I'm confused about the Destiny Deal, did he deflect the question about Destiny 2 with Destiny. Or does Sony have some marketing for multiple games where the details were set in 2013.
Salt, PR etc.Does he not believe it's more powerful?
lol by this logic there is no reason for developers to optimize for pro over og ps4 either
what a dumb comment
lol by this logic there is no reason for developers to optimize for pro over og ps4 either
what a dumb comment
I'm confused about the Destiny Deal, did he deflect the question about Destiny 2 with Destiny. Or does Sony have some marketing for multiple games where the details were set in 2013.
lol by this logic there is no reason for developers to optimize for pro over og ps4 either
what a dumb comment
That's revisionist history if I ever saw it.What happened was that developers, maybe at the behest of publishers, developed up to the lowest common denominator and stopped there. And in very few cases took advantage of the additional horsepower of the PS3.
Mark Cerny
lol by this logic there is no reason for developers to optimize for pro over og ps4 either
what a dumb comment
Jim Ryan is Mattrick!
Why would anyone want to play that?
Why would anyone want to live there?
By his own logic, developers develop "up to the lowest common denominator and stopped there", so there would be no need for a Pro.
Now hang on, he's saying that no one is forcing them to use the extra power, not that the extra power isn't worthwhile. First- and third-party developers have been taking advantage of the extra power and that's great, but all he is saying is that most developers probably won't bother, which is true.
Ryan says a lot of shit but I don't really see the problem with this.
I'm confused about the Destiny Deal, did he deflect the question about Destiny 2 with Destiny. Or does Sony have some marketing for multiple games where the details were set in 2013.
Well they force devs to have a Pro mode so not really.
What happened was that developers, maybe at the behest of publishers, developed up to the lowest common denominator and stopped there. And in very few cases took advantage of the additional horsepower of the PS3.
Pro mode only mandates 1080p Res + same or greater performance than PS4 - http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/d...ion-4k-neo-and-the-original-ps4-will-co-existWell they force devs to have a Pro mode so not really.
So, why make the Pro in the first place? This guy is an idiot.
Do they? Didn't Prey release a Pro patch until a few weeks after release? I mean yes, in that instance they still have forced the developers...but I'm not so sure. And really, what do they mean by Pro support really? What thresholds do the developers have to meet to satisfy Sony's conditions?
So, why make the Pro in the first place? This guy is an idiot.
I agree with you. Look at the wide range of effort regarding Ps4 Pro enhancements. There are some that don't bother, some that are huge enhancements, but most somewhere inbetween.Now hang on, he's saying that no one is forcing them to use the extra power, not that the extra power isn't worthwhile. First- and third-party developers have been taking advantage of the extra power and that's great, but all he is saying is that most developers probably won't bother, which is true.
Ryan says a lot of shit but I don't really see the problem with this.
He is right on the money when it comes to the Blu-Ray drive though. Pretty much no cross-platform game ever made much use of the extra space.Right, it wasn't because the PS3 had such an exotic architecture making optimization costly and a pain... no it was those darn developers not sucking up to Sony.
What a load of bollocks.
Theres no denying it, but so far Ark.....running at 60fps 1080p isn't something to write home about.Does he not believe it's more powerful?
lol by this logic there is no reason for developers to optimize for pro over og ps4 either
what a dumb comment
He is right on the money when it comes to the Blu-Ray drive though. Pretty much no cross-platform game ever made much use of the extra space.
No, there is literally no statement in that interview that suggest what you are saying. Read it again.So now Sony execs are searching for a way to tell Playstation fans that PS4 Pro is superior.
It is so SAD.
People just enjoy the Fucking Games.
Besides this battle was started by SONY EXECS the day that Pro was unveiled (strongest current console bs).
In reality PS4 Pro never never NEVER had a single chance to defeat Xbox One X.
And 6 always be superior to 4.
Pro is business.
X IS ART.
That is actually mandated by Sony. The PS4 pro is not considered a separate console so game has to work on PS4 first.
And in the face of all the snarky comments here you would image there are like no games outside of first party that does not support the pro. Since we know that isn't true, are some posters still gonna show their stripes on this?
By his own logic, developers develop "up to the lowest common denominator and stopped there", so there would be no need for a Pro.
"Support" needs to be quantified. I don't own a Pro, so I haven't kept up with the per-game details.. but at launch, at lot of the "support" was simply faster loading right? And since then, the type of support varies from dev to dev and game to game. So, it would seem that it's at each Devs discretion, with some devs opting not to add any extra support at all.
So now Sony execs are searching for a way to tell Playstation fans that PS4 Pro is superior.