Make me wonder if Suda is a virgin lol
Looks at this fucking try hard. LELE AHAH HE'S A VIRGIN.
Make me wonder if Suda is a virgin lol
First of all, this game mode is not two consenting people on a date. That's the whole point. These female NPCs are created to have sex with.
.
They aren't consenting? So it's rape?
They aren't consenting? So it's rape?
What kind of "people" am I?
And you still don't understand, so I hope people like you can understand what I try to say. Which has nothing to do with the ranting guy or the game.I don't give a crap what his believes or values are. I also don't care about Killer is Dead. I also don't care that he shits on Killer is Dead's optional mini game. It's all good imo. I never said he can't have his opinion on the mode or that it's wrong to voice it. It's the way he did it. "Fuck into space", wrong information, wearing wig in video Comparing Grasshopper to hentai developers etc. He finds the minigame ridiculous and disrespectful, yet acts childish himself and talk in a disrespectful way.
They aren't consenting? So it's rape?
It's clearly a fucking piss take and social commentary.
A developer like Suda doesn't just put in a highly misogynistic game mechanic because he fucking loves misogynistic game mechanics. It's over the top for a reason, to highlight how fucking stupid a lot of game design is.
This is like how people think Dark Side Phil is being serious, you guys can be so fucking dumb sometimes, you're more interested in creating drama than you are about using your fucking brain.
Should... should... shouldddd the guy in the 5 thousand dollar suit have to explain Suda51 in 2013?
COME ON!
Killer is Dead confirmed to be up there with RapeLay.
Right - okay, have to be careful with the word consenting when sex is involved. No, this isn't rape, she is 'consenting' to the sex. My point is that the NPC itself is being created with the sole purpose of being a sexual object. So, while the character is consenting, that character was created with the sole purpose of consenting to sex with the protagonist. I hope that clears it up.
She can also reject you though.
Right - okay, have to be careful with the word consenting when sex is involved. No, this isn't rape, she is 'consenting' to the sex. My point is that the NPC itself is being created with the sole purpose of being a sexual object. So, while the character is consenting, that character was created with the sole purpose of consenting to sex with the protagonist. I hope that clears it up.
Oh okay, call the whole thing off, it is possible to make a mistake in the minigame game and not achieve the goal of sex with the female NPC. Totally validated now.
I play games to do things I can't do in real life.
In real life, I don't kill, I don't steal, I don't destroy places, I don't have any special pervy glasses, I don't have superpowers, I can't do many things really. Nor would I want to.
I don't play games that follow the rules of my reality. Otherwise what's the point? Games are an escape from reality. The same rules do not apply.
I'm gonna kill soldiers, I'm gonna take over countries, I'm gonna objectify women, I'm gonna objectify men. I'm gonna save the day, I'm gonna be a hero. I'm gonna do whatever I want. You know why? Because it's just a game. It's a guilt free thrill.
And let's be clear I don't buy games like this just for the perverted aspect. I buy games like this because I LOVE variety in my life and in my games. Simple.
Oh okay, call the whole thing off, it is possible to make a mistake in the minigame game and not achieve the goal of sex with the female NPC. Totally validated now.
This "why was the NPC made. What was it purpose." argument is really dumb.Right - okay, have to be careful with the word consenting when sex is involved. No, this isn't rape, she is 'consenting' to the sex. My point is that the NPC itself is being created with the sole purpose of being a sexual object. So, while the character is consenting, that character was created with the sole purpose of consenting to sex with the protagonist. I hope that clears it up.
So would it be OK with you if the NPCs were along with you throughout other sections of the game?Right - okay, have to be careful with the word consenting when sex is involved. No, this isn't rape, she is 'consenting' to the sex. My point is that the NPC itself is being created with the sole purpose of being a sexual object. So, while the character is consenting, that character was created with the sole purpose of consenting to sex with the protagonist. I hope that clears it up.
So would it be OK with you if the NPCs were along with you throughout other sections of the game?
This "why was the NPC made. What was it purpose." argument is really dumb.
I'm not even angry about the blatant sexism, but more so that his games rely on stupid shock value and they still don't sell well. Terrible games with a false sense of style and outdated, boring gameplay. Mainly referring to Shadows of the Damned and Lollipop Chainsaw.
I don't have to play all of his works to criticize him.
Well I wasn't even necessarily only talking about getting shitfaced drunk and screwing some stranger that same exact night that they met. I said alcohol increases the chances to sleep with someone, and it does but I really don't want to explain it further because I think I should have to
But anyways is simply offering a girl a drink automatically some offensive scary gesture that says " hey if you drink this you got to have sex with me tonight?". If so ,when did this officially happen?
pseudo feminist whining about video games is all the rageJesus Christ, this is still going on?
"It's over, Suda51." Dude is funny. I've never cared for Suda's game but to say this dumb portion of Killer Is Dead should be the end of his career is ignorant. Yeah, it's dumb and it should be altered in some manner but its bit career ending. I wouldn't give this guy anymore attention.
They aren't consenting? So it's rape?
I agree with the idea that playing games is a means of experiencing things you can't do in real life, but I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing to question the specific things we're doing. Obviously nobody gets hurt, but -- to use an extreme example -- just because nobody gets hurt when animated child pornography is created that doesn't mean it isn't reprehensible.
I still don't get your point. Are you trying to imply that every woman in creation surely leads a respectable, self-loving life aside from their sexuality?Right - okay, have to be careful with the word consenting when sex is involved. No, this isn't rape, she is 'consenting' to the sex. My point is that the NPC itself is being created with the sole purpose of being a sexual object. So, while the character is consenting, that character was created with the sole purpose of consenting to sex with the protagonist. I hope that clears it up.
Is the goal to have sex or receive gifts? If it's gifts then we are basically playing a male prostitute.
It's clearly a fucking piss take and social commentary.
A developer like Suda doesn't just put in a highly misogynistic game mechanic because he fucking loves misogynistic game mechanics. It's over the top for a reason, to highlight how fucking stupid a lot of game design is.
This is like how people think Dark Side Phil is being serious, you guys can be so fucking dumb sometimes, you're more interested in creating drama than you are about using your fucking brain.
Should... should... shouldddd the guy in the 5 thousand dollar suit have to explain Suda51 in 2013?
COME ON!
That speaks poorly of them, not Suda.This reminds me of Yahtzee's take on the sexualisation of Bayonetta; it can be passed off as over the top and ironic but at the end of the day if people will still jack off to it, it's not really.
Did GAF just create a new in-joke? I actually like this one.I was looking forward to playing Killer Is Dead. Now Mondo is stuck in space
Thanks Matt Lees
You don't see how one person might have an issue with a game wherein you trick women to have sex with you by a) staring at their boobs without getting caught, b) staring at their boobs again, this time with X-ray glasses, and c) giving them gifts of money or liquor?
I was looking forward to playing Killer Is Dead. Now Mondo is stuck in space
Thanks Matt Lees
This reminds me of Yahtzee's take on the sexualisation of Bayonetta; it can be passed off as over the top and ironic but at the end of the day if people will still jack off to it, it's not really.
People will jack off to anything though.
It's like videogame journos are turning into the Taliban.