I hope he kept a copy of that letter and sues the fuck out them. Corporations wont care about this issue until it hurts them where they care the most: money.
I highly doubt that letter left with him, let alone even exists anymore.
I hope he kept a copy of that letter and sues the fuck out them. Corporations wont care about this issue until it hurts them where they care the most: money.
If true, this is disgusting, but lets wait and hear both sides before jumping the gun? If there is any merit to this persons' allegations, it should put enough pressure on ND to fire the harasser.
Isn't it odd that this person decides to come out after being unemployed for 17 months?
He sort of explained his reasoning for coming out now, which you either didn't read in your rush to discredit it or you did read and are ignoring in your fervor to defend it.If true, this is disgusting, but lets wait and hear both sides before jumping the gun? If there is any merit to this persons' allegations, it should put enough pressure on ND to fire the harasser.
Isn't it odd that this person decides to come out after being unemployed for 17 months?
If true, this is disgusting, but lets wait and hear both sides before jumping the gun? If there is any merit to this persons' allegations, it should put enough pressure on ND to fire the harasser.
Isn't it odd that this person decides to come out after being unemployed for 17 months?
You might've been witness to such, but you've got to remember that those represent a small fraction of accusations. Those aren't anywhere near of being common vs. real accusations. False accusations of sexual harassment & assault are more like a 1 or 2 out of a 100 thing, not something like 40 out of 100.Sorry for the late reply, but its because in those cases there were multiple allegations coming out at once and thus seemed more credible. In this case? There is just one guy so while there is a chance he was sexually harassed, there is an equal amount of chance he was not. The fact that he was fired... there is a missing link there but I will refrain from commenting or drawing further conclusions until evidence of some sort is provided.
And I don't mean to sound cold or anything, ultimately workplace harassment is a terrible thing but as someone who has been witness to a case of false allegations of sexual harassment and has seen how that can ruin one's life/reputation, I think a healthy dose of skepticism is always required. Treat this as you would any other allegation, as of now Naughty Dog and Sony are innocent because they have yet to be proven guilty of anything.
Either way I think its best to maintain a neutral stance until further information/statements surface.
You should read his statement.If true, this is disgusting, but lets wait and hear both sides before jumping the gun? If there is any merit to this persons' allegations, it should put enough pressure on ND to fire the harasser.
Isn't it odd that this person decides to come out after being unemployed for 17 months?
If the other side is this never happened, how long should it take them to say that?If true, this is disgusting, but lets wait and hear both sides before jumping the gun?
If true, this is disgusting, but lets wait and hear both sides before jumping the gun? If there is any merit to this persons' allegations, it should put enough pressure on ND to fire the harasser.
Isn't it odd that this person decides to come out after being unemployed for 17 months?
Sony/Naughty Dog will be preparing a response for Monday no doubt
It not the simple as it been explain before.One question though: why didnt he exposed the name of the person that harrassed him?
I honestly think it is way more detrimental the way he did. "A company lead". The witch hunt will go full force now and people that dont have anything to do with it can have their lives and reputation destroyed by the internet.
Just say the name. You already took the courage, expose the piece of shit.
Because free speech became a casualty in the cause of protecting people from false speech.One question though: why didnt he exposed the name of the person that harrassed him?
The most dastardly part of his plan was to admit that he was unemployed for seventeen months, because only a fool would expect us to believe an accusation like this from someone who was unemployed for seventeen months.
If he has no concrete proof as is often the case with sexual harassment he could get taken to court for slander for exposing the personOne question though: why didnt he exposed the name of the person that harrassed him?
I honestly think it is way more detrimental the way he did. "A company lead". The witch hunt will go full force now and people that dont have anything to do with it can have their lives and reputation destroyed by the internet.
Just say the name. You already took the courage, expose the piece of shit.
If true, this is disgusting, but lets wait and hear both sides before jumping the gun? If there is any merit to this persons' allegations, it should put enough pressure on ND to fire the harasser.
Isn't it odd that this person decides to come out after being unemployed for 17 months?
I'm not familiar with American industrial relations law, but even if you take the sexual harassment out of the equation completely, wouldn't the termination still be illegal? He says he had a mental breakdown at work and HR was involved prior to the sexual harassment claims even being made; if they then go and immediately fire him isn't that against the law? Unless when he said he had a mental breakdown he doesn't mean a mental health problem, but rather that he threw a chair at someone or something.
Gotta love the internet and society. It's always the person who makes the first claim that is usually considered right, because people never ever lie or stretch the truth.
I used to work in corporate and this female who cursed out a supervisor claimed it was me. All these rumors spread about how I did it, but when I met with that supervisor the next day and asked him what happened. He said it was her that did it. Naturally, nothing happened to me, but it didn't stop people from thinking I was the culprit.
That is why I'm not quick to judge like most people until both sides of the story are heard.
This guy has nothing to gain by coming forward.Gotta love the internet and society. It's always the person who makes the first claim that is usually considered right, because people never ever lie or stretch the truth.
I used to work in corporate and this female who cursed out a supervisor claimed it was me. All these rumors spread about how I did it, but when I met with that supervisor the next day and asked him what happened. He said it was her that did it. Naturally, nothing happened to me, but it didn't stop people from thinking I was the culprit.
That is why I'm not quick to judge like most people until both sides of the story are heard.
Gotta love the internet and society. It's always the person who makes the first claim that is usually considered right, because people never ever lie or stretch the truth.
I used to work in corporate and this female who cursed out a supervisor claimed it was me. All these rumors spread about how I did it, but when I met with that supervisor the next day and asked him what happened. He said it was her that did it. Naturally, nothing happened to me, but it didn't stop people from thinking I was the culprit.
That is why I'm not quick to judge like most people until both sides of the story are heard.
Why was Sony HR handling a ND sexual harassment issue?
I'm not trying to scrutinise or cast doubt on the victims story; I'm legitimately ignorant of how/why this would happen.
Why was Sony HR handling a ND sexual harassment issue?
I'm not trying to scrutinise or cast doubt on the victims story; I'm legitimately ignorant of how/why this would happen.
ND isn't an independent company. They're part of Sony, and as such, it is Sony's legal and HR departments that deal with matters like this.Why was Sony HR handling a ND sexual harassment issue?
I'm not trying to scrutinise or cast doubt on the victims story; I'm legitimately ignorant of how/why this would happen.
Sony owns ND. ND employees are Sony employees.
Ah, cheers. That clears that up. I thought ND was owned by Activision Blizzard for some reason.ND isn't an independent company. They're part of Sony, and as such, it is Sony's legal and HR departments that deal with matters like this.
You've got to be fucking kidding me. People who come out are often harassed, ignored & blacklisted even more for doing so, especially if it's about some publicly loved figure/entity (like Naughty Dog or popular actor). The reason so few harassed speak out is because of the all too real possibility of a potential backlash & negative consequences in their lives. Even if you speak true and there are consequences for the sexual harasser/assaulter, a lot of workplaces will look at you as a troublemaker who shouldn't be hired because you speak out about issues like that. And no business wants that. They like their silent sheep who don't cause trouble.Gotta love the internet and society. It's always the person who makes the first claim that is usually considered right, because people never ever lie or stretch the truth.
Don't think so.has there been any response from ND or Sony?
has there been any response from ND or Sony?
So sexual harassment is claimed and then fired the next day with a 20k silence payment attempted. Curious whom at Sony made this call because there are so many mistakes here.
You've got to be fucking kidding me. People who come out are often harassed, ignored & blacklisted even more for doing so, especially if it's about some publicly loved figure/entity (like Naughty Dog or popular actor). The reason so few harassed speak out is because of the all too real possibility of a potential backlash & negative consequences in their lives. Even if you speak true and there are consequences for the sexual harasser/assaulter, a lot of workplaces will look at you as a troublemaker who shouldn't be hired because you speak out about issues like that. And no business wants that. They like their silent sheep who don't cause trouble.
I wouldn't be shocked if this were there case. I'm surprised the silence payment was only 20k when I'm assuming he made a lot more per year.It's not unique to Sony. This is much more common than you'd think.
Who has been labeled guilty? David didn't provide a name.So I suppose it's guilty until proven innocent?
One question though: why didnt he exposed the name of the person that harrassed him?
I honestly think it is way more detrimental the way he did. "A company lead". The witch hunt will go full force now and people that dont have anything to do with it can have their lives and reputation destroyed by the internet.
Just say the name. You already took the courage, expose the piece of shit.
In these cases yeah, if someone was even namedSo I suppose it's guilty until proven innocent?
One question though: why didnt he exposed the name of the person that harrassed him?
I honestly think it is way more detrimental the way he did. "A company lead". The witch hunt will go full force now and people that dont have anything to do with it can have their lives and reputation destroyed by the internet.
Just say the name. You already took the courage, expose the piece of shit.
In these cases yeah
Are you for fucking real with this?So if I accuse you of sexually harassing me, you are okay with a mob of people coming after you?
There is no special case. It's always innocent until proven guilty no matter what.In these cases yeah, if someone was even named