no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
Boom.
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
I notice that an unsubstantiated Gaf rumor (with as many "insiders" denying it as confirming it), followed by a formal retort from a Microsoft representative who would see a backlash if he openly lied about something, still has people insisting that its true. Not because of any evidence, but because it simply must be true.
He could have ignored it, or given the usual 'we do not comment on rumors and speculation' or some other vague comment. Instead he actually gave a clear answer for once.
Has crazy buttocks been wrong about anything in the past?
Pretty sure he can click on the thread and see what it is.
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
But GPU downclock doesn't, correct?
Maybe that's what Larry's talking about.
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
That's a logical fallacy for one and secondly they admitted to the problems of RROD and paid for them.
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
A few months ago, a Microsoft employee who told the truth about their online DRM was fired for it. Food for thought.
why do yuu tipe like...thi.s?no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
There's enough leeway in MJ's response for that to be true.But GPU downclock doesn't, correct?
Maybe that's what Larry's talking about.
Wow this is pathetic... you just want it to be true even if they come out and say it's false?
That's a logical fallacy for one and secondly they admitted to the problems of RROD and paid for them.
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
That would make it look worst if he said that , MS does not want any sort of rumor of another RROD .
Saying we don't comment on something mean it can either be true or false why would MS want anybody to think that .
Plus saying no comment could make things worst .
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
The only time I remember is most likely explained by what he was talking about changing before it was made public.Has crazy buttocks been wrong about anything in the past?
Definitely taking Cboats word over PR.
And we are done here with Nelson PR bullshit.
I notice that an unsubstantiated Gaf rumor (with as many "insiders" denying it as confirming it), followed by a formal retort from a Microsoft representative who would see a backlash if he openly lied about something, still has people insisting that its true. Not because of any evidence, but because it simply must be true.
Interesting.
And to reiterate: If they don't respond to a rumor, it's obviously true, even if we have inconsistent information on our end. And if they respond with a clear denial, it must still be true, because "this company would never make an accurate statement." There's something in the air right now, and I don't like the smell of it.
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
OK, but he could still just have ignored it and not answered at all. People are asking him constantly questions on twitter that he never replies to.
So why didn't he just ignore the question, or post "we do not comment on rumors"? Instead, Microsoft officially declared that the ESRAM was not a problem/issue. It is possible Major Nelson was commenting to the "down-clocking" rumors...in which case, we have an answer. I could give two shits if there are "yield" issues.
He responded to the tweet in two minutes.
no.
pr=$$$ to shil for corps
me=notpaifd fpor anyting 9 ysrs here on gaf, all free and all myo love. gamers and games, noohther.
esram stands, perio.d.
truthfact.
To be fair, Larry might not even be aware of the technical issues, he's a PR guy, it's not something he is going to know first hand and if he asks someone higher up about it what do you think they'd tell him to say on twitter?
I don't have a specific link but I am pretty sure MS spent a good long time claiming that xbox 360 failure rates were within the norm for electronic products.
why do yuu tipe like...thi.s?
MS didn't publicly openly lie to everyone that viewed their Reveal? All executives nonetheless.I notice that an unsubstantiated Gaf rumor (with as many "insiders" denying it as confirming it), followed by a formal retort from a Microsoft representative who would see a backlash if he openly lied about something, still has people insisting that its true. Not because of any evidence, but because it simply must be true.
Interesting.
And to reiterate: If they don't respond to a rumor, it's obviously true, even if we have inconsistent information on our end. And if they respond with a clear denial, it must still be true, because "this company would never make an accurate statement." There's something in the air right now, and I don't like the smell of it.
I think I'll believe cboat over a corporate mouthpiece that figures we'll never know the real story anyway.
He didn't even outright say the truth at all. He just implied it. There's no way Major Nelson would be outright say "yeah our shit is so fucked up" or anything implying it. Paid shill and all that.A few months ago, a Microsoft employee who told the truth about their online DRM was fired for it. Food for thought.
I notice that an unsubstantiated Gaf rumor (with as many "insiders" denying it as confirming it), followed by a formal retort from a Microsoft representative who would see a backlash if he openly lied about something, still has people insisting that its true. Not because of any evidence, but because it simply must be true.
Interesting.
And to reiterate: If they don't respond to a rumor, it's obviously true, even if we have inconsistent information on our end. And if they respond with a clear denial, it must still be true, because "this company would never make an accurate statement." There's something in the air right now, and I don't like the smell of it.
A few months ago, a Microsoft employee who told the truth about their online DRM was fired for it. Food for thought.
So why didn't he just ignore the question, or post "we do not comment on rumors"? Instead, Microsoft officially declared that the ESRAM was not a problem/issue. It is possible Major Nelson was commenting to the "down-clocking" rumors...in which case, we have an answer. I could give two shits if there are "yield" issues.
So why didn't he just ignore the question, or post "we do not comment on rumors"? Instead, Microsoft officially declared that the ESRAM was not a problem/issue. It is possible Major Nelson was commenting to the "down-clocking" rumors...in which case, we have an answer. I could give two shits if there are "yield" issues.
cboat only leaks MS stuff, we a Sony version of him, like "insane testicles on a bike" or something.