I'm happy I finished watching just before the inaugurationRuining HoC is just one of the many things I'm angry at this administration for.
I'm happy I finished watching just before the inaugurationRuining HoC is just one of the many things I'm angry at this administration for.
In the afterlife "Hell and Heaven loves me, I'm the most prestigious and virtuos person in the afterlife. No one is more virtuous and divine than me."
@realDonaldTrump
When I die, I will make heaven/hell great again! #MHGA
He's the fucking President of the United States, not an internet troll. You really don't get that, do you?If they really stopped covering anything about him he would actually be less popular and wouldn't had been as popular before as well. A complete no trump news ban would go a long way but they can't do it. They can't stop themselves. But, it would be fantastic to know he is basically non existent. They can still report on what the administration does and you guys are wrong to believe reporting negativity against him makes things change, just fuels his supporters more.
He would also flip out now m seeing everyone completely not give a shit about him. All his important events going completely unnoticed. Would be amazing
Just imagining him walking out to give a speech to a full media blitz and only seeing empty chairs and some college kid newspapers would just be too funny. If the press goes, they should film each other and give accounts of thier days or something. Make him disappear all the way to 2020.
"Upon my death, the United States will build me the world's largest pyramid and bury me there with my most treasured possessions. "
He's the fucking President of the United States, not an internet troll. You really don't get that, do you?
The only way ignoring him will work is if the entire federal government also agrees to ignore him and that's not happening.He's the fucking President of the United States, not an internet troll. You really don't get that, do you?
To be fair, after watching regular folk hold Tom Cotton's feet to fire with articulated questions, we'd be better off finding people off the street to replace the White House press corps. How many of these press conferences have we had? Almost one every day? I can only recall a handful of questions, and they largely came from foreign journalists.
Their ban has triggered a more substantial discussion about this administration than any of their questions at these events thus far, ironically.
To be fair, after watching regular folk hold Tom Cotton's feet to fire with articulated questions, we'd be better off finding people off the street to replace the White House press corps. How many of these press conferences have we had? Almost one every day? I can only recall a handful of questions, and they largely came from foreign journalists.
Their ban has triggered a more substantial discussion about this administration than any of their questions at these events thus far, ironically.
Just in every dictatorship on earth. The free press is an obstacle.Has this happened before?
Has anyone noticed this?
Yeah, they did this earlier this week.
Real as they are, those monkeys sound like the kind of folks who take Witch House/Vaporwave seriously.I often read these Trump threads and am put off by the constant hyperbole and reaction. However, The Atlantic had a really good article about the ideological foundation of Bannon and many of Trump's more prominent advisors and supporters.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...nternets-dark-anti-democracy-movement/516243/
It is concerning because these people have the Whitehouse now. It is a self described anti-democracy philosophy that is intent on "blowing the system up". The hatred of the "mainstream media" and the insanity of appointments like Pruitt and DeVos make sense within the context of their goals and beliefs. These people are not Republicans or conservatives in the traditional sense. And some of their beliefs approach overt bigotry and racism, allowing white nationalists to latch on.
But I think the real problem is that they are not wrong about the entrenched corruption and systemic failures of our government. They are not wrong about the divisiveness of identity politics and problems caused by globalization. These issues will continue to galvanize an increasingly large precentage of the population. Democrats, liberals, Republicans, and conservatives need to fight this movement by addressing these issues head on. I think this a major turning point in Western Civilization, for better or worse.
To anyone who is further interested in learning what these people are really about and what they want to achieve, I suggest looking up "neo-reactionary" and the "dark enlightenment". There is a fair amount of ugly in there, but their philosophy is not entirely bankrupt, which is the problem.
I disagree, I think he cares deeply about perception, and not just from an egotistical perspective. We are not his target audience. I recommend reading the Atlantic article I linked.
Surely no one is that despicable.Real as they are, those monkeys sound like the kind of folks who take Witch House/Vaporwave seriously.
I often read these Trump threads and am put off by the constant hyperbole and reaction. However, The Atlantic had a really good article about the ideological foundation of Bannon and many of Trump's more prominent advisors and supporters.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...nternets-dark-anti-democracy-movement/516243/
It is concerning because these people have the Whitehouse now. It is a self described anti-democracy philosophy that is intent on "blowing the system up". The hatred of the "mainstream media" and the insanity of appointments like Pruitt and DeVos make sense within the context of their goals and beliefs. These people are not Republicans or conservatives in the traditional sense. And some of their beliefs approach overt bigotry and racism, allowing white nationalists to latch on.
But I think the real problem is that they are not wrong about the entrenched corruption and systemic failures of our government. They are not wrong about the divisiveness of identity politics and problems caused by globalization. These issues will continue to galvanize an increasingly large precentage of the population. Democrats, liberals, Republicans, and conservatives need to fight this movement by addressing these issues head on. I think this a major turning point in Western Civilization, for better or worse.
To anyone who is further interested in learning what these people are really about and what they want to achieve, I suggest looking up "neo-reactionary" and the "dark enlightenment". There is a fair amount of ugly in there, but their philosophy is not entirely bankrupt, which is the problem.
I disagree, I think he cares deeply about perception, and not just from an egotistical perspective. We are not his target audience. I recommend reading the Atlantic article I linked.
Nothing in the constitution says that the white house have to even have press conferences, let alone provide equal access to them.UN FUCKING CONSTITUTIONAL
think about that Grand Ol Party
Nothing in the constitution says that the white house have to even have press conferences, let alone provide equal access to them.
It's a shit move, it breaks with a long and important tradition, but they can totally do this if they want to.
And I don't mean to be pedantic here, I think arguing about whether or not it's legal is the wrong battle to have, and one that the Trump administration I'm sure will would love to have right now.
Trying to be fair sure as hell didn't hamper right-wing media from growing an audience.Because the average person has little reason to try and be "fair" unlike mainstream media for better and worse.
They should really drop the ban of press.
If most of the press is being petty and biased or just asking inane questions over and over, you can use that to your advantage and everyone can watch and hear it
This. There is nothing illegal about this. Fight it on moral ground. Trump has done this his entire life. He doesn't care to hear dissenting opinions and doesn't have a thick enough skin to handle it.Nothing in the constitution says that the white house have to even have press conferences, let alone provide equal access to them.
It's a shit move, it breaks with a long and important tradition, but they can totally do this if they want to.
And I don't mean to be pedantic here, I think arguing about whether or not it's legal is the wrong battle to have, and one that the Trump administration I'm sure will would love to have right now.
Real as they are, those monkeys sound like the kind of folks who take Witch House/Vaporwave seriously.
Yeah, Trump's whole schtick, in politics as in business, seems to be exploiting loopholes. There's lots of things that presidents and administrations in the past half-century did or didn't do that seemed like ironclad rules because they were adhered to uniformly. Turns out they were followed not because they were mandated, but because they were just the right, decent things to do.Nothing in the constitution says that the white house have to even have press conferences, let alone provide equal access to them.
It's a shit move, it breaks with a long and important tradition, but they can totally do this if they want to.
And I don't mean to be pedantic here, I think arguing about whether or not it's legal is the wrong battle to have, and one that the Trump administration I'm sure will would love to have right now.
They should really drop the ban of press.
If most of the press is being petty and biased or just asking inane questions over and over, you can use that to your advantage and everyone can watch and hear it
Yeah I recently realized that the gun nuts with surplus military equipment in their basement to 'fight government tyranny' are the same people who are welcoming 45's facist actions with open arms.Fanatical "conservatives" will betray their own family members over political disagreements - don't think they wouldn't betray their country.
He's still calling it the "failing" New York Times?
NYT Subscriptions SOAR following Election Day
The press ain't the ones being petty or biased.
Failing upwards is still failing you know?
It's also one of the only papers he reads.He's still calling it the "failing" New York Times?
NYT Subscriptions SOAR following Election Day
Only he would say shit like this. Let's take a momentThe media has not reported that the National Debt in my first month went down by $12 billion vs a $200 billion increase in Obama first mo.
Haha had the exact reaction.Poor Ivanka.
OprahReciepts.gifTrump wants people to know about the national debt. And wonder why no one is covering it.
Only he would say shit like this. Let's take a moment
Nothing in the constitution says that the white house have to even have press conferences, let alone provide equal access to them.
It's a shit move, it breaks with a long and important tradition, but they can totally do this if they want to.
And I don't mean to be pedantic here, I think arguing about whether or not it's legal is the wrong battle to have, and one that the Trump administration I'm sure will would love to have right now.
I hope that whenever Trump is on his deathbed he truly understand how terrible of a person he is, ...
Trump wants people to know about the national debt. And wonder why no one is covering it.
Only he would say shit like this. Let's take a moment
Yep this is a junior post for sure. Point at media, say it's their fault for this and don't offer anything else except "huehue"This is essentially the News Media's fault. They let Trump get away with saying and doing insane things throughout the campaign in the interest of rating's, dollars.
Whoopsies! Now they're paying the real price.
Trump Admin got a head start in the war against Media, and the Trump's are now going on a full out de-legitimatizing campaign.
Media is trying to play catch up, but it may be too late.
Who do the American people trust more? The media? Or the government?
It'll be interesting to see who comes out on top!
God bless the USA.
Yeah it would be so funny to stop reporting on his actions so he gets to do whatever the fuck he wants and no one would know until its too late hehe xdddddddddddddddddIf they really stopped covering anything about him he would actually be less popular and wouldn't had been as popular before as well. A complete no trump news ban would go a long way but they can't do it. They can't stop themselves. But, it would be fantastic to know he is basically non existent. They can still report on what the administration does and you guys are wrong to believe reporting negativity against him makes things change, just fuels his supporters more.
He would also flip out now m seeing everyone completely not give a shit about him. All his important events going completely unnoticed. Would be amazing
Just imagining him walking out to give a speech to a full media blitz and only seeing empty chairs and some college kid newspapers would just be too funny. If the press goes, they should film each other and give accounts of thier days or something. Make him disappear all the way to 2020.
Mr bran. Is it Monday yet I need more whacky shit to happen