21:9 support?
Well it's been 5 years since Human Revolution and a new console generation in between. Not too surprising that graphics specs have changed quite a bit since then.
HR released towards the end of its gen, when PCs were generally running circles around every port.
I bet you there won't be a SLI profile day one. :-\
Hm, I guess, it just feels so weird to have the same card go from being able to max to not even minimum in 1/2 a decade.
Because recent times have shown that "NV massaged games" tend to work fine on AMD h/w while "AMD massaged games" constantly work like crap on NV's. And you can't put DX12 issues on drivers while in AMD's case the drivers do suck most of the time when there's a performance deficit in DX11/OGL.Why narrative like this is laughed at and everyone crawls out of woodwork to come up with stuff like "AMD drivers just suck ass!" when AMD users have concerns over NV massaged game(s), but now everyone seems to be silently nodding and agreeing?
Because recent times have shown that "NV massaged games" tend to work fine on AMD h/w while "AMD massaged games" constantly work like crap on NV's. And you can't put DX12 issues on drivers while in AMD's case the drivers do suck most of the time when there's a performance deficit in DX11/OGL.
So if I have 8gb of ram it's time to upgrade? what kind of issues could it possibly cause?
Longer loading times most likely, maybe drop of 1-2FPS every now and then if stuff needs to be shuffled in and out of memory mid-level, but that is unlikely. That said there really is no reason not to have 16GB now days.
Longer loading times most likely, maybe drop of 1-2FPS every now and then if stuff needs to be shuffled in and out of memory mid-level, but that is unlikely. That said there really is no reason not to have 16GB now days.
It's bullshit for the most part, 8 gigs is fine considering this is a console portSo if I have 8gb of ram it's time to upgrade? what kind of issues could it possibly cause?
So if I have 8gb of ram it's time to upgrade? what kind of issues could it possibly cause?
A lot of us are stuck between upgrade cycles like me. We have 2500/2600k's and buying 8 gigs of ram now almost feels like a waste knowing we are approaching end of life on our processors, as an upgrade moves us to ddr4. So it's either spend now to buy your self a little more time or save up and for a full system upgrade.
A lot of us are stuck between upgrade cycles like me. We have 2500/2600k's and buying 8 gigs of ram now almost feels like a waste knowing we are approaching end of life on our processors, as an upgrade moves us to ddr4. So it's either spend now to buy your self a little more time or save up and for a full system upgrade.
Stop getting played.
Anyone know if Cdkey.com is sending out keys yet?
Stop getting played.
True. 2500K has been insane workhorse and still seems to be kicking quite strongly. I guess one has to ponder how much longer one is going to still stick to that trusty horse, if going for few more years then putting that 40-50 down for extra 8GB of RAM could be good play. If one knows to be upgrading soon into Skylake or such then should keep that 40-50 towards all new rig with DDR4's.
?
Played?? This setup has lasted YEARS! Way longer than expected.
Just make sure you close all extra programs running. Completely close chrome, Dropbox anything in the task bar and all that before starting the game.
dropbox?
If another 4 years means approaching the end then yea......
Review embargo is August 18 or 19th btw.
You've got to wonder how having both Microsoft and Sony upgrade their hardware mid cycle is going to affect PC ports this gen. I thinking we won't see too much of a spec requirement increase, but you never know. I have a GTX 970, 16 DDR3, and an i5 GB 4460 so I think I'll be good for a while yet. I think I will upgrade to a GTX 1070 at some point, just seeing how my 970 will handle games over the coming couple of months.
I also want to know thisAny confirmation on 21:9 support?
Yeah they want be covered in case some noobs (like my friend ~_~) play this game with 2 dozens of chrome tabs and other apps open.It's bullshit for the most part, 8 gigs is fine considering this is a console port
It's just Eidos insuring their asses
Ha only 2 dozen? amateursYeah they want be covered in case some noobs (like my friend ~_~) play this game with 2 dozens of chrome tabs and other apps open.
It has denuvo for sure. That's why I got it for 35 freedom moneys off cdkeys.
32 dollars here, it was 31-32 for months before they boosted it to 35!
Constantly? I'm actually curious what titles have been under AMD's "flag" lately? DOOM performs better on NV HW, BFront is pretty much same for both camps just like BF1 Alpha and Hitman. Those are only IP's that I can quickly think as AMD ones, not 100% sure about DOOM.
Google is your friend. Doom isn't an AMD title while SWBF is and it does perform slightly worse than expected on NV. Hitman is a dumpster fire on NV h/w with its DX12 crashes and bad performance in any API.
TWW is turning from running great in DX11 to running bad in DX12 on NV under AMD's supervision. I fully expect the same to happen with Civ VI now which is also and AMD game.
AotS you can check out how's running in benchmarks. They still don't support async compute on Pascal after they've said so many words on how important it is for them.
Thankfully there aren't a lot of AMD sponsored games out there as their financial situation doesn't allow them to have more than a handful of these each year. But if you compare the results to NV's titles then you'll see why NV users may be concerned about AMD's meddling. Out of recent NV sponsored titles I can't think of even one which would run badly on AMD h/w. The last one was FO4 but even that was fixed with patches by the end of the year (and it relied on heavy tessellation which is a known h/w issue of Radeons). The Division and BlOps3 are running better on AMD h/w even though they are NV's titles. So is XCOM2. RoTTR is fine in DX11 on AMD and was patched to a relatively good state in DX12 recently.
When it comes to providing any kind of example of an NV game which is running badly on AMD h/w it's usually PCARS (year old game) or something even older than that. The situation have changed recently as most games are being optimized for AMD by default because they need to run on modern consoles. It's NV now who require special care from developers and it's very easy for AMD to disrupt this care in their titles.
oh lord i meet the minimum specs. might risk pc over ps4.
[edit] nevermind just read it has denuvo.
Excuse my ignorance on the DRM scene but why is Denuvo bad? I understand people actively dislike DRM but I constantly see hate for Denuvo.
True. 2500K has been insane workhorse and still seems to be kicking quite strongly. I guess one has to ponder how much longer one is going to still stick to that trusty horse, if going for few more years then putting that 40-50 down for extra 8GB of RAM could be good play. If one knows to be upgrading soon into Skylake or such then should keep that 40-50 towards all new rig with DDR4's.
?
Dude your card should be just fine for this game at 1080p. There's nothing wrong with that card. Hell since it's a game that prefers AMD over Nvidia hardware Ill bet your performance might approach or even beat my 980 ti's. Not for sure on that obviously but it wouldn't surprise me at all.How would a R9380 4gb deal with this? Kinda regret buying this card, but im stuck with it for a while.
Damn you guys with well-binned 920s.I have a PC with an i7-920 that still kicks ass today. 2500k will still be fine for quite a while.