We're totally gonna focus on gamespot for the rest of this thread right
It's a review thread, what do you think
We're totally gonna focus on gamespot for the rest of this thread right
Erm that's weird. This is also the same guy who took part in GameSpot's Uncharted 4 spoilercast without finishing the story which I thought was dumb...So the Gamespot guy only played through half of each game?
It looks like he based his review on memories he had from 20 years ago about the game.So the Gamespot guy only played through half of each game?
We're totally gonna focus on gamespot for the rest of this thread right
Eh yea I guess that's true the whole scale needs to be used but I won't go on my rant about that lol.Of course. With how these websites use the review scale a 6/10 might as well be branding it as "Unplayable crap".
LOLLet's be rational about this ok guys this is fine we all know how crash plays nobody lose their minds crash is back relax stay calm
This won't happen
That first bad review bait![]()
+
Looks and sounds incredible, A lot of replayability for completionists, Time trial feature and leaderboards added to all three titles.
-
The mechanics haven't held up by today's standards, Deaths sometimes feel unfair, Not enough content for those not inclined to replay levels.
In Short: No matter what you think of the original games these are an excellent trio of remasters, that will please existing fans and help to create new ones.
Pros: High quality remaster that improves everything from the graphics to the controls. Good value for money and Crash still has a lot of charm.
Cons: The original games were always very simplistic, and they seem even more limited today. Racing sections are particularly poor.
That first bad review bait![]()
Of course. With how these websites use the review scale a 6/10 might as well be branding it as "Unplayable crap".
Seems like the only issue is that it's still a Crash Bandicoot game. So, if you just wanted the original formula, you'll probably be fine. If you expect a modern and up-to-date 3D plateformer, it might not be the best choice.
Erm that's weird. This is also the same guy who took part in GameSpot's Uncharted 4 spoilercast without finishing the story which I thought was dumb...
That first bad review bait![]()
We're totally gonna focus on gamespot for the rest of this thread right
Not enough content for those not inclined to replay levels.
Yea that threw me off a bit especially in today's climatewhat
"Not enough content for those not inclined to replay levels."
"Not enough content for those not inclined to replay levels."
"Not enough content for those not inclined to replay levels."
What Am I reading?
So low-mid 80s. Wasn't expecting otherwise from reviewers
So both low scoring reviews I read mainly complain about difficulty.
Uh..
Not enough content.....what?
3 games for less than the price of 1."Not enough content for those not inclined to replay levels."
"Not enough content for those not inclined to replay levels."
"Not enough content for those not inclined to replay levels."
What Am I reading?
what
Not knocking the score or anything, but this is one of the shortest reviews I've seen in ages. It barely touches upon anything.
Giving these games a 9 is total nostalgia.
They weren't even a 9 when they originally came out.