thewhitehawk
Member
I apologize if the tone of my message was offensive or condescending. I suppose that backlash was a pent up rage that accompanies being a Microsoft/Nintendo customer on the Gaf. It was meant to be towards the situation and a group(the Sony fanboys whom 99% of have a superiority complex the size of the Milky Way), and not at any individual. I am tired of being treated with condescension by said fanboys because I do not share their same love of Sony., especially on the Gaf over the last 8 months.
As far as each company aiming for a different demographic, I would like to respectfully disagree. When looking at first party titles, both companies have a racing sim, party games, a big budget FPS, a big budget TPS, and an adventure series. Beyond that, it is all 3rd party content. Content that, before this past generation, you could easily say that Somy had locked up. But with MGS and FF going multiplatform this generation, and most other companies following suit as well, there is not really that much of a difference between the demographic that both company aims for. What it really falls down to is personal preference.
I just really wish that the Internet could understand this concept and like what they like without feeling the need to criticize someone else's personal preference. I accept that some people dislike Microsoft. I understand that some people dislike Nintendo. That's ok, because it doesn't affect me in one bit. I just wish that the hardest of hardcore fanboys of all 3 consoles would simply be content enjoying their system without belittling others for their choice!
I agree with you that both companies, at launch, have very similar game lineups, but when you look at the PS3's entire lineup of exclusives and compare it to Microsoft's you will find that there is a distinct difference in tonality overall in the lineup. The biggest titles where Microsoft puts more of its support behind are the sports games and first and third person shooters. This is what they start or end with at nearly all of their game presentations. To deny this is honestly to lie.
Some of the most creative and innovative games on Microsoft's platform came from small or independent developers. Games like Shadow Complex, Braid and Fez among many others. But during the course of the 360's lifecycle most of the developers behind those titles expressed public disappointment with the terms Microsoft had presented to them and made it publicly aware that there were unreasonable publishing platforms.
Now, with the Xbox One's launch most of those policies have been altered and improved significantly, but it's clear by looking at all three presentations that both companies have had that one of them clearly has more independent developers on its side, even on a platform that has a mediocre install base like the Vita.
From where I'm standing, and I admit that my perspective is biased towards Sony right now, it seems to be that one company is focusing on the great AAA titles that helped make it successful, while the other company is focusing both on the AAA franchises that are successful in its platform and also providing good support and promoting games developer by smaller or independent studios.
Just like me, so far, it seems that the smaller or independent developers that aren't either owned or fully funded by Microsoft seem to be more reticent to support the platform right now, but at this point this may be speculation because they may be working on software but just haven't announced anything. But so far the message that Sony has been broadcasting loud and clear to the gaming market is that they have the best platform for independent developers. Given how many of them have been released in the past months and how many they announced recently, it's hard to argue against that.
In a week we have TGS which will showcase what the eastern developers have in store for next generation of consoles. Given how Microsoft has shown very little interest in that market so far (with the Xbox One), it wouldn't be surprising to a stronger showing of software for the Playstation 4 platform.
I don't think you should generalise people who appreciate Sony's products as mindless fanboys, specially so soon after some of Microsoft's own fans loudly defended some of the very bad anti-consumer measures and restrictions at the unveiling, and weeks following, of the Xbox One.
A lot of consumers simply prefer Sony's lineup, just like you prefer the Xbox One's, and there is also a pronounced number of people who are distrustful of Microsoft right now because of what they attempted to do and the way they communicated with consumers.
As another example, I like Windows Phone 7 but after Microsoft failed to provide support or an upgrade plan for early adopters to get Windows Phone 8 I don't trust that they'll be able to provide me as long-lasting support for any of their smartphone products as some Android phone manufacturers or Apple.
Being distrustful of a company because of their past actions is a perfectly legitimate reason for choosing a product over another. You shouldn't put all of the people who appreciate Sony in the same basket. Most of us have coherent and legitimate reasons for our choice, just like you surely have yours.