Nice hoping for 60 fps maxed with my new build
I5 6600k, GTX 1070, and 16gb of ram.
I have a PC with an i7-920 that still kicks ass today. 2500k will still be fine for quite a while.
I was about to say that. It seems like people have settled on some kind of narrative where Vulkan is more performant than DX12 based on a sample size of 1 (or rather, 0.5 really).
Vulkan is preferable to DX12 for many reasons, but offering significantly better performance isn't one of them.
Hopefully not stock DDR3-1600.GTX 1070 / i7-4790K / 16GB DDR3 / Samsung Evo SSD / Win10
Hopefully, the game is properly optimized
These are just average FPS, min FPS in much lower for both NVIDIA and AMD and min FPS is much more important. Both of these games are very unstable and can't sustain solid 60 FPS most of the time even in 1080p with everything maxed using single GPU (not to mention 1440p). The one and only thing you can do to fix this "Fuck those with single GPUs" shit it is to use SLI - x2 980Ti's and maybe x2 390X's and it's only for 1080p 60.Ashes and Warhammer run fine on Nvidia hardware. The performance advantage for Radeon with Hitman isn't any more egregious than it is for Geforce with Tomb Raider:
Yeah, AMD has started to become great again (it took them almost 10 years) and it is a good thing.Bolivar687 said:AMD already had two advantages going into 2016 - 1) the console monopoly now paying off as the development cycle matured and 2) the much improved driver support under the newly formed Radeon Technologies Group. With both these factors in play, it shouldn't then be controversial when Radeon shines in the titles they themselves paid to sponsor. The Vulkan and DX12 advantage might seem unfair but they pioneered low level APIs with Mantle, so it's not really a conspiracy that they're further ahead in that department as well.
i5 4670k (OC to 4.2ghz)/8GB RAM/Gigabyte GTX 1060 G1
I think I should be able to run it on decent settings (I hope). Been toying with the idea of 16GB ram but don't think I really need it.
Apologies if this has been mentioned, will this be a dx12 title?
I'll be preloading as I did with DX:HR. I remember being in the official thread of that game until the it unlocked at 12am.
Just bought a GTX 1080 today mmmyeahhh
GTX 1070 coming in 10 hours, I should sleep! Hopefully it can run this game at 1440p/60fps.
I'll round this off with the bab-y GTX 1060 I got last week. Ready to go.
If you're still on 8gb ddr3 1333 mhz ram (or similar) this might be a good opportunity to get 16gb ddr3 2400 mhz ram (or better). Ram speed seems to help in cpu heavy load situations in many games.
Interesting. How much is one of those rams nowadays?
My setup is still a couple of 4gb ddr3 1333mhz ram. It's been years...
Do you guys know what the file size is? On consoles?
IIRC around 36GB.
EDIT: Just under 39GB according to the Xbox store.
I'm not looking forward to the game as much as I thought I would be, but I'll definitely give it a fair shake and make the PC perf. thread.
Hopefully not stock DDR3-1600.
16 gigs of ram? Damn.
Proven inadequate for modern AAAs by Techspot.2133 HyperX Fury
What's wrong with 1600?
If I was able to run HR on High, would I be able to run this okay? Or at least on lowest settings?
I'm on a laptop. Was able to play MGS V on low/medium and Elite Dangerous on high
Couldn't find that, but here are specs from DxDiagCan you type "Device Manager" into your start menu search, click on it, and tell me what it lists under "Display Adapters"?
Couldn't find that, but here are specs from DxDiag
Windows 8.1 64-bit, Intel i5, Intel HD 5500, DirectX 11, 8060MB RAM
For me 15-20 FPS is fine, but yeah I'll probably just wait. Hopefully it's well optimizedBased on those specs, I'd be surprised if it ran well at all even on lowest. Really it depends on what their definition of "minimum specs" are though. The minimum graphics card is much more powerful than yours, but it depends if that's truly the minimum for a 30 fps/720p with everything on low, or if that's more of a 30fps/1080p with some mediums.
Hard to guess really, I'd recommend you wait and see what the PC performance is before buying it.
Feel the same. I think it comes down to understanding my lofty hopes for the series will never be met; I won't get that same awe I had with OG Deus Ex in its day. Still looking forward to playing and hoping it improves over where they were going with HR, which was good, but not as wide ranging and variable as I wanted
I wonder why. Could it be something DX12 related? (Seeing as how W7 is listed as minimum and W10 as recommended.)
For me 15-20 FPS is fine, but yeah I'll probably just wait. Hopefully it's well optimized
Proven inadequate for modern AAAs by Techspot.