It was a point he was trying to make. The game was hack and here is just one reason why it could be. As you have pointed out, that mode was a silly mode, not only to add it to a game, but to advertise and base your whole image of your game on it. That was his point. It deterred from the fact , it was shitty game. Also, as you have pointed it out, the game is not good to begin with, that he knows from people he trusts their opinion, hence, he doesn't need to know if the game is shitty. Yes, he can say whatever e wants about the game which he knows a great deal about, more than any of us could say, because guess what, we didn't play at the time and yes, his opinion holds weight until we see it for ourself tat its a shitty game.
Matt is hack? it sounds you have a personal grudge against a man, not only from his point of view of this game. and trying to pin it down to his ''predictable'' criticism to a shitty game is not a strong evidence to label him as such.
I don't know what points you're talking about, but I've only been referencing "Killer is Dead: Just Like Suda 51's Career" and the comments he made to defend himself in the thread that got locked, in response to Lees' comment on the reviews that was posted in this thread. I'd rather not keep harping about it at all, because the mods locked that thread for a reason and I don't want it to spill over into this thread, but you keep saying that Lees had more than one point and that his Twitter response was a valid comment on one of those points, and for the life of me I don't know why; I'm only bringing it up this last time in order to get some common ground.
Lee's entire point in his video, and the write-up that accompanied it, was that Killer is Dead is indicative of a trend of juvenile, sleazy humor in Suda's games, and that this time he's overstepped his bounds. And to argue that point, he harped on one thing: tone and context. He said that himself, in his own video, and went out of his way to stress it at the very start. He goes to great efforts to stress that he's boggled at the idea that anyone over at Grasshopper Manufacture would think that Gigolo Mode was acceptable, let alone greenlight it for production. He willingly points out that Suda does good work, or at least interesting work; but he also feels that this is the tipping point of Grasshopper Manufacture's work, that this is a line that was crossed too clumsily, a joke too exploitative for Suda and co. to continue to enjoy the respect and the benefit of the doubt anymore. I'm actually dead sure on it now, because I had to go back and watch it just to double check (and I feel like I wasted another 4 minutes of my life doing so).
Matt Lees did not say anything about the quality of Gigolo mode, or the game in general - he looked at Gigolo Mode in a vaccuum, and the context and the tone of the mini-game was the only thing he discussed in said video. His co-worker, Steven Burns, was more than happy to touch on both of those points in the write-up that accompanied Lees' video, but Lees himself had nothing to say about whether or not the mini-game dragged down the overall game at the start of the discussion on that video. And he definitely didn't mention anything about it being used to advertise the game in the video. He simply said that it could and should be a tipping point in Suda's career.
And when he decided to comment on the response to the video, he went on this weird kick about respectability politics in his posts - the sort of bravado and stubbornness that would have been admirable if his point weren't so obnoxious. He brushed off accusations of alarmism, insisted that
all of his points were valid and kept going on about how his video was just one of many instances of him championing social causes, and how it's nuts that so many people reacted to that one video, and all sorts of other stuff. He gave me the impression that while his initial video was condemning the tone and context of Gigolo Mode, all of his responses And again, he didn't make any mention of the quality of the game.
I still remember how he kept using that "I'm proud to wear that badge" line. God that was obnoxious.
So now he's decided to chime in on the general reception of KiD - "Killer is Dead *is* a piece of shit", as if he called it and no one would listen to him - and he makes that little jab about wondering if the internet owe him an apology, and I have to ask "for what?" People didn't jump all over him because he said that the game was shit - he didn't even imply that, so why would they hold that against him in the first place? They got on his case because his video was sloppy, and when he doubled-down on his comments - on Youtube, on Twitter, on GAF, with other developers as the story spread - instead of acknowledging them, everyone else who thought he made mistakes doubled-down on their criticisms of his behavior.
But now, all of a sudden, the game being shit matters to him. Now it's worth placing Gigolo Mode in the broader context of the game, because now he can pat himself on the back and say that his critics jumped the gun on their responses, while completely missing the point of the entire dust-up in the process. And I saw a trend of other posters posting that yeah, he totally called it. It seemed silly, and a bit strange. So I made my post about your post, one thing lead to another, and here we are.
I don't know why the game being shitty is such a cut-up to him, or why you feel Lees had the tact to broach that angle before, but I don't think that it would have justified his general responses to his critics if he had. There's nothing for him to feel validated about, because the main thrust of his argument is still valid, and would be valid even if Killer is Dead was a triumph - and his responses would have still been shitty, too.
I'll say this, though. Whether it was valid or not, I shouldn't have put you on the spot like that. I wanted to see what it was like to throw someone else under the bus just to make a point; turns out it's not really worth it. I don't know what other posters get out of it, but I should have just addressed you directly instead of using your post as a punchline. It was in poor taste, and I'm sorry about that.