Makes you wonder if these items were DLC in the first place.
Technically, it is downloadable content, though.
I was one of 'those' who bought the Oblivion horsey armor. Am I even worthy of such a gift?
You know what I meant.
Shall we call Diablo III's UEE patch 2.0 update, DLC as well because because it happens to add "content" to the game that you need to "download"
CDPR are great devs with their DRM-free games and their online game store GoG which promotes this as well, but lets not act like CDPR isn't trying to make some kind PR statement and jab other developers at the same time with this thing.
I'd rather they take the high road and do what have done in the past and added the content and improvements much like they did with the updates to The Witcher 1 and 2, which wasn't any different as it added content to the game without charging a price to the players, and of course without the thinly veiled PR mudslinging to other devs who charge a price for content after a games release.
CD Projekt Red is better than this.
"Thinly veiled" implies it was intended to be veiled at all. I think most people see exactly what they are doing - poking fun at lame industry trends.
tsk tsk
You should know by now that once the core game is finalized done, the art teams keep working. DLC is composed of previously cut content, or new content hadn't been thought up for the final cut.
Sounds like some free little tidbits, but nothing substantial.
Cool, I guess.
"Thinly veiled" implies it was intended to be veiled at all. I think most people see exactly what they are doing - poking fun at lame industry trends.
Then why aren't they just part of the game?
In a way, that's better. It means there's nothing substantial being cut from the game for resale as DLC. We're getting a complete product as-is.
Most DLC isn't cut content, despite what people love to believe. There might be stuff that is planned or even in production stages at time of release, but in the large majority of cases, the DLC you see is not stuff that was completed and then just left out.In a way, that's better. It means there's nothing substantial being cut from the game for resale as DLC. We're getting a complete product as-is.
So, like a patch?
Keep people interested and active in the game and build positive brand loyalty.
See? Look at all this positive brand loyalty that is being built.
You know what I meant.
Shall we call Diablo III's UEE patch 2.0 update, DLC as well because because it happens to add "content" to the game that you need to "download"
CDPR are great devs with their DRM-free games and their online game store GoG which promotes this as well, but lets not act like CDPR isn't trying to make some kind PR statement and jab other developers at the same time with this thing.
I'd rather they take the high road and do what have done in the past and added the content and improvements much like they did with the updates to The Witcher 1 and 2, which wasn't any different as it added content to the game without charging a price to the players, and of course without the thinly veiled PR mudslinging to other devs who charge a price for content after a games release.
CD Projekt Red is better than this.
So they're just content patches right?
I guess calling it free DLC gives them better publicity.
Either way this definitely a good thing.
Makes you wonder if these items were DLC in the first place.
Why do people question CDPR here? This is DLC.
What is DLC? Down Loadable Content.
Is CDPR allowing you to download new content after the game releases? Yes.
In the definition of DLC, does it strictly state all DLC requires some sort of payment? No.
So CDPR is allowing it's customers to download content after the release of the game for no extra cost. Looks fine to me.
how does this studio make any money