Support NeoGAF

[Hunter S.]

Well, I was hoping fro a graphics update. Will just play my 360 version every once in awhile as I have been doing.

 

[travisbickle]

Well, I was hoping fro a graphics update. Will just play my 360 version every once in awhile as I have been doing.

Have the developers released graphical updates for the PC version? Or has that been done by the modding community?

 

[Eknots]

I had no clue minecraft on consoles was a thing, no mods/textures and I'm guessing limitations on the world. Who could stand that considering it runs on basically any normal pc, amazes me.

 

[Hunter S.]

Have the developers released graphical updates for the PC version? Or has that been done by the modding community?

I am guessing a modding community. A man can still dream.

 

[$h@d0w]

Is the Vita version same as the console ones?

 

[EdReedFan20]

I can play Spelunky in cross-play with both my PS3 and Vita logged in the same account. There shouldn't be a problem.

That's really cool. If it is triple-cross buy (PS Vita, PS3, PS4) that would be really fun for LAN. One purchase, three players with their own screens. Or split-screen on PS4 (4 players), split-screen of PS3 (4-more players) and one on Vita. That would allow for 9 players with one purchase! Maybe the PS Vita can also be used as an secondary screen for inventory, for those that want it.

 

[mrklaw]

So, Vita and PS4 crossplay?

The amount of memory on vita would suggest it is more in line with 360 (is there a PS3 version?), so if PS4 has larger worlds, it might not be possible to do cross play. Would be a shame, I'd love to play on vita while the kids share splitscreen

 

[EdReedFan20]

The amount of memory on vita would suggest it is more in line with 360 (is there a PS3 version?), so if PS4 has larger worlds, it might not be possible to do cross play. Would be a shame, I'd love to play on vita while the kids share splitscreen

Yes, there's a PS3 version.

 

[Piggus]

The idea of Minecraft on consoles without mod support or HD textures amuses me.

The world size of the console version is even more amusing. It just totally ruins the game imo.

I had no clue minecraft on consoles was a thing, no mods/textures and I'm guessing limitations on the world. Who could stand that considering it runs on basically any normal pc, amazes me.

I don't get it either. It's not demanding on PC at all.

 

[BigDug13]

The amount of memory on vita would suggest it is more in line with 360 (is there a PS3 version?), so if PS4 has larger worlds, it might not be possible to do cross play. Would be a shame, I'd love to play on vita while the kids share splitscreen

They could maybe allow both. Such as a world started on Vita and the PS4 opens that same world file up and it stays at that smaller total size to be playable across both.

 

[simplythebest]

Why is everyone feeling down about there being balance across all platforms?

 

[BigDug13]

The world size of the console version is even more amusing. It just totally ruins the game imo.



I don't get it either. It's not demanding on PC at all.

Try running it on a PC with 512MB RAM. That's what the 360 version of Minecraft is.

It's not graphically taxing, but I bet it's a memory hog to maintain the world state.

It would be disappointing if the Ps4 and XBO version ends up with similarly small worlds. Even the Vita has 256MB more RAM than either PS3 or 360.