I'm not saying it does, but I'm questioning the hostility some have to any single square inch of skin on display. Some people really do take it so far it's not simply not personally enjoying any sort of nudity or sexual display, but ferocious projection onto the whole world and anyone around them. It verges on shaming, hence why I and others prod them to question how do you behave/think around actual women who do not think like you. Some might, but others, Joosten clearly being one, do not feel as aggressively adamant that skin and nudity is always something to scorch the earth around.
There is no moral or definitive arbitrator on display of sexuality. Unless you personally want to tell anyone who has cosplayed as Quiet and felt empowered/sexy that they are internalized mysognists and wrong to feel they're displaying sexuality. The gaming industry has problems with respect, aggression, sexism and behaviour. I said as much in that post I asked Crossing to read. The gaming industry does however also have issues with some male gamers acting like they control women and are the assigned arbitrators of any sort of depiction of the female body/nudity/skin/sexiness. The biggest difference between Bayonetta and MGS5 is Kojima tried to make up an excuse for Quiet. He instead should just have been honest, he wanted to create a character like that for a display of sexuality and to cater to a male audience.
I wonder if some of you go as finger wagging to females who enjoyed reading 50 shades? I recommend men especially read these two articles before acting like they have all of this sussed out
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...01205/the-triggers-sexual-desire-men-vs-women
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...iggers-sexual-desire-pt-2-what-s-erotic-women