Support NeoGAF

[JoeyJungle]

Still no update displayed on their article. Incredible.

They already said they were suspect of the video capture in the article.

 

[Kane1345]

Seriously DF you should update your article on EG to reflect this. It's really something people should know before making a decision.

 

[Chumpion]

People at Digital Flounder are undeniably leading experts in game footage capture. I do have a humble suggestion for the future, though: When you begin capturing, check that the brightness, contrast and sharpness of the images look about right.

I know this is a very advanced technique, requiring highly developed central nervous system capabilities (for example, a WORKING BRAIN) - but I have faith in you.

 

[NoirVisage]

Threads like this show the dark side of NeoGAF. Some crazy stuff in here...

THIS is the darkside of Neogaf? If you're serious, you are a bigger console warrior than you yourself realize.

 

[Guerilla]

too bad , not many read the article

Most people even if they read the whole article they'd immediately ignore everything in it and come to the wrong conclusion if they saw those screenshots . It's much easier to persuade with a screenshot comparison than a description.

 

[GashPrex]

Reviewing the other thread and Dark10X comments here (congrats on the job where you can put your "graphics whore" to good use btw) seem to indicate that this thread title is misleading - I know shocking.

 

[Coulomb_Barrier]

I think this is more to do with the controlled environment the analysis was carried out in rather than any wilful deception by DF.

But the article needs updating or this issue explained.

 

[BruiserBear]

Did these mistakes change the blur seen in the PS4 version?

 

[JoeyJungle]

Did these mistakes change the blur seen in the PS4 version?

No just color saturation.

 

[FlutterPuffs]

My first belly laugh of the day, you're beyond clueless.

And explain why I'm beyond clueless.

And you're beyond hopeless, try reading the article.



And the entire thread makes it look like they hid that there could have been anything wrong with their capturing, when they specifically note that there probably WAS something wrong:

Thank you.

If there's one advice I'd give Leadbetter (other than for god's sake, you guys really need better PR for this kind of shit) is that to use much simple words, since apparently some people have zero reading comprehension and these explanations just whooshes by them.

 

[jacksepticeye]

So they half arsed it losing the credibility of the comparison instead of just doing it right?

 

[McValdemar]

More like Ps4 looking worse

Yes, but people even in front of that screens continued to swear that the PS4 version was way better.

Guess it proves that no point in taking pics or video.
People will often see just what they want to see.

 

[Bizazedo]

Naive.

The amount of times mistakes are mistaken for malicious intent is staggering.

 

[darkwing]

I think this is more to do with the controlled environment the analysis was carried out in rather than any wilful deception by DF.

But the article needs updating or this issue explained.

it is already in the article

Right now there's every possibility that it could be a capture situation, but it is worth noting that we saw no such issue on our PC captures and after returning to base, the same equipment produced a perfectly balanced picture on our PlayStation 3.

 

[Y2Kev]

dark, I'm sorry your quote in the thread got pulled out of context and made into an official statement posted on n4g, but we don't need the distortion here.