This is all that needs to be said really, especially when Spencer's already said that developers are free to use the 6TFs however they want. Once we get closer to Scorpio's launch they'll obviously change their tune.
Check out the Samsung JS9000 if it's in your budget. Very, very low input lag for a 4K UHD set (better than most HD sets) at 22ms in game mode. I have the 65" and gaming on it is unreal. I couldn't be happier and I'm notorious for being super picky with this kind of stuff.
Ppl saying nope to this...isnt the Neo and the PS5 basically the same thing? Dont you need a 4K tv to see the differences vs the PS4?
Like when I got my first 360 I still had a SD tv and it was a huge difference when I finally got an HDTV.
Uh oh...lol.
Yep.Ms strat- throw things under the bus to sell current things instead
Honestly, thats just it. Nothing more to it.
What would happen if a player playing at 60fps met a player at 30fps in multiplayer? Would someone have an advantage?
Kinda just un-sold me on Scorpio
Wow. If Scorpio offers nothing but higher rendering resolution what's the point?
I mean 4k is nice but he's making this sound like the box will be $600 or something.
If the neo can come in at $400 and offer tangible performance and visual upgrades at 1080p it will look like a more attractive product for most people I think.
I can already see the concern when most Scorpio games are 1080/1440p.
Spencer needs to keep quiet for a while.
No it isn't, PS4 neo will have 4K video output but games will target 1080p/60, maybe even 1440p/60....
From the leaked docs, Neo sounds like more of a middle ground. Sony expects some 4K games ('more pixels), but also suggests higher fidelity/framerate @ 1080p for more intensive games ('better pixels'). Houses comments talk about 'prettier games' and 4K 'content' - which to me suggests the 4K slant to Neo will be a bit more about general media content than games.
PS5 ought to offer more pixels AND better pixels. Not simply PS4-fidelity at 4K.
What the hell is a PS5? According to the leaked stuff, Neo would have "Neo mode" for games which would involve some kind of improved performance/res/etc and has nothing to do with gaming at 4K.
Assuming this whole thing isn't just a misunderstanding, PS4 Neo would be an upgraded PS4 in every sense of the word. It'd support 4K for UHD BR and streaming, but the improved tech specs would be about improving PS4 games to run better, rather than bumping the native resolution to 4K (which, based on leaked hardware specs, wouldn't be practical).
While the XBO stuff would mean the S model is just a slim version (plus adding UHD/4K streaming support) and the Scorpio is an upgraded version meant for 4K TVs that unlike the Neo would be using its power entirely to run games at 4K.
It's that last bit that sounds dubious to me, but MS has done some weird shit before, so who knows.
Yes for people with 1080p tvs. I whole heartedly agree. But the inverse can be applied for those that have 4K tvs. The Scorpio will be the more attractive product.
This is just proof why Sony's business mentality is way ahead of Ms's and why Ms will never be as successful. If you don't have a clear road paved ahead just stfu and don't confuse your consumers like this, especially when you've got another console coming up in the next months.
And some still wonder why Sony is so quiet about Neo.
buying a UHD/4K TV was on my list way before Scorpio anyway (Black Friday-ish), duh
I need the UHD TV as a pro-Scorpio argument for the wife anyways, I need to justify a second XBONE (and later a second PS4)
I think there are simply too many mixed messages being thrown around. They should've revealed the consoles, settled on a unified stock answer for them, and let the consumer decide how they want to fit these consoles into their homes. This is a bit messy, and I refuse to believe there will be no advantage without a 4k TV.
Come on MS..
WTF! I realize the memo has been sent out today downplay Scorpio, but this statement is ridiculous. Microsoft is a $400 billion dollar company. Sony''s market cap is around $35 billion. MS just drop $26 billion (all cash) on LinkedIn like nothing. I know gaf is video game bubble but gees.
He should have worn more t-shirts.Is this the turning point for the creepy "I believe in Phil Spencer" GAF contingent to see him less as the man of thier dreams and more of the PR spokesperson who says just enough for you to fill in the blanks as what you want to hear?
So basically:
XBO - 720P -1080P 30fps on 1080p TV
Scorpio - 4K 30fps on 4K TV
Scorpio - 1080p 30fps on 1080p TV
If this is how it is going to be I can see why it would be waste without a 4K TV.
That may have been hyperbole, but you have to admit MS's messaging for much of this console generation has been a mess.WTF! I realize the memo has been sent out today downplay Scorpio, but this statement is ridiculous. Microsoft is a $400 billion dollar company. Sony''s market cap is around $35 billion. MS just drop $26 billion (all cash) on LinkedIn like nothing. I know gaf is video game bubble but gees.
That doesn't make sense. Computers don't really work that way and also current gen games are already struggling with that slow CPU.
No downsampling or 60fps then? Seems like a missed opportunity.
Is this the turning point for the creepy "I believe in Phil Spencer" GAF contingent to see him less as the man of thier dreams and more of the PR spokesperson who says just enough for you to fill in the blanks as what you want to hear?
Don't like the sound of this.
6tb of power and all I can have is Xbox One games at 4K. Wanted to be blown away but with just a resolution bump that's not gonna happen.
Yes for people with 1080p tvs. I whole heartedly agree. But the inverse can be applied for those that have 4K tvs. The Scorpio will be the more attractive product.
So basically:
XBO - 720P -1080P 30fps on 1080p TV
Scorpio - 4K 30fps on 4K TV
Scorpio - 1080p 30fps on 1080p TV
If this is how it is going to be I can see why it would be waste without a 4K TV.