Crimson_Gold
Member
All DF has said is as far as they know 102GB/s is still the theoretical max for either read or write and no downclock.
They also don't know how MS arrived at the theoretical 192GB/s or the practical 133GB/s.
Thanks.
All DF has said is as far as they know 102GB/s is still the theoretical max for either read or write and no downclock.
They also don't know how MS arrived at the theoretical 192GB/s or the practical 133GB/s.
You know, true or not (and we all know it isn't) Microsoft's marketing just has a way of really getting under my skin. Look at the "full name" of the Xbox One in press releases, the "all in one entertainment system", what the fuck is with insisting on that in a PR release rather than just "Entertainment System"?"Day One" Edition of the console gets you an achievement saying you preordered/purhcased the most powerful console.
Is that good reporting?....All DF has said is as far as they know 102GB/s is still the theoretical max for either read or write and no downclock.
They also don't know how MS arrived at the theoretical 192GB/s or the practical 133GB/s.
It was on the showfloor? Its hard to find videos on youtube.Killzone was playable.
Is that good reporting?....
No. DF has failed their readership with this article for not answering basic question that have been asked by hundred people on various websites immediately after reading the article.Is that good reporting?....
Yeah it had one booth. AFAIK it was the jungle mission.It was on the showfloor? Its hard to find videos on youtube.
All DF has said is as far as they know 102GB/s is still the theoretical max for either read or write and no downclock.
They also don't know how MS arrived at the theoretical 192GB/s or the practical 133GB/s.
Let me sum up the secondary exchange that just went down:
Someone suggested that from what they saw of both games, Forza 5 looked more polished compared to Second Son. They said they'd had the chance to play both. Some people got really upset by this.
It was on the showfloor? Its hard to find videos on youtube.
Let me sum up the secondary exchange that just went down:
Someone suggested that from what they saw of both games, Forza 5 looked more polished compared to Second Son. They said they'd had the chance to play both. Some people got really upset by this.
You know, true or not (and we all know it isn't) Microsoft's marketing just has a way of really getting under my skin. Look at the "full name" of the Xbox One in press releases, the "all in one entertainment system", what the fuck is with insisting on that in a PR release rather than just "Entertainment System"?
And it's been happening for awhile, whether it was slathering Avatars on everything or using "Better on Kinect" rather than "Supports Kinect." Nintendo and Sony have been much drier with this stuff, whereas Microsoft likes to try to sugarcoat all of their stuff and it just makes it more offputting instead.
Mark Cerny is a contractor. Trolololol.My opinion:
- I feel that Sony has proven they are better engineers and manufacturers of electronic devices.
- I trust they will not compromise quality in order to save a few dollars.
- I also appreciate that all R&D for the PS4 (and PS3) was in-house, and not contracted out to some stupid west coast "artsy" marketing firm that resulted in the 360's craptastic design.
Mark Cerny is a contractor. Trolololol.
I guess this is the only take-away from this at the moment.No. DF has failed their readership with this article for not answering basic question that have been asked by hundred people on various websites immediately after reading the article.
Uhhh, as far as I know, Second Son was not playable at all at E3 to anyone but the devs.
GTX 580 = 1.56 TF
GTX 680 = 3.1 TF
Excuse my math if that doesn't make the 680 roughly 2x more or 200% more powerful on paper. My point is that games will not look the same order of magnitude better, it's just relative, but compare how those 2 cards DEMOLISH games running on a GeForce 7800GT which is basically what we're getting with the next gen console upgrade, then the difference is not that big of a deal, both cards are running what everyone considers "Next gen" visuals.
This is an even greater example but even still I think someone with a GTX 580 will do just fine.
My opinion:
- I feel that Sony has proven they are better engineers and manufacturers of electronic devices.
- I trust they will not compromise quality in order to save a few dollars.
I guess you never had to flip a PS1 over to make a game work eh?
I guess you never had to flip a PS1 over to make a game work eh?
Nope.
I guess you never had to flip a PS1 over to make a game work eh?
explains a lot then.
I'm not sure this practice is it so common, anyway :\ in any case, the hell it has to do with sony engineers?
explains a lot then.
You are seriously asking this question? Ok ill bite..
Back during the days of the PS1, there was an issue with the CD Drive in which it would basically stop working as intended. You had to actually sit the PS1 on its top for it not to crash games or what not. If that's not an engineering error I don't know what is..
We're getting way off topic here.
Hawk269 - you will PM me your credentials. We'll get to the bottom of this one way or the other. This derail has gone on long enough. You've got an hour.
Ok, back to the music.
Nope.
My opinion:
- I feel that Sony has proven they are better engineers and manufacturers of electronic devices.
- I trust they will not compromise quality in order to save a few dollars.
- I also appreciate that all R&D for the PS4 (and PS3) was in-house, and not contracted out to some stupid west coast "artsy" marketing firm that resulted in the 360's craptastic design.
- I do not trust Microsoft
Yeah, it explains how myself and vast majority of PS1 owners never had to turn the console over to make a game work.
Here you go from the WikiYeah clearly you don't know what is it.
The first batch of PlayStations used a KSM-440AAM laser unit whose case and all movable parts were completely made out of plastic. Over time, friction caused the plastic tray to wear outusually unevenly. The placement of the laser unit close to the power supply accelerated wear because of the additional heat, which made the plastic even more vulnerable to friction. Eventually, the tray would become so worn that the laser no longer pointed directly at the CD and games would no longer load. Sony eventually fixed the problem by making the tray out of die-cast metal and placing the laser unit farther away from the power supply on later models of the PlayStation.
Some units, particularly the early 100x models, would be unable to play FMV or music correctly, resulting in skipping or freezing. In more extreme cases the PlayStation would only work correctly when turned onto its side or upside down.
I think most people didn't have these issues... for example I never had any issue with my consoles, and just had one friend with this PS1 disc problem... the PS2 I have saw any issue outside the internet.or have a disc read error on PS2? every company has something in their history that wasnt top quality. Blind faith is never good.
I guess you never had to flip a PS1 over to make a game work eh?
You know what would be freaking awesome? Some developers round table where they speak freely about these systems. It's pretty shitty that they have to keep their mouth shut. We would get a much clear understanding of what to expect from the consoles on a hardware level.
I currently have a PS1 and have never had to do that. Have you ever owned one?
Care to elaborate what your opinion has to do with anything regarding this thread? Not that it's not appreciated..
Oh and a small detail: Cell R&D was anything but in-house, so much about "all" R&D in-house, after all it was the center piece of the PS3 and Sony's promotion.. And not compromise quality for a few bucks, how bout leaving HDMI cables out of the box?
But let's get back to topic, shall we?
or have a disc read error on PS2? every company has something in their history that wasnt top quality. Blind faith is never good.
I only saw the Mad Max press release refer to it as a "computer entertainment system", but I can't discount the very likely possibility that in any Sony released PR they officially say that. But try googling this: "Xbox One® the all-in-one games and entertainment system" and see what you get, don't forget the quotation marks. Some just say PlayStation 4, some like Elder Scrolls Online and Mad Max use "computer entertainment system", while Microsoft has that long formal title that's seemingly insisted on in all of them. It's a relatively minor nitpick to be honest, but it does seem to say something about their marketing and PR if nothing else.On Nintendo, you have a point. You realize the PS4 is Sony's "next gen computer entertainment system" though, right?
Holy fuck, that looks amazing! I can't believe I don't have this preordered. Remedying now.Disconcertingly unpolished? wat?
I'm still not seeing it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uibnf_Q_51s
Looks extremely fluid even in its rather early state. I'm not seeing any polishing issues.
Yeah clearly you don't know what is it.
I only saw the Mad Max press release refer to it as a "computer entertainment system", but I can't discount the very likely possibility that in any Sony released PR they officially say that. But try googling this: "Xbox One® the all-in-one games and entertainment system" and see what you get, don't forget the quotation marks. Some just say PlayStation 4, some like Elder Scrolls Online and Mad Max use "computer entertainment system", while Microsoft has that long formal title that's seemingly insisted on in all of them. It's a relatively minor nitpick to be honest, but it does seem to say something about their marketing and PR if nothing else.
I currently have a PS1 and have never had to do that. Have you ever owned one?
Who says it's blind faith? A disc read error vs. RROD? You can't even compare the two.