This CG business got me thinking, and after some more analysis I've discovered a few unsettling things. Let me share my research.
Consider this photo:
Look at the eyes, man. Look at the eyes. They're dim, devoid of personality or life. There is no shred of human emotion evident in the cold, inorganic gaze. That is the first clue.
A few other things - the bag of Doritos is too puffed out for the typical contents of such a product. When you buy these from the store, half the bag is air, and the bag itself is usually crumpled and filthy from being used as a football by a pair of minimum wage shitsticks in the warehouse.
If you look closely at the Mountain Dew, you notice the top is unnaturally clean. In reality, an unopened bottle of Dew like that would have a tacky residue over the top, comprised of leakage from broken bottles and rat piss from storage.
I think it's safe to ask some questions - is this scene - and "Geoff Keighly" himself- CG?
Now, consider this image:
There's a number of problems here. For one thing, it's subtle, but the face seems too unnaturally polygonal around the chin. This got me thinking, and I began to look at Gies' output on Twitter. After some textual and linguistical analysis, I came to the conclusion that most of "Gies" messages were devoid of factual content or meaning. In fact, I could almost entirely generating a "Gies-like" twitter output by training a chatbot's dictionary with Google Zeitgeist terms and Microsoft press releases.
How deep does this go?
#TeamCG
