What does the term review bomb mean in the context of the OP?
This.
This.
This
1000 times this.
Denuvo compared to GFWL, SecuRom, Tages, UWP, or StarForce, has been pretty tame and hasn't yet actively inconvenienced me.
Future-wise yeah I do however completely share the concerns expressed before, and trust me I'd rather Denuvo wasn't there either.
But even that is a far cry from stuff we've had before like SecuRom or Tages - which had more immediate and finite activation limits.
As far as I am concerned though I made that choice of purchase for both Sonic and LiS having been informed of it, and it was made with my eyes open.
On the other hand however, those that would whine and say that it doesn't matter, or that a game shouldn't be punished for the actions of the publisher, the claims of "entitlement" that we've had in prior threads etc (ah yes, how dare a consumer take an opinion on how they spend their own hard earned money), are to me simply corporate apologists.
I'd be very curious to see if many of these same users actually regularly play on PC...
Denuvo compared to GFWL, SecuRom, Tages, UWP, or StarForce, has been pretty tame and hasn't yet actively inconvenienced me.
Future-wise yeah I do however completely share the concerns expressed before, and trust me I'd rather Denuvo wasn't there either.
But even that is a far cry from stuff we've had before like SecuRom or Tages - which had more immediate and finite activation limits.
Why would Denuvo dissuade people from buying a game? Honest question. Especially on Steam, why would it stop average joe Steam user from buying the game?
Once Denuvo gets cracked on these games, and they will, the purpose of Denuvo in those games becomes moot and the funds wasted on Denuvo would be for nothing.
Could you with absolute certainty say that the PC delay of 2 weeks due to the implementation of Denuvo? Couldn't it just as likely be the same strategy puplishers use so that people do buy the console version or double dip?For starters, LiS's pc version wasn't delayed in 2 weeks for adding fucking denuvo. That's why the difference in the reviews
Could you with absolute certainty say that the PC delay of 2 weeks due to the implementation of Denuvo? Couldn't it just as likely be the same strategy puplishers use so that people do buy the console version or double dip?
You just don't get it uh?
I for one am shocked that the majority of consumers doesn't know or care about an un-intrusive anti-piracy measure
I'm not saying Denuvo could not be a problem down the line, mind you. But it's really not surprising most people don't know or care.
Yeah, millions of pirates bought Before the Storm, they simply couldn't wait the whole 8 hour that it took to get crackedI am happy to see Denuvo protecting games like this. It definitely forces certain group of people to buy games instead of pirating them. A few days of protection is a big deal.
En what do i don't get?
Is this really highly successful? Not doubting it, I just have no idea how much a successful game on Steam usually sells in 2~3 days.
Yeah, millions of pirates bought Before the Storm, they simply couldn't wait the whole 8 hour that it took to get cracked
In short giving negative reviews not because game is bad but because you didn't like move that dev/publiher made.
Is this happening to Sonic Mania?
That's what I thought, but it doesn't seem to apply in this case. People are giving negative reviews because of a problem they have with the game.
Offline issue wasn't caused by Denuvo i think and it was fixed in first 24 hours but people are still leaving negative reviews.
Factually, it did affect sales. Not sure why you think this proves otherwise. What a hilarious jump of logic.So much for all that bs that BernardoOne was spouting about effecting sales.
Fair enough, I thought that people's issue with the game was that it included Denuvo, but perhaps I was mistaken?
Both games use Denuvo as way of protection and both games run fine without major issues caused by Denuvo, and yet you only see it mentioned in sonic reviews So i really don't know what is the issue anymore
Is this happening to Sonic Mania?
That's what I thought, but it doesn't seem to apply in this case. People are giving negative reviews because of a problem they have with the game.
Both games use Denuvo as way of protection and both games run fine without major issues caused by Denuvo, and yet you only see it mentioned in sonic reviews So i really don't know what is the issue anymore
The main issue with Denuvo requiring online activation is what may happen to these games when you try to play them several years from now, not anything which affects them today.Given how many people say it is an issue, but only do so in games in which they are aware of it, perhaps a safe conclusion would be people only say it is an issue if they are aware of it? I know correlation doesn't equal causation, but I feel it's a fairly safe assumption.
Isolated bad reviews don't mean anything, especially when you did not have to purchase the product to review it - which is something that Steam requires.People are giving negative reviews for everything all the time. [...]
So much for all that bs that BernardoOne was spouting about effecting sales.
I doubt most even know what Denuvo is. GAF isnt the best sample size. Way too niche.Congrats to Square and Sega on the success. Interesting to see Denuvo wasn't enough to dissuade folks, in addition to the Sonic delay (console versions dropped 2 weeks earlier).