Chuck Norris
Banned
Just do a separate story based co-op like Valve did with Portal 2
It would be awesome if they did this. A mini-adventure with Drake and Sully or something would be excellent.Chuck Norris said:Just do a separate story based co-op like Valve did with Portal 2
Irish said:I don't understand one fucking bit why people are so against co-op. Not one fucking bit.
Have you guys forgotten everything you played before Resident Evil 5? Does anybody here remember how co-op used to be done? Anyone?
Here's what you do:
You drop some random fucking nobody right alongside Drake and then you never acknowledge him once. Not once. This person doesn't even get a name. That person will never appear in the cutscenes either. All that person does is shoot shit up and platform along with ND. You also double the enemy count.
It was the go-to method for years, why are we all against it now?
Hell, it's one of the big reasons I've played R:FoM more than Resistance 2.
Now, I know Uncharted has some of those set-piece moments that seem like they could only work with a single person, but those can easily be shown using a very simple method. First person there activates the section and, if necessary, the other player warps in right alongside him. If it is a cutscene, the random automatically disappears and the two people get to enjoy the cutscene together as it was in SP.
Besides, people will play the SP first anyway, so a little bit of jankiness in co-op means little.
In addition to that, you can also bring back the small U2-style Co-Op sections.
I agree with you. I think the only reason that they're not going too much into details on the single player is because they want to keep the set pieces under wraps so people are blown away at launch. They've proven they can do a good job with single player and multiplayer with Uncharted 2 so they're showing off the new MP features since most people can be confident in the quality of the single player.Trick_GSF said:Ugh.
I'd rather they didn't go down the co-op route. I'm not a fan of online gaming. If you are, great news, but for people who just like to sit and play at their own pace it's frustrating because normally the single player experience is compromised. (Resident Evil 5 is a good example).
If Naughty Dog can pull it off without sacrificing the the single player experience, well good. I hope the multiplayer fans enjoy it, but other then that, do not want.
Not to sound fanboy-ish/whiny, but all this talk of online gaming in Uncharted is getting on my tits. I don't care about any of that and never did. I care about Elena, Sully and Nate. So give me some damn story info, ND. I though the single player experience is what Uncharted was all about.
It... just makes me nervous for some reason. I have faith in Naughty Dog.
They can't, because KZ3 MP framerate and maps SUCK, and ND's maps and framerate don't.MuseManMike said:People are concerned that they are going to RE5 this shit? The bigger concern is if they KZ3 the multiplayer.
mufraka said:They can't, because KZ3 MP framerate and maps SUCK, and ND's maps and framerate don't.
Callibretto said:easy way to do it is to make co-op sp campaign as an unlockable after you beat the game once. and since Uncharted is divided into chapters, just make co-op available on chapters where Drake is with npc shooting bad guys, letting 2nd player control whoever is with Drake at the moment. or just don't care about continuity or whatever and just let a 2nd Drake appear and disappear during shootout or set pieces. we already play the single player alone and experience it the way it's meant to be played. now they can go crazy with the 2nd or 3rd playthrough. no difference with how we can change skin in previous games.
H_Prestige said:KZ2's maps and framerate don't suck either.
Is the same MP team from UC2 working on UC3?
Everyone has to realize that nothing is sacred post-MW2. I have confidence the gunplay and the maps will be solid. It's the all the new stuff that scares me (medal kickbacks).MalboroRed said:Same fucking team, same fucking MP director (well he's game director now).
Can't you only use a medal kickback once per game?MuseManMike said:Everyone has to realize that nothing is sacred post-MW2. I have confidence the gunplay and the maps will be solid. It's the all the new stuff that scares me (medal kickbacks).
MalboroRed said:Same fucking team, same fucking MP director (well he's game director now).
I think? We won't know for sure until the beta. But even if it's only once, it'll still be an issue.RoboPlato said:Can't you only use a medal kickback once per game?
This needs to happen because there are people who don't even pick up the pluder or go for the objectives.alr1ghtstart said:Zero leaderboards
No KDR in Objective games
jett said:Does anyone know if the beta will be open to EVERYONE, or will only a few receive invites?
jett said:Does anyone know if the beta will be open to EVERYONE, or will only a few receive invites?
Leshita said:Why can't they just have a weekly list, monthly, and all-time?
It can't be that hard to implement.
ZeroRay said:If I remember right, it opens a week early in late June for PSN Plus/Infamous 2 buyers then everyone else can play.
Cyberia said:June 28 for PlayStation Plus members/inFamous 2 buyers, July 5th open to ALL.
Doesn't mean you shouldn't buy inFamous 2 dude.jett said:Sweetness.
Cyberia said:June 28 for PlayStation Plus members/inFamous 2 buyers, July 5th open to ALL.
Chuck Norris said:Just do a separate story based co-op like Valve did with Portal 2
Darkatomz said:Doesn't mean you shouldn't buy inFamous 2 dude.
Does she really want to admit this? Haha! Kidding!Amy Hennig said:you can write any piece of crap and theyll make it sound wonderful. Trust me, Ive done it!
alr1ghtstart said:Zero leaderboards
No KDR in Objective games
alr1ghtstart said:UC3 was showing up as on GTTV tonight (tomorrow morning) for weeks on the program info, but has since changed to a generic E3 show. So, it's likely we'll see something tonight.