1920*1080 = 2,073,600
1280*720 = 921,600
2,073,600/921,600 = 2.25 which is 225% more pixels HOLY MOLY!
More implies additive, which isn't correct in your statement. It's 125% more.
1920*1080 = 2,073,600
1280*720 = 921,600
2,073,600/921,600 = 2.25 which is 225% more pixels HOLY MOLY!
In the other thread Greenberg said you can use xbox music which can apparently sync with your mp3s somehow. Sounds like no to me as far as native playback is concerned.Damn. Both Sony and Microsoft greedy for those store purchased backgrounds I imagine. Twats. Could this functionality theoretically be patched in?
MP3 playback surely can?
Those will change depending on what Kinect sees you using for products.
1920*1080 = 2,073,600
1280*720 = 921,600
2,073,600/921,600 = 2.25 which is 225% more pixels HOLY MOLY!
EDIT: Did I do something wrong?
I was reading that the jump from 720p to 1080p is an increase of 225%.
Is that true?
.PS3 has 518,400 pixels (assuming 960x540)
PS4 has 2,073 600 pixels
360 has 624,000 pixels (assuming 1040x600)
Xbone has 921,600 pixels
expanding on this
360 to PS4 = 20% diff
360 to Xbone = 48% diff
Xbone to PS4 = 125% diff
PS3 to PS4 = 300% diff
There will probably be a few more. Sports titles likely (though I expected COD would be a likely 1080p too, so who knows if that will go for all of them). Maybe Skylanders? Haven't heard about the XB1 version.
Nah, there's the usual couple of sports games, and Crimson Dragon.
No.
FIFA and NBA 2k14 are native 1080p, I think.
Not sure about Madden.
1920*1080 = 2,073,600
1280*720 = 921,600
2,073,600/921,600 = 2.25 which is 225% more pixels HOLY MOLY!
EDIT: Did I do something wrong?
1920*1080 = 2,073,600
1280*720 = 921,600
2,073,600/921,600 = 2.25 which is 225% more pixels HOLY MOLY!
EDIT: Did I do something wrong?
No.
FIFA and NBA 2k14 are native 1080p, I think.
Not sure about Madden.
repreorderedKinect is also 1080p !!!. You can skype at full 1080p.
ad backgrounds.
Kinect is also 1080p !!!. You can skype at full 1080p.
Have you ever considered that with that 125% increase of pixels, it's not a 125% increase in fun? In fact, I bet all that time spent allocating resources towards 1080p, IW couldn't fit in as much fun as the 720p versions. Just something to mull over.
100 percent more is 2 times as many pixels. You probably thought 2 times more is 200 percent more. 2.25 times more is 125 percent more.1920*1080 = 2,073,600
1280*720 = 921,600
2,073,600/921,600 = 2.25 which is 225% more pixels HOLY MOLY!
EDIT: Did I do something wrong?
I'm starting to think XB1 can't do 60 fps at higher than 720p with deferred engines. Remember that weird golf game. That runs at 720p too and looks bad even for current-gen.
Wanna bet this a 60 fps title too?
Kinect is also 1080p !!!. You can skype at full 1080p.
i bet PS4 can't even use USENET
ad backgrounds.
I think it can.holy shit, does this thing even play games?
If it could, it would be in 1080p.
The 300% increase from PS3 to PS4 is going to blow Playstation only gamers' minds.
1080p on Skype doesn't matter if your connection is garbage.
Hold up, now. I've seen this "people won't care" stuff quite enough, and I haven't caught up on the rest of the thread yet. The people who don't care about resolution/which console ruins their games the best are NOT early adopters. So for this game, it really does matter because a large portion of people buying these new toys DO care.Pretty sure many COD players don't care (game currently is in sub-HD on current gen) but the game running worse on the console/brand the game is more popularly known for is messed up.
This gen's "Madden 30 FPS" news IMO.
I have a funny feeling Xbone will look better in screen comparisons (unless you view them at 1080p). The PS4 is not 125% more powerful anyway you look at it. I'm guessing Xbone will be better in a few ways to somewhat make up for the raw pixel pushing that the PS4 can do. Maybe even better models, tessellation or textures.
John Carmack: the two consoles are functionally identical in terms of what they can do.
Its almost amazing how close they are in capabilities, how common they are, Carmack said. And that the capabilities that they give are essentially the same.
ad backgrounds.
Wait..is this real? If so..ieuw.
Both consoles are 100% capable of playing MP3s. Why they decided to not allow it at launch is the big question.Damn. Both Sony and Microsoft greedy for those store purchased backgrounds I imagine. Twats. Could this functionality theoretically be patched in?
MP3 playback surely can?
Was he lying or misrepresenting the obvious truth?
Hold on is this for real!?!?ad backgrounds.
Hold on is this for real!?!?
That it is not obvious it's a joke is sad.Wait..is this real? If so..ieuw.
if it were any more real, it would be real.
why? you don't like doritos?Wait..is this real? If so..ieuw.
Both consoles are 100% capable of playing MP3s. Why they decided to not allow it at launch is the big question.
of course not
A crap sounding song in lossless quality is still a crap sounding song. A good sounding song in 128kbps (highly compressed) is still a good sounding song.
A crap movie with terrible special effects in 4k resolution is still a crappy looking movie. A really great looking movie displayed in 480i is still a really great looking movie, despite the resolution disparity.
Why don't people apply the same logic to games?
Resolution means nothing in and of itself.
Deferred renderers need large framebuffers....which isn't ESRAM size.
The 360 had this problem too for awhile, until developers started to ignore the Edram
A crap sounding song in lossless quality is still a crap sounding song. A good sounding song in 128kbps (highly compressed) is still a good sounding song.
A crap movie with terrible special effects in 4k resolution is still a crappy looking movie. A really great looking movie displayed in 480i is still a really great looking movie, despite the resolution disparity.
Why don't people apply the same logic to games?
Resolution means nothing in and of itself.
of course not
Ok thanks but with the whole MS Kinect NUad rumors from a bit back ago it seemed possible.
So, if Xbone launch titles were 480i, you would be good?A crap sounding song in lossless quality is still a crap sounding song. A good sounding song in 128kbps (highly compressed) is still a good sounding song.
A crap movie with terrible special effects in 4k resolution is still a crappy looking movie. A really great looking movie displayed in 480i is still a really great looking movie, despite the resolution disparity.
Why don't people apply the same logic to games?
Resolution means nothing in and of itself.
Kinect is also 1080p !!!. You can skype at full 1080p.
You can't upgrade a GPU through a firmware update.
A crap sounding song in lossless quality is still a crap sounding song. A good sounding song in 128kbps (highly compressed) is still a good sounding song.
A crap movie with terrible special effects in 4k resolution is still a crappy looking movie. A really great looking movie displayed in 480i is still a really great looking movie, despite the resolution disparity.
Why don't people apply the same logic to games?
Resolution means nothing in and of itself.
Was he lying or misrepresenting the obvious truth?