Eolz yes my point exactly and now its Nintendo who will lead again!
I'm sorry to say this so bluntly, but you really, really sound like a fanboy.
Add some meat to your claims of Nintendo "leading" once again.
Eolz yes my point exactly and now its Nintendo who will lead again!
Of course they are.
Now, investing tons of money in R&D to develop a new iteration of their console simply based on pure speculations that the NX will be powerful, and Nintendo getting back into the raw computing power race after being absent from it for two generations of home consoles, would be quite a dumb move for Sony/Microsoft, from a business standpoint.
Eolz yes my point exactly and now its Nintendo who will lead again!
Oh, no doubt they are!
But Nintendo seems to have a market (and ambitions) of its own, with little overlap. So even though they're watching, the competition may have little reason for concern (at least so far).
I'm pretty sure Sony is fine with PS4 numbers, Cerny's job and Kutaragi being far away.Not if they have already found out nintendos plans plus as i have said in other thread, Sony dropped the bomb with letting Cerny develop ps4 now they need to make a new one because he could not be as blue sky thinking as ken kutaragi and he only thought about getting something out quick . Now that has bit him back.
Nintendo have had nx is planning for years and dont have game developers making their machines unless they have the calibre of miyamoti or iwati.
Time will tell.
No way Sony or Microsoft are heavily invested into R&D, and making a generation .5, because of NX rumored to be powerful.
Not if they have already found out nintendos plans plus as i have said in other thread, Sony dropped the bomb with letting Cerny develop ps4 now they need to make a new one because he could not be as blue sky thinking as ken kutaragi and he only thought about getting something out quick . Now that has bit him back.
Nintendo have had nx is planning for years and dont have game developers making their machines unless they have the calibre of miyamoti or iwati.
Time will tell.
The most surprising thing about this thread is that anyone thinks Sony would be worried about Nintendo. The days of direct competition between the two have long since gone.
The most surprising thing about this thread is that anyone thinks Sony would be worried about Nintendo. The days of direct competition between the two have long since gone.
The most surprising thing about this thread is that anyone thinks Sony would be worried about Nintendo. The days of direct competition between the two have long since gone.
They thought that about the Wii and it bit them in the ass big time, Sony called the Wii note a lollipop and everything they were caught with their pants down and I doubt they will allow that to happen again even if people think it's unlikely.Oh, no doubt they are!
But Nintendo seems to have a market (and ambitions) of its own, with little overlap. So even though they're watching, the competition may have little reason for concern (at least so far).
Wait... so the controller is the console??
Can i ask what do u consider getting back to hardcore gaming?
They thought that about the Wii and it bit them in the ass big time, Sony called the Wii note a lollipop and everything they were caught with their pants down and I doubt they will allow that to happen again even if people think it's unlikely.
A "classic" console from Nintendo (I mean, similar to Xbox 360, Xbox One, PS3, PS4), with classic controls (gamecube-like controller), current gen hardware and features (online system, achievements/trophies) and a bit of future proofing (the SCD and cloud based computation shared between users), would be a home run for Nintendo.
I do not like the controller because I hate imprecise touchscreen controls. And the Wii-U shows that a controller can be responsible for the failure of a system.
But the image displayed, could it be the Final Fantasy XV Agnis Philosophy tech demo? The blue shaded stones look exactly the same.
https://youtu.be/UVX0OUO9ptU?t=21
I do not like the controller because I hate imprecise touchscreen controls. And the Wii-U shows that a controller can be responsible for the failure of a system.
But the image displayed, could it be the Final Fantasy XV Agnis Philosophy tech demo? The blue shaded stones look exactly the same.
https://youtu.be/UVX0OUO9ptU?t=21
I was in the realm of thinking this was definetly real but nintendo went nuts when wiiu controller was leaked, cease or decease was sent out almost immediately however if its been done deliberatly then! This would explain why thread is not closed. Or yes it is fake !
This would be the last thing Nintendo should be doing, honestly. Anyone thinking that yet another samey console would do well when the PS4 alone has that market on lockdown is utterly delusional. Also, we do not need another mid-range PC masquerading as a console. We already have two of those, for God's sake.
I'd rather have Nintendo try new things than perpetuate the stagnation that is the dualshock 'standard'.
Can't go back to a place you never left.
I am sorry but no I don't think so.
the Only reason MS started with this talk is because they want something that can beat the PS4 graphics wise and still play the current gen xbox games.
Sony saw this move and they don't want their PS4 to be less powerful. ( specially against Microsoft since they are the only direct competitors )
if Sony knows that MS wont be releasing Xbox 1.5, they wouldn't have bothered. nothing to do with Nintendo since this thing will never catch up in sales with the PS4 and Xbox One ( mid generation ) . 2 more years and we would have probably got a PS5 and Xbox Two if MS didn't start thinking of the incremental HW updates.
if Sony was afraid of Nintendo, they would just lower the price of the system to 300$ or 250$.
Sony doesn't really ( or any company for that matter ) will invest in new R&D when you are the leader of the generation and making the maximum profit . they were not afraid of MS during the original Xbox and Nintendo Gamecube. they knew no one would come close. Same thing is happening here really it's not that to figure out..
This time though, Microsoft isn't way far behind Sony and the later knows that too. that's why you are hearing about a PS4.5
which console you think the average user will buy ?a PS4 or an updated Xbox 1.5 that plays all the Xbox one games and more powerful system with enhanced features to the their current games ( example run games @ 60fps)
They already had remote play going on PSP in 2006. You could play ps1 games through it and ..Lair.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Play
Nintendo have not let me down yet with controllers etc that they just drop like sony with move etc.
I know nx wont be bc but i dont want it to be. I want nx to be as ppowerful as they can make it.
Plus i hear it will be able to somehow upgrade.
I look forward to e3
I agree, but they didn't talk like that at first initially it was lol Nintendo how people do now when Nintendo releases something quirky, after it started taking off they changed how they felt about it and the second outlook as you said was correct.The PS3 may not have sold as much units as the Wii, but I'm certain Sony ended up very happy with how it worked out.
The problem Sony had was getting traction with the PS3 due to its extremely high cost, not different market appeal. And in the market side of things, they ended up being right. Both could coexist as they had different appeals.
Manoko i agree but i think from what i have been told is that we wont be disappointed and if this is bull i will kick them everywhere when the reveal is done.
Can i ask what do u consider getting back to hardcore gaming?
I would blame Nintendo's third party support for that, over the controller.I do not like the controller because I hate imprecise touchscreen controls. And the Wii-U shows that a controller can be responsible for the failure of a system.
But the image displayed, could it be the Final Fantasy XV Agnis Philosophy tech demo? The blue shaded stones look exactly the same.
https://youtu.be/UVX0OUO9ptU?t=21
The controllers on the Wii were a disaster. Having to buy batteries for them is a huge hidden cost and of course the kids broke the battery cover right away.
I could buy several NX if it's $200, but none if it's expensive and you need to buy adapters, batteries and extra peripherals.
E3 should be interesting.
What you have been told ?
You have believable informed sources ?
Back to hardcore gaming for me would simply be to stop targetting an audience that is non-gamer.
So, no fun-for-a-time but not precise and limiting gimmicks, an architecture in line with its time to allow for third party support, an online service in line with the competition (things like voice chat for example (that are OS-based, not game based), which were absent from games like Splatoon for example, because Nintendo wants to be so inclusive of everyone that they frown upon features that would harm/scare children. By the way, a parental control system would have solved the problem for this).
Among other things.
What you have been told ?
You have believable informed sources ?
Back to hardcore gaming for me would simply be to stop targetting an audience that is non-gamer.
So, no fun-for-a-time but not precise and limiting gimmicks, an architecture in line with its time to allow for third party support, an online service in line with the competition (things like voice chat for example (that are OS-based, not game based), which were absent from games like Splatoon for example, because Nintendo wants to be so inclusive of everyone that they frown upon features that would harm/scare children. By the way, a parental control system would have solved the problem for this).
Among other things.
True, but the idea of using handheld with console is something Nintendo experimented al from the GameCube time. Gba with GameCube, it's all about the idea behind it.
lol this has zilch to do with remote play. Sega's vmu got there first anyway.
That's a little huge for me but i totally dig it, what about a vita sized one?
sorry for the rushed job and the PS buttons but it's just to get the idea, imo there's no need for touchscreen-only buttons.
Do people really think Sony is afraid of Nintendo? Pretty sure they're unafraid.
With potential haptic feedback touchscreen buttons, isn't there still the problem that once you feel them, it already registered the touch as a button press? I don't see any possibility for the player to locate the button by feel without activating it.
With potential haptic feedback touchscreen buttons, isn't there still the problem that once you feel them, it already registered the touch as a button press? I don't see any possibility for the player to locate the button by feel without activating it.
you need pressure sensing, latest iphone has it.