-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
2015 Console Screenshot Thread (PS4, XB1, Wii U) [READ OP!]
- Thread starter VanWinkle
- Start date
Summer Haze
Banned
Halo 5 looks rough as hell in some of these shots. The poor IQ and lack of decent AF really ruins the presentation. Totally worth it for the framerate, of course, but I didn't expect it to look that bad.
Summer Haze
Banned
Was there an update for Driveclub that bumped the AF? I don't remember the road textures looking this sharp at the distance from the shots I've seen.
Halo 5 looks rough as hell in some of these shots. The poor IQ and lack of decent AF really ruins the presentation. Totally worth it for the framerate, of course, but I didn't expect it to look that bad.
Wow, I was just glancing through this page and was certain these were two shots of the exact same area from the exact same game, before spotting the titles.
I don't see how you could possibly tell either way from these shots, the road is completely blurred from motion blur to the point you can't perceive texture filtering anyways.
dr guildo
Member
AF is increased during photomode.
WhenNightFalls
Member
Those are gameplay shots. And I think the motion blur is just helping. Not sure if they did increase AF or not.
cyberFUTUR3
Member
The best looking bike game is... a car game.
Shame on the other bike games.
Shame on the other bike games.
Wait... why would being a bike focused game mean you'd be better looking?
cyberFUTUR3
Member
Because bike games are supposed to be focused on bikes. But bikes look better in DivreClub...
therealminime
Member
A fine looking game
These cement bag textures though...
Glorious cement.
These cement bag textures though...
Glorious cement.
ResidentDante
Member
That's some fine looking cement you have there!These cement bag textures though...
Glorious cement.
Morrigan Stark
Arrogant Smirk
Morrigan Stark
Arrogant Smirk
Dibils2k
Member
in screenshots for sure.. but majority of the campaign levels are spectacular and in motion you dont see the drawbacks for the 60fps as much
Baroquemantic
Member
Awesome shots! And yeah, those are some damn good looking cement bags.
They still look good! I really like this game's aesthetic. It reminds me a lot of LBP.
DOWN
Banned
Honestly I'm finding it pretty easy to get this game to look like film real photography imo
It's a pretty generic thing though... anything you could apply to modelling accurate cars would benefit bikes also, and any scenery and graphical features of Driveclub are just as valid for one as they are they other... I can't see how it's surprising or strange at all. I mean, I could understand if we were talking fighter planes or something, as then the scope of what's being drawn would change substantially.... but not bikes... that's just automatically saying that if you don't look better than Driveclub as a racer, then you should be ashamed. If a bike game looked better than Driveclub bikes... then it's probably look better than Driveclub period, if it added cars.
Jaded Alyx
Member
Use the browser method.
For Wii U a capture card would be better because you get PNG and 1080p for games like Smash 4(since Mii Verse can't go beyond 720p), but for the time being, that would be a decent alternative.
DOWN
Banned
Dog chill, he is just saying it is impressive that an arcade car only game was able to become the prettiest bike game by doing an expansion. It's a cool thing that they unexpectedly took on Bikes with the game and they did a good job in a way that pleases us graphic whores beyond what bike games have ever done
sure yeah but driveclub also had a larger budget than those other games and it kind of throws them under the bus for making a game for a particularly niche market
I am chill. I just thought it was a weird thing to say, and just followed up on my first post with my reasoning. Nothing much meant by it.
Reallink
Member
Maybe if you're sitting too far away from a ~350 motion resolution LCD, but it looks every bit as bad as the stills to me. Primary issues are the vast majority of the time it seems to employ the near 720p equivalent resolutions, which coupled with the bi/trilinear filtering, looks really bad. I'm not going to take a dump on on 343, cause I understand it looks like this due to 4 player characters running around, at 60fps, but lets not sugar coat the game looks like dog shit. MCC Halo 4 is a much better looking game, though it's obviously doing a lot less.
sacrificengineer
Member
Damn, son, DriveClub is seriously a game from a fucking outer space.
NullPointer
Member
And dumb is stupid good at taking amazing shots.
DOWN's black and white ones are also breathtaking. Seriously realized I wasn't breathing there for a moment.
Halo 4 and halo 5 look very similar. Halo 5 visuals are decent for being a 60fps game.
lol the game doesn't look like dogshit.
It is not 720p the vast majority of the time. It's more like 900p-1080p for >70% of the time.
It does not have dog shit graphics.
Thank fuck for the ignore feature.
DOWN
Banned
Halo 5 is quite underwhelming graphically, but that's not to say it isn't pretty. The cost of 60fps puts it up to speed for where people seem to like FPS performance (oddly even in single player) but behind the graphical fidelity of beasts at 30fps.
Nah, pretty sure Digital Foundry said its most frequently around 812p and the only times he could get it to hit 1080 were a few rare times when he tried looking in certain spots of the sky.
It most frequently sits around 1344x1080 in campaign according to df.
That's roughly 1,451,520 pixels on screen, which is slightly over 900p in terms of pixels being drawn.
Phreakuency
Banned
Not difficult with most games in greyscale.
And btw, I can't remember if the photo mode has a sharpen option, but if you are touching stuff up they really have no place in this thread, disclaimer or not.
Similar threads
- Poll