• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Killer is Dead 'can fuck off into space' - Matt Lees talks about "Gigolo mode"

Status
Not open for further replies.

RpgN

Junior Member
What kind of "people" am I?

And you still don't understand, so I hope people like you can understand what I try to say. Which has nothing to do with the ranting guy or the game.I don't give a crap what his believes or values are. I also don't care about Killer is Dead. I also don't care that he shits on Killer is Dead's optional mini game. It's all good imo. I never said he can't have his opinion on the mode or that it's wrong to voice it. It's the way he did it. "Fuck into space", wrong information, wearing wig in video Comparing Grasshopper to hentai developers etc. He finds the minigame ridiculous and disrespectful, yet acts childish himself and talk in a disrespectful way.

The people who might not have a problem with these kind of games and don't understand why other people might have problems. I thought you were one of those, if not, I'm sorry if I had that wrong.

If you're only having problems with the way he worded himself, that's up to you. In my opinion, even if he did sound strong and exaggerated with his words (which at certain parts he did yeah), I understood what he meant with his message and why he sounded like that.

Again, I have nothing to say about your point and I'm not going to argue against it.
 

PenKaizen

Banned
It's clearly a fucking piss take and social commentary.
A developer like Suda doesn't just put in a highly misogynistic game mechanic because he fucking loves misogynistic game mechanics. It's over the top for a reason, to highlight how fucking stupid a lot of game design is.

This is like how people think Dark Side Phil is being serious, you guys can be so fucking dumb sometimes, you're more interested in creating drama than you are about using your fucking brain.

Should... should... shouldddd the guy in the 5 thousand dollar suit have to explain Suda51 in 2013?

COME ON!
 

sonicmj1

Member
It's clearly a fucking piss take and social commentary.
A developer like Suda doesn't just put in a highly misogynistic game mechanic because he fucking loves misogynistic game mechanics. It's over the top for a reason, to highlight how fucking stupid a lot of game design is.

This is like how people think Dark Side Phil is being serious, you guys can be so fucking dumb sometimes, you're more interested in creating drama than you are about using your fucking brain.

Should... should... shouldddd the guy in the 5 thousand dollar suit have to explain Suda51 in 2013?

COME ON!

Is this like No More Heroes having a boring overworld because Travis Touchdown has an empty life?

Because that seemed like a stupid excuse at the time as well.
 

Amneisac

Member
Killer is Dead confirmed to be up there with RapeLay.

Right - okay, have to be careful with the word consenting when sex is involved. No, this isn't rape, she is 'consenting' to the sex. My point is that the NPC itself is being created with the sole purpose of being a sexual object. So, while the character is consenting, that character was created with the sole purpose of consenting to sex with the protagonist. I hope that clears it up.
 

PenKaizen

Banned
It's not an excuse, it's what Suda does, he does terrible things with game design because he finds it funny. He intentionally puts in this stuff because nobody else does and that's what makes it funny.

You're not making any academic feminist inroads by critiquing the most obvious OTT pisstake about.
 

LordJim

Member
Right - okay, have to be careful with the word consenting when sex is involved. No, this isn't rape, she is 'consenting' to the sex. My point is that the NPC itself is being created with the sole purpose of being a sexual object. So, while the character is consenting, that character was created with the sole purpose of consenting to sex with the protagonist. I hope that clears it up.

She can also reject you though.
 

wicko

Member
Suda 51, you really need to stop making games now, since you've offended a games journalist. You clearly share the same morality as your character Mondo. Never has any writer been able to shape a character that doesn't reflect it's creator. You obviously can't be trusted to create content that won't offend someone else.
 

Danny Dudekisser

I paid good money for this Dynex!
Right - okay, have to be careful with the word consenting when sex is involved. No, this isn't rape, she is 'consenting' to the sex. My point is that the NPC itself is being created with the sole purpose of being a sexual object. So, while the character is consenting, that character was created with the sole purpose of consenting to sex with the protagonist. I hope that clears it up.

So what? It's not saying anything about women at large. That's just what this character does.
 
I've realized that since the game is already being released as it is, there is no longer a need for me to attempt to defend my anticipation of what I feel will be an interesting and entertaining game. To those who are opposed to Gigolo mode, I understand and can sympathize with your concerns, and hope that your opinions and assertions are based on actual gameplay footage and/or personal gameplay experience. I also ask that you not insult or broadly generalize those who plan to play this game.
 

Kagami

Member
The word "gigolo" in Japanese has a slang meaning of "playboy" / "ladykiller" in addition to its meaning of a man who lives off women's money.
It's often associated with men who work at host clubs, which isn't prostitution per se--more like "get women to fall for you and buy you things."
A character who has a habit of innocently saying lines that make womens' hearts go pitter-pat without realizing he's doing it is referred to as a "natural gigolo" in Japanese.
It might have been better to rename it in the English version to avoid confusion, since the common usage in English these days seems to be just "male prostitute," but if getting upgrades or something from these characters as a result of romancing them is a notable part of it then maybe it works OK in English.
 
Oh okay, call the whole thing off, it is possible to make a mistake in the minigame game and not achieve the goal of sex with the female NPC. Totally validated now.

Not sure how it is really bad in the first place, it's maybe boring and pointless from a gameplay point of view.
But people have sex in the real world.

If rape or something aren't part of the deal.
 
I really don't give a rat's ass about this mode.

Frankly, I really don't see the point in Gigolo mode either, but the video is just pathetic. There are things such as BMX XXX and then there's Bayonetta and....this. How anyone can't see the difference between these two categories is way beyond me, but oh well...

(I couldn't even finish the video....lame attempt at being funny and critical.)
 
I play games to do things I can't do in real life.

In real life, I don't kill, I don't steal, I don't destroy places, I don't have any special pervy glasses, I don't have superpowers, I can't do many things really. Nor would I want to.

I don't play games that follow the rules of my reality. Otherwise what's the point? Games are an escape from reality. The same rules do not apply.

I'm gonna kill soldiers, I'm gonna take over countries, I'm gonna objectify women, I'm gonna objectify men. I'm gonna save the day, I'm gonna be a hero. I'm gonna do whatever I want. You know why? Because it's just a game. It's a guilt free thrill.

And let's be clear I don't buy games like this just for the perverted aspect. I buy games like this because I LOVE variety in my life and in my games. Simple.

I agree with the idea that playing games is a means of experiencing things you can't do in real life, but I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing to question the specific things we're doing. Obviously nobody gets hurt, but -- to use an extreme example -- just because nobody gets hurt when animated child pornography is created that doesn't mean it isn't reprehensible.
 

LordJim

Member
Oh okay, call the whole thing off, it is possible to make a mistake in the minigame game and not achieve the goal of sex with the female NPC. Totally validated now.

Any game with a romance sub story that is not forced by the plot can be considered a 'puzzle to be solved'.
'She cried about daddy issues and I had to make dialogue choices' apparently makes it all better.
 

remnant

Banned
Right - okay, have to be careful with the word consenting when sex is involved. No, this isn't rape, she is 'consenting' to the sex. My point is that the NPC itself is being created with the sole purpose of being a sexual object. So, while the character is consenting, that character was created with the sole purpose of consenting to sex with the protagonist. I hope that clears it up.
This "why was the NPC made. What was it purpose." argument is really dumb.

By your logic, all sex in games is rape.
 

Gold_Loot

Member
Right - okay, have to be careful with the word consenting when sex is involved. No, this isn't rape, she is 'consenting' to the sex. My point is that the NPC itself is being created with the sole purpose of being a sexual object. So, while the character is consenting, that character was created with the sole purpose of consenting to sex with the protagonist. I hope that clears it up.
So would it be OK with you if the NPCs were along with you throughout other sections of the game?
 

Amneisac

Member
So would it be OK with you if the NPCs were along with you throughout other sections of the game?

I have my own complaints about something like Mass Effect if that's what you're getting at, but at least they tried to create some kind of reasoning behind the sexual encounter. Whether they were successful or not is a separate debate.

So I couldn't really say if it would be okay or not until I saw it in practice.
 

Danny Dudekisser

I paid good money for this Dynex!
This "why was the NPC made. What was it purpose." argument is really dumb.

Seriously. I'm sure that outside of the bar, this girl has a very productive life where she earns as much as her male peers and has a lot of very important causes that she rallies behind, but right now, she's trying to get laid. Just leave her alone, for Chrissakes.
 

Truelize

Steroid Distributor
I'm not even angry about the blatant sexism, but more so that his games rely on stupid shock value and they still don't sell well. Terrible games with a false sense of style and outdated, boring gameplay. Mainly referring to Shadows of the Damned and Lollipop Chainsaw.



I don't have to play all of his works to criticize him.


Ah yeah you do. You can't sit on your elitest throne and say that "all of his games are terrible" and then admit that you haven't played all of his games.
That opinion of yours requires some prerequisites.

Hey everyone..... If you don't like Suda's games then how about you don't play them? Easy peasy lemon squeezy.
The guy is a mess and makes messed up games that I have found extremely enjoyable. Hope this game continues the trend.
 

Blueblur1

Member
"It's over, Suda51." Dude is funny. I've never cared for Suda's game but to say this dumb portion of Killer Is Dead should be the end of his career is ignorant. Yeah, it's dumb and it should be altered in some manner but its bit career ending. I wouldn't give this guy anymore attention.
 

Vice

Member
Well I wasn't even necessarily only talking about getting shitfaced drunk and screwing some stranger that same exact night that they met. I said alcohol increases the chances to sleep with someone, and it does but I really don't want to explain it further because I think I should have to
But anyways is simply offering a girl a drink automatically some offensive scary gesture that says " hey if you drink this you got to have sex with me tonight?". If so ,when did this officially happen?

I don't feel that buying a woman a drink is some offensive gesture. There are some who think its some huge terrible ordeal though.
 

Ouren

Member
Fuck yea Hatsuu.


Fuck no "fake gravely voice guy" making sweeping declarations. He's clearly the bearer of taste.

Motherfuck.
 

Zaventem

Member
"It's over, Suda51." Dude is funny. I've never cared for Suda's game but to say this dumb portion of Killer Is Dead should be the end of his career is ignorant. Yeah, it's dumb and it should be altered in some manner but its bit career ending. I wouldn't give this guy anymore attention.

These Western Journalist seem to think all people should be making is these "imsodeep" games. You even have a few in here talking about how gaming is growing up listing off shit like last of us like that means something. This "citizen kane of games" shit is getting increasing annoying and he's the type of person that's pushing it.
 

Persona86

Banned
I agree with the idea that playing games is a means of experiencing things you can't do in real life, but I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing to question the specific things we're doing. Obviously nobody gets hurt, but -- to use an extreme example -- just because nobody gets hurt when animated child pornography is created that doesn't mean it isn't reprehensible.

Agreed, but this video is not the right way about it. :)
 
Right - okay, have to be careful with the word consenting when sex is involved. No, this isn't rape, she is 'consenting' to the sex. My point is that the NPC itself is being created with the sole purpose of being a sexual object. So, while the character is consenting, that character was created with the sole purpose of consenting to sex with the protagonist. I hope that clears it up.
I still don't get your point. Are you trying to imply that every woman in creation surely leads a respectable, self-loving life aside from their sexuality?

You're trying to make it sound like the Gigolo mode women are the only portrayal of the female sex the game has, when that's clearly not true. He's at a bar trying to get laid, some chick is interested in getting laid, this isn't "lolvidyagames" this actually fucking happens in reality.

This white knighting holier than thou attitude is simply ridiculous. Specially in a game that is completely batshit insane borderline parody. Mondo talks to a fucking unicorn with hair and fights this naked dude that uses nothing but golden chains to cover his genitals for crying out loud.
 

Alienous

Member
iFlrzOEBCp8ME.gif
 

AHA-Lambda

Member
It's clearly a fucking piss take and social commentary.
A developer like Suda doesn't just put in a highly misogynistic game mechanic because he fucking loves misogynistic game mechanics. It's over the top for a reason, to highlight how fucking stupid a lot of game design is.

This is like how people think Dark Side Phil is being serious, you guys can be so fucking dumb sometimes, you're more interested in creating drama than you are about using your fucking brain.

Should... should... shouldddd the guy in the 5 thousand dollar suit have to explain Suda51 in 2013?

COME ON!

This reminds me of Yahtzee's take on the sexualisation of Bayonetta; it can be passed off as over the top and ironic but at the end of the day if people will still jack off to it, it's not really.
 

Amneisac

Member
Over-the-top doesn't make something a satire. You can't watch only the first hour of Blazing Saddles and call it a satire. You realize that part B of a satire is when you say, "yeah, what we are satirizing is ridiculous". In most games it is being glorified.
 

DYLANH24

Neo Member
You don't see how one person might have an issue with a game wherein you trick women to have sex with you by a) staring at their boobs without getting caught, b) staring at their boobs again, this time with X-ray glasses, and c) giving them gifts of money or liquor?

are you a wizard
 

Sorian

Banned
HEY GUYS, REMEMBER THAT BROS BEFORE HOES ACHIEVEMENT? LET'S WHINE ABOUT GAME DECISIONS THAT HAVE NO EFFECT ON US AT ALL!

Seriously, I doubt there is anything wrong here and most (if not all) in this thread haven't even seen what is up, first hand. I'll trust my own opinion when I play it over some jack off with a youtube channel. Thanks
 

Kuroyume

Banned
It feels like you're not allowed to like the physical features of women anymore. Fucking annoying. Women have made great strides in many places. Education, Busniess, Science, Arts, etc. What's wrong with allowing us to enjoy our carnal desires? It's like videogame journos are turning into the Taliban.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom