• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

"But It's Not Historically Accurate!"

Wasn't The Order written by someone of East Indian heritage? And didn't it have two East Indian women as supporting cast?

Either the writer of the article didn't play the game or he/she chose an incredibly bad example to use.
He's of Sri Lankan descent, which is more South Indian than anything else.

I might actually have to check out The Order hearing about this Indian character.
 
No, she didn't, it's just that fans of the game are choosing the wrong point to harp on and want to defend the game at all costs.

Sounds to me like you're just trying to attack the game at all costs. She claimed the cast was white washed, but it turns out that it isn't, and the minorities in it are major characters. I don't see how they're wrong in wanting to defend it.
 
And none of those small glimpses could've included characters that weren't white?
Considering that she wears a rebel style outfit it would very clearly be a spoiler. Like i don't understand why you think there's some conspiracy here.
 
He's of Sri Lankan descent, which is more South Indian than anything else.

I might actually have to check out The Order hearing about this Indian character.

He was using the archaic version of "East Indian" which is analogous with South Asian, since "West Indian" refers to people of the Caribbean.
 
Now we're honestly complaining about characters from England being white?

There is white washing issues but this crusade that every character needs to be a minority now is almost just as annoying.
 
Also most members of the order are
hundreds of years old
so they don't necessarily represent the racial demographics of 1800s England.
 
But why couldn't one of the main characters be Indian?


So main she couldn't be part of any of the promotional material?

And yet, all the marketing material featured nothing but white characters.

Because it's a story spoiler.

Is it common practice to market spoilers?

looks to me people have chosen the wrong game to prove their points lol.

I remember the same kind of arguments being made for Kingdom come deliverance, I personally don't think it's the biggest issue around, people just think of white people in those times and considering it's a game based on fiction, expecting to be accurate is hopeful at best, I mean there are Werewolves running around in the Order.
 
Sounds to me like you're just trying to attack the game at all costs. She claimed the cast was white washed, but it turns out that it isn't, and the minorities in it are major characters. I don't see how they're wrong in wanting to defend it.
They're willfully missing the point to defend the game.
 
There are multiple minority characters important to the plot in The Order and they'll definitely be even more prominent in the sequel.

Period. Really, there's not a single word to add.

And yet, all the marketing material featured nothing but white characters.

Marketing material has shown close to nothing. The reasons have been given, so tell me please, how is this a problem?
 
No, she didn't, it's just that fans of the game are choosing the wrong point to harp on and want to defend the game at all costs.

I take it you're in the "Bayonetta is the most sexist portrayal of women" crowd which always seems to ignore the fact she was designed by a woman?
 
They're willfully missing the point to defend the game.
You're willfully ignoring the fact that that the example used to prove the point was a very bad one while also making blanket statements about the actual people saying so. There are plenty and I mean plenty of valid criticisms for the order. You can check my post history for many of my criticisms of it. But inclusion is not one of them.
 
Sounds to me like you're just trying to attack the game at all costs. She claimed the cast was white washed, but it turns out that it isn't, and the minorities in it are major characters. I don't see how they're wrong in wanting to defend it.

It's not even a defense. It's a correction. Kind of pathetic that so many people on the site can only look at things in that sort of way; needing it to be some juvenile framework of discussion of haters and fanboys with nothing between.

Edit: Game could use more diversity probably, though I'd have to go back through and see how the higher populated area (poorer, rebel-held White Chapel district/area) handles it. There's a dock area, but you only see one non-combatant NPC there, and all/most of the enemies at that point I think are caucasian.
 
Considering that she wears a rebel style outfit it would very clearly be a spoiler. Like i don't understand why you think there's some conspiracy here.
Why would that be a spoiler? If people didn't know what rebels were, then an out of context shot of someone in the uniform wouldn't mean anything and if they did, then how would they know that the character was a major part of the plot from a single shot?
 
I take it you're in the "Bayonetta is the most sexist portrayal of women" crowd which always seems to ignore the fact she was designed by a woman?

Ah the good ole "a woman can't be misogynist" defense.
There's ways to defend Bayonnetta's portrayal but that's really not a good one.
 
They're willfully missing the point to defend the game.

So you complain about not enough minorities in The Order, a lot of people point out that the 2 most important characters in the game besides Galahad are minorities. And you think the developers aren't giving away major story spilers in ads because they don't like minorities?
 
Now we're honestly complaining about characters from England being white?

There is white washing issues but this crusade that every character needs to be a minority now is almost just as annoying.
Who is saying that every character needs to be non-white?
 
Why would that be a spoiler? If people didn't know what rebels were, then an out of context shot of someone in the uniform wouldn't mean anything and if they did, then how would they know that the character was a major part of the plot from a single shot?

People knew what the rebels were. It's part of the marketing material.
 
She is. Did you play the game?

If they explained who she is, that would spoil a critical element of the storyline in the game.
Of course I haven't played it. I didn't realize the Order was a must play game. As a person of Indian descent, I still don't get to see my color represented in any type of marketing.

Consider it from my perspective.
 
I take it you're in the "Bayonetta is the most sexist portrayal of women" crowd which always seems to ignore the fact she was designed by a woman?

Just because a woman designed a character doesn't mean the character can't be sexist or misogynist.

Bayonetta is, across the board, complicated to discuss from a sexist/feminist perspective. I don't necessarily think there is a black and white "right" way to view the character.

People knew what the rebels were. It's part of the marketing material.

Thanks for explaining. I wasn't familiar with any of The Order's marketing, outside of "Old London people with mustaches, armor, and cool guns".
 
Why would that be a spoiler? If people didn't know what rebels were, then an out of context shot of someone in the uniform wouldn't mean anything and if they did, then how would they know that the character was a major part of the plot from a single shot?
I suppose you think they should've spoiled the part about
vampires
as well considering it would be out of context. Yes it would mean something, people who picked up on it would've been proven right and thus likely
even more
disappointed with the story since they guessed it. Plus, have you watched a single trailer of the game? Seriously have you? Because nearly all of the marketing material after the original debut trailer, and the gameplay demos, have been about the order fighting rebels.

Of course I haven't played it. I didn't realize the Order was a must play game. As a person of Indian descent, I still don't get to see my color represented in any type of marketing.

Consider it from my perspective.
It's not a must play game, trust me.
 
Why would that be a spoiler? If people didn't know what rebels were, then an out of context shot of someone in the uniform wouldn't mean anything and if they did, then how would they know that the character was a major part of the plot from a single shot?

Changing the goal posts. Now you're just quibbling over marketing details rather than the actual issue of representation in games.

A women worked on it but it's all filtered through kamiya, right?

So? Bayo is still a female power fantasy character designed by a woman that has been slut-shamed by people who likely have never even played the game.

Bayonetta is, across the board, complicated to discuss from a sexist/feminist perspective. I don't necessarily think there is a black and white "right" way to view the character.
.

Try telling that to the people who unequivocally voice their disgust about the character
 
Just because a woman designed a character doesn't mean the character can't be sexist or misogynist.

Bayonetta is, across the board, complicated to discuss from a sexist/feminist perspective. I don't necessarily think there is a black and white "right" way to view the character.
I love this argument. "She was designed by a woman so now way she could be sexist". Was she animated by a woman as well?
 
Ah the good ole "a woman can't be misogynist" defense.
There's ways to defend Bayonnetta's portrayal but that's really not a good one.
EDIT: Nevermind. This thread is past attempting to make logical points.

This whole thing has gone so far up its own ass at this point, it's unbelivable.
 
A lot of you seem to be missing the main point. It's not that games are required to have minorities or diversity or that sort of thing, it's that using "historical accuracy" as a justification is almost always flawed because

1. The games often has fantastical elements, which throw any semblance of accuracy out the window or,
2. History shows those regions were actually more diverse than the games would have you believe. Especially if we're dealing with large regions or population hubs/trade cities
 
Of course I haven't played it. I didn't realize the Order was a must play game. As a person of Indian descent, I still don't get to see my color represented in any type of marketing.

Consider it from my perspective.

But isn't that changing the base argument. We went from lack of minority representation to lack of minority representation in marketing.

The fact is that Order has two prominent minority characters. One of them plays a large part in the story, arguably larger then any other character aside from Galahad.
 
Of course I haven't played it. I didn't realize the Order was a must play game. As a person of Indian descent, I still don't get to see my color represented in any type of marketing.

Consider it from my perspective.

Marketing aside, The Order is one of the few games where Indian characters are central to the plot of the story. So if that's something you care about, then the game is a must-play for you.
 
Of course I haven't played it. I didn't realize the Order was a must play game. As a person of Indian descent, I still don't get to see my color represented in any type of marketing.

Consider it from my perspective.

I'm a Turk and I don't get to see my colour (well we're white I guess, but still) referenced in any type of marketing either. Well except Hakan, but he's more of a beast-type character and less of a normal representation.

How will Western/Japanese game developers make us all happy?
 
You're willfully ignoring the fact that that the example used to prove the point was a very bad one while also making blanket statements about the actual people saying so. There are plenty and I mean plenty of valid criticisms for the order. You can check my post history for many of my criticisms of it. But inclusion is not one of them.

A game you haven't even played and know close to nothing about.

And what exactly are you trying to do?

So you complain about not enough minorities in The Order, a lot of people point out that the 2 most important characters in the game besides Galahad are minorities. And you think the developers aren't giving away major story spilers in ads because they don't like minorities?

Or maybe people get the point while still correcting misinformation about the game?

This is what happens when people get overly-defensive about a game.

The point of the article, and my first post, is that people will constantly use the "historical accuracy" argument to justify the lack of non-whites in games. Prior to The Order coming out, there were a lot of people in here defending the lack of non-white characters in the world (as people keep saying, the two Indian characters who appear were not shown in any marketing materials) by making comments based not on historical fact but on a whitewashing of history that is present in popular culture. It's not a criticism that is limited to The Order but it is the most recent game in which this has come up, which is why it was mentioned.
 
Of course I haven't played it. I didn't realize the Order was a must play game. As a person of Indian descent, I still don't get to see my color represented in any type of marketing.

Consider it from my perspective.
If you're going to make an argument about something, it would be wise to at least know what you're talking about. Are you the type likes to use words that you don't know the definition to? It's not a good look, for anyone.

Also, super honest question from one minority to another (I imagine); how did you get into gaming if you only play games with characters that look like you? Being a black dude myself, there's absolutely no shot I would have become a gamer if I only played games with main characters that looked like me, and even in games with characters that looked like me... there's no way in hell they were going to MARKET the game with those characters.

EDIT: I may have misread your comment, and if I did, I apologize for that. I read it as you saying you didn't play The Order because you weren't represented in the game/marketing for the game.
 
So main she couldn't be part of any of the promotional material?

She's not introduced proper until about 1/3 of the way in, and it's a secret, essentially. So no, that would've spoiled it and who she was.

If there's a sequel, she'll likely be in the promo material, considering how the events play out.

Quit reaching.
 
Why would that be a spoiler? If people didn't know what rebels were, then an out of context shot of someone in the uniform wouldn't mean anything and if they did, then how would they know that the character was a major part of the plot from a single shot?

People know who the Rebels are.

The original argument was that the game didn't have much in the way of representation. That was corrected. Suddenly the goal post was moved to marketing. Marketing for a game that was incredibly light on content, even taking into consideration how short the game is.

Part of the mystery is who these rebels are, who is organizing them, and why do they seem tied with the half-breeds that The Order deal with. Showing that character would give away some of that, and most if not all of her scenes and such don't leave much wiggle room to show her off without it giving away one of the beat changes in the game.

I get it, I really do. But it's not the right game to really be going at in this case.
 
A lot of you seem to be missing the main point. It's not that games are required to have minorities or diversity or that sort of thing, it's that using "historical accuracy" as a justification is almost always flawed because

1. The games often has fantastical elements, which throw any semblance of accuracy out the window or,
2. History shows those regions were actually more diverse than the games would have you believe. Especially if we're dealing with large regions or population hubs/trade cities

There's a funny case with more modern westerns being criticized of "affirmative action" for including black characters, when in fact that's more historically accurate and it's all the classic westerns from the 20th century being so whitewashed gave people a skewed perspective on the setting.
 
This is what happens when people get overly-defensive about a game.

The point of the article, and my first post, is that people will constantly use the "historical accuracy" argument to justify the lack of non-whites in games. Prior to The Order coming out, there were a lot of people in here defending the lack of non-white characters in the world (as people keep saying, the two Indian characters who appear were not shown in any marketing materials) by making comments based not on historical fact but on a whitewashing of history that is present in popular culture. It's not a criticism that is limited to The Order but it is the most recent game in which this has come up, which is why it was mentioned.

You don't get to post an article with factual inaccuracies and call people defensive when they point it out.

Hence, as I said, poisoning the well of your argument with falsities.

So again, how would an out of context shot of a person in a revel uniform reveal that the person was a major part of the plot?

see this:

Part of the mystery is who these rebels are, who is organizing them, and why do they seem tied with the half-breeds that The Order deal with. Showing that character would give away some of that, and most if not all of her scenes and such don't leave much wiggle room to show her off without it giving away one of the beat changes in the game.

I get it, I really do. But it's not the right game to really be going at in this case.
 
This is what happens when people get overly-defensive about a game.

The point of the article, and my first post, is that people will constantly use the "historical accuracy" argument to justify the lack of non-whites in games. Prior to The Order coming out, there were a lot of people in here defending the lack of non-white characters in the world (as people keep saying, the two Indian characters who appear were not shown in any marketing materials) by making comments based not on historical fact but on a whitewashing of history that is present in popular culture. It's not a criticism that is limited to The Order but it is the most recent game in which this has come up, which is why it was mentioned.

You raise a very valid point but I don't think that's what the article was actually suggesting, unless I misread. Which is the only reason I tried to clear up the whole lack of minorities.
 
Top Bottom