JetBlackPanda
Member
MGSV: Ground Zeroes?
Not sure that counts, everyone should have known exactly what that game was. I actually played a good 15-20 hours of Ground Zeroes.
MGSV: Ground Zeroes?
you could ask him in the interview to say what he said in the morning - that way you can tell us
Second no frills play through, hard difficulty camera bias on aim assist off. My first play through as I stated I spent the vast majority of it just looking at things and trying to see what I could and could not do.
Second play through time is just over 8 hours which includes an unspecified amount of time where I had to put my kids to bed and argue with my wife about hogging up the big TV during the walking dead.
I can't imagine there would be many GAFers out there who would intentionally completely ignore every single collectible, viewable or readable item within the game, even if the button prompt came up right in-front of them. Like wise with not looking around or exploring even a little bit.
Not sure that counts, everyone should have known exactly what that game was. I actually played a good 15-20 hours of Ground Zeroes.
Some of my personal favorite games of all time are shorter ones. I have a hard time completing super long games. I am one who prefers something engaging and on the shorter end.
Heavenly sword, TLOU etc etc
Great, impactful stories that didn't take a ton of time to complete.
This way, I can play through them a couple of times for trophies and whatnot.
This is still a day one for me.
There were people concerned over MGR due to its short length. I beat the game in 5 hours but man were those the best 5 hours of that day. Yeah, it was short but I didn't had any regret spending $60 on it.It seems to me that through the history of this forum we always have a lot of concerned posts over total playtime concerning every game that comes out. For all the deep concerns though have we ever actually had a game come out that was deemed a terrible value based on length? I can't think of one game I have played and thought - WTF! Thats it!! Only BLANK hours!!!
I can't tell for sure, but they did wander around a bit at times, so my guess is that it was their first time. Also, they unlocked trophies while playing, so that would suggest it was their first time. They didn't seem to be looking for hidden stuff or anything, they just went straight for the main objective. I wouldn't call it a speed run or anything though.
There were people concerned over MGR due to its short length. I beat the game in 5 hours but man were those the best 5 hours of that day. Yeah, it was short but I didn't had any regret spending $60 on it.
Some of my personal favorite games of all time are shorter ones. I have a hard time completing super long games. I am one who prefers something engaging and on the shorter end.
Heavenly sword, TLOU etc etc
Great, impactful stories that didn't take a ton of time to complete.
This way, I can play through them a couple of times for trophies and whatnot.
This is still a day one for me.
Second no frills play through, hard difficulty camera bias on aim assist off. My first play through as I stated I spent the vast majority of it just looking at things and trying to see what I could and could not do.
Second play through time is just over 8 hours which includes an unspecified amount of time where I had to put my kids to bed and argue with my wife about hogging up the big TV during the walking dead.
I'm a pathetic excuse of a Gaffer!
I play a lot of games on easy.
Lol me too. I'm like fuck this annoying fight here eat some of my easy mode bullets and let me progress and know what happens next
I'm a gaffer and I don't collect shit . Eg uc games or tlou's pendants in like oh cool 50 more left I don't care . I do read up on story related collectible at times tho depends on the strength of the story
I do soak up the atmosphere and graphics at times but it has to be something awesome eg riverside after pittsburg. Some amazing skyboxes etc.
Just assuming everyone wants to play things a certain segment do it not being true to the general populace (even actual gaf populace)
And this is coming from someone who doesn't really have that many qualms if the game is roughly 5.5 6 hours if that long is good enough I'll enjoy it . However I am ready to realize that's what my playtime would be like because I play like that YouTube person .
Not sure that counts, everyone should have known exactly what that game was. I actually played a good 15-20 hours of Ground Zeroes.
I sadly only played once. Would love a remaster of it.To be fair it is expected to play multiple times on multiple difficulty settings in a game like MGR plus you have plenty of unlocking to do.
Uh... TLOU is pretty long for a shooter. It took me 34 hours to finish - I was looking in every dark corner of the map and stealthing every possible encounter (stealthing = stealthi killing every enemy inlcuding Clickers).
Not sure TLOU is a good example considering its 15-20 hours long.
Second no frills play through, hard difficulty camera bias on aim assist off. My first play through as I stated I spent the vast majority of it just looking at things and trying to see what I could and could not do.
Second play through time is just over 8 hours which includes an unspecified amount of time where I had to put my kids to bed and argue with my wife about hogging up the big TV during the walking dead.
Did you not see the smash threads? There were like 10 or more before release.I dont remember ever being so many threads with 30+ pages, about a game that hasnt come off yet...if we could merge them all together we'd be getting close to 500 pages by now.
Not saying ignore them if there right in front of you but the majority of people won't be bothered looking for these tidbits and gaffers are the minority in the gaming world not the majority.
I've started to think a lot of the heat this game is getting on here is because a lot of people had incredibly high hopes for the game and the hype was driven up dramatically by two pseudo insiders on here whom were fed drips on inside information and promised that The Order would be a genre defining game.
Once the wool came off everyone's eyes, it's was people thought it was from the first previews.
I've started to think a lot of the heat this game is getting on here is because a lot of people had incredibly high hopes for the game and the hype was driven up dramatically by two pseudo insiders on here whom were fed drips on inside information and promised that The Order would be a genre defining game.
Once the wool came off everyone's eyes, it's was people thought it was from the first previews.
I've started to think a lot of the heat this game is getting on here is because a lot of people had incredibly high hopes for the game and the hype was driven up dramatically by two pseudo insiders on here whom were fed drips on inside information and promised that The Order would be a genre defining game.
Once the wool came off everyone's eyes, it's was people thought it was from the first previews.
I dont remember ever being so many threads with 30+ pages, about a game that hasnt come off yet...if we could merge them all together we'd be getting close to 500 pages by now.
I've started to think a lot of the heat this game is getting on here is because a lot of people had incredibly high hopes for the game and the hype was driven up dramatically by two pseudo insiders on here whom were fed drips on inside information and promised that The Order would be a genre defining game.
Once the wool came off everyone's eyes, it's was people thought it was from the first previews.
Well isn't this the point? Knowing what it is, being concerned about it, and still ending up disappointed? I think I've seen threads about Ground Zeroes being too short after it came out... could be wrong though.
You sure spend a lot of time stressing it is less than 6 hours in multiple The Order thread, I wonder why.....
You talk like you know the YouTuber and you even ignore that one GAF member (who is trophy hunter and failry good player) gave his playtime on normal as more than 10 hours.
And you sure do love bashing it as well
Please. Just stop with this BS in this thread, like you have been doing in every The Order thread.
If TLOU was a shooter I may have actually enjoyed it. Uncharted with zombies it was not.Uh... TLOU is pretty long for a shooter. It took me 34 hours to finish - I was looking in every dark corner of the map and stealthing every possible encounter (stealthing = stealthi killing every enemy inlcuding Clickers).
MGSV: Ground Zeroes?
This never happened.
Yup. That's exactly what I was thinking of the game. I don't like to do "dev charity" but I really want to see what they can do with a sequel now that the engine is built. Can they pull an Uncharted and come back with a way better sequel and some solid multiplayer? I hope so. So I think I'm still buying it.I'm watching the first chapter on youtube, since I won't be getting the game now and I just want to get a sense for the IP.
RaD is smart. They positioned themselves to do really well this gen. Now they have a solid engine built for the PS4, they are releasing a story focused game with iconic visuals to establish a possible franchise. The game also appears to have solid mechanics that could serve as the basis for co-op and multiplayer modded, making a sequel even more compelling.
Every successful console ends up spawning a few successful franchises, this has everything to be one.
This never happened.
To be fair, I really think Shinobi should not post these hype tidbits like "wait and see "
etc... in threads. He did this especially regarding the "soft body physics" stuff, which we have yet to really see.
He is the main one I'm referencing.
So is the story good?
I ask cause I saw in the other thread, that Rapier seems to (at least if I unerstand) that the story is bad, and has a lot of issues. Which seems to be going against his saying about the story in this thread.
This is not really what happened at all lol. The game has been getting more heat than most games in recent memory, from the very offset. Including some pretty lukewarm early previews (though several of the newer one's were more positive). Someone pull out that Order 1886 chalk board lol.
EDIT: Found it lol. I still think it's missing loads of things.
I don't remember him saying anything about physics. I only remember Pessino saying things about it on Twitter.To be fair, I really think Shinobi should not post these hype tidbits like "wait and see "
etc... in threads. He did this especially regarding the "soft body physics" stuff, which we have yet to really see.
Ok, just finished the game. I suck at writing impressions so I'll keep it short.
I didn't find the story anything special. But it's good enough, good characters with top notch VA and great facial animations.
Gameplay wise, it's solid. Satisfying gunplay, great weapons, decent AI. My main issue with the mechanics is that when you're close to a cover, Galahad would automatically stick to it, and that really irritated me. There's a button for taking cover if I wanted to, so why is there a contextual system on top of that? And there's no way to turn this off.
The disappointing: The unique weapons are so underutilized. The half breed encounters, both number and design wise.. What a missed opportunity.
Overall I liked it, I was craving for an AAA TPS and this game delivered, with an amazing atmosphere and solid gameplay. But just as I expected, it was honestly nothing special. 7/10 (If you wanna know my scale:).1-5=different levels of crap, 6=decent, 7=good, 8=great, 9=amazing, 10=The GOAT and it's reserved for TLG
Now, where's my photo mode...
Ok, just finished the game. I suck at writing impressions so I'll keep it short.
I've started to think a lot of the heat this game is getting on here is because a lot of people had incredibly high hopes for the game and the hype was driven up dramatically by two pseudo insiders on here whom were fed drips on inside information and promised that The Order would be a genre defining game.
Once the wool came off everyone's eyes, it's was people thought it was from the first previews.