's Derek Smart feeling right about now?
The defense squad is the most embarrassing group here.
1 in quintillion, lucky.
With 18,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets, it does imply that the
starter systems are not random or possibly unique...
Thats not 'getting lucky', thats worse than if I hid a grain of sand someplace on the earth and you asked you to find it.
Rather than luck, there is some other mechanism at work to link up so quickly.
Everyone starts in the same galaxy, and a long ways from the center. Instead of rolling the dice on a 1 in 18 quintillion chance, all new players spawn in a "shell" surrounding the center of the galaxy. And maybe not all planets in that "shell" are valid starting locations due to being too hostile, too dead, etc. etc. Maybe there are only 100 million worlds that players can spawn at. And then you think, if 1 million people are playing the game right now, that means at most each of them are only 100 planets apart.
Something along those lines.
Underrated post.Any Man's Guess