• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

JonTron (youtuber) speaks against demographic "invasion" of America by nonwhites

Status
Not open for further replies.

Breads

Banned
18 minutes into the TotalBiscuit rant and he's now lamenting about identity politics. 19 minutes in and he is talking about gaming and anime consisting of vulnerable people on the spectrum.

The fuck am I listening to. I'm stopping now. What a brave man using this time to attack Gizmodo about what they said about what Jontron said.
 

LionPride

Banned
Yo I'm sick of this bullshit "Divorcing an artist form their art" bullshit

It always comes from people who aren't having the vile shit said against them
 
I love the pre-emptive, insincere defensiveness in the description:



TB's immediate and persistent attack on the messenger rather than actually addressing the subject and content of the article is an obvious defense of Jontron. Among the points against the "hit piece" reporting of what happened with Jontron is: "the site makes money using advertising." He goes into a stunted point-by-point defense of Jontron by attacking the authors, using the "missed opportunities" angle, and the "they're jealous of his wealth" premise, among many other gems. This whole script has the structure of a Sean Hannity segment, and that's no exageration.

TB insists on "divorcing an artist from his art," meaning in this case media should not respond to wide-reaching declarations by celebrities. Which is a cowardly and nonsensical response to a personality-based celebrity using that position to attempt to make legal and social change. I DO think people can and should attempt to bring about change for the better when they have the motivation, position and audience of someone like Jontron. But it's the job of the media and audiences to criticize those attempts, exactly like we've seen here.

Total Biscuit is suggesting that criticism is inappropriate. He lyingly says it's really about how they criticized Jontron, but the majority of his points are alien to that point. Total Biscuit's commentary here is trash.

I mean, this is the first tweet after the audioblog:

"Jon is getting the PewDiePie treatment"

If his intention wasn't defending JT, he did a piss job at it.
 
18 minutes into the TotalBiscuit rant and he's now lamenting about identity politics. 19 minutes in and he is talking about gaming and anime consisting of vulnerable people on the spectrum.

The fuck am I listening to. I'm stopping now.

The whole 2nd half of the rant is bizarre. And now I'm hearing my thoughts in this guy's voice, why the fk did I listen to the whole thing
 

Armaros

Member
TB does in fact say "Do I believe the things he said? No of course not." in the audio blog. He even calls himself a "british lefty", which is fucking laughable at this point.

But instead of actually talking about it, he just mentions it for 2-3 seconds and then spends the rest of the time just attacking Gizmodo, and significantly underplays everything Jontron said. That's not agreeing with JT exactly, it's a deliberate redirection of any anger away from him and towards Gizmodo instead.

AND normalizes jontrons ideas as just another political voice.

And not dangerous alt-right rhetoric infecting public discourse
 
TIL racist, white nationalist bile is just 'bizarre'.

And can we stop with this 'it's just a difference in politics' horseshit? Wanting different levels of regulation in the free market is a difference in politics. Thinking other races are inferior and 'diluting the gene pool' is just racist cuntery. There's no debate here, it's just wrong and should be condemned in the strongest terms.
 

MrHoot

Member
Also I love that one of his arguments, the one thing is more "offensive" is that Gizmodo didn't provide a source that rich blacks don't, in fact, commit more crimes that poor whites. Like it's not JonTron's job to do it as he advances this crazy thought, no no it should be GIZMODO's job.

Freaking unbelievable
 
Yo I'm sick of this bullshit "Divorcing an artist form their art" bullshit

It always comes from people who aren't having the vile shit said against them

Is pretty laughable when the art comes from the personality. So what this personality says and do is scrutinized. JT has +3million subscribers lots of them who admires him, why what he publicy says is not news?.

Also fuck, white nationalism and racism is not a political opinion that deserves any real consideration or acceptation.
 

TurboKiller

Neo Member
Classic whataboutism from TB there. You can literally see that he thought "How can I talk about this without coming down on my friend like a ton of bricks? I know I'll just make some facile points about this article rather than say anything substantial about the complete bullshit my friend was spouting earlier"

Utter coward.
 
Yo I'm sick of this bullshit "Divorcing an artist form their art" bullshit

It always comes from people who aren't having the vile shit said against them

well also usually that only works when that person's "art" is more artistically sound than "playing video games on the internet"
 

guybrushfreeman

Unconfirmed Member
I love the pre-emptive, insincere defensiveness in the description:



TB's immediate and persistent attack on the messenger rather than actually addressing the subject and content of the article is an obvious defense of Jontron. Among the points against the "hit piece" reporting of what happened with Jontron is: "the site makes money using advertising." He goes into a stunted point-by-point defense of Jontron by attacking the authors, using the "missed opportunities" angle, and the "they're jealous of his wealth" premise, among many other gems. This whole script has the structure of a Sean Hannity segment, and that's no exageration.

TB insists on "divorcing an artist from his art," meaning in this case media should not respond to wide-reaching declarations by celebrities. Which is a cowardly and nonsensical response to a personality-based celebrity using that position to attempt to make legal and social change. I DO think people can and should attempt to bring about change for the better when they have the motivation, position and audience of someone like Jontron. But it's the job of the media and audiences to criticize those attempts, exactly like we've seen here.

Total Biscuit is suggesting that criticism is inappropriate. He lyingly says it's really about how they criticized Jontron, but the majority of his points are alien to that point. Total Biscuit's commentary here is trash.

Yeah he's lying to himself if he really thinks that isn't a defence of this hateful shit. You can't say you're not defending it but then be all 'well no one should report on it' that's complete fucking bullshit
 

Sou Da

Member
18 minutes into the TotalBiscuit rant and he's now lamenting about identity politics. 19 minutes in and he is talking about gaming and anime consisting of vulnerable people on the spectrum.

The fuck am I listening to. I'm stopping now. What a brave man using this time to attack Gizmodo about what they said about what Jontron said.

The theme is "none of these people saying reprehensible things are responsible for themselves"
 
It's amsuing how few people actually take the effort listening and make dumb replies.

This is what he says a bit later on:

- Doesn't agree with Jon Tron in the slighest. He considers himself a Brittish leftie

- Finds Jon Tron's view quite frankly bizarre and wonders how he got them in in his head

- That being said, he seperates the art from the artist because otherwise he wouldn't be able to enjoy a lot anymore since if you go to the source of a lot of media, the creators often don't have great view either.

- Finds Gizmodo's article very poor because they asked for comment 10 minutes before the article went up. Lack of rebuttals to what JonTron said by factual information.

- Finds Gizmodo part of the problem that created the alt-right/white nationalism among gamers. (a surprising vunerable group)


Some of the stuff he says I'm a bit 'eh, a bit of a stretch'. But in no way is he defending JonTron of what he said. But he seems more annoyed at how poorly the article is written overall.
He absolutely is defending it when you go ~10 minutes doing nothing but attacking the article writer (when it's not even a story they covered first since Destiny interviewed Jon after the shit went down) instead of responding to anything and hand waves it away that it's none of our business how he came to his conclusions or why thinks what he thinks because it's his thoughts. It's a god damn strawman and whataboutism, he is absolutely defending JonTron. He just doesn't have the balls to come straight out and say it. Nice try though!
 

hawk2025

Member
If your first instinct is to make an audio blog carrying water for blatant racism, think about what that says about him.

He would rather make an audio blog about the problems with Gawker than address "diluting the gene pool".

Think about this.
 

luulubuu

Junior Member
Welp. Guess that's that then.

Dude's arguing that Jon isn't the best debater and is being taken out of context. Gif implies jon's kinda right too. Shame that Arin seems fine with Jon's shit.

Means that? I interpretated that "Jon is different from what's happening but THE SAME" maybe someone can tell us about the gif and the meaning?
 

one_kill

Member
Welp. Guess that's that then.

Dude's arguing that Jon isn't the best debater and is being taken out of context. Gif implies jon's kinda right too. Shame that Arin seems fine with Jon's shit.
I think you've interpreted it wrong... or perhaps I have?

I think Arin liked it because it showed how Jon is a joke and that his argument didn't make sense.

Means that? I interpretated that "Jon is different from what's happening but THE SAME" maybe someone can tell us about the gif and the meaning?
It's from the movie 'The Interview'. James Franco's character just landed in North Korea.
 

NotLiquid

Member
- That being said, he seperates the art from the artist because otherwise he wouldn't be able to enjoy a lot anymore since if you go to the source of a lot of media, the creators often don't have great view either.

I mean... good on the people if you can actually do that but the issue with "separating the art from the artist" is that in the case of people like Jon, PDP, h3h3, what-have-you is that they try to sell themselves as an integral part of the artwork.

If we talk about say, Phil Fish - someone who got a whole bunch of flack his way for being an unpleasant instigator, and how that reflected on Fez as it's means of existence was largely attributed to his name alone - I can understand why you would want to "separate the art from the artist" on that. He created something that isn't reliant on how much you enjoy him as a person. Sure, in a way our personalities and mentalities reflect on the arts we create, but depending on what those arts are they come across more subtle than others, and Fez isn't a game about Phil Fish.

But the same can hardly be said about many of these YouTube personalities where people aren't really watching them for the things they cover. Sure, that might be how they get introduced, but sustained viewership is wholly dependent on cult of personality and the fact that these people value what you say and think. This is perhaps less evident in Jon's videos because unlike many others he mostly deals with a scripted, theatrical and calculated "set piece" style review - and to his credit Jon is a good actor if nothing else (though his personality shines through the cracks in Game Grumps) - but when you put yourself and your thoughts on the front and center of your entire brand the line blurs tremendously once you start attempting to distinguish the artist from the art they create.

When you're an actor, you are the art.

And this is ignoring the fact that even if you separate art from the artist, what Jon is saying in this situation is so far on an incompetent deep end it is mind-numbingly frustrating to entertain.
 

tsumineko

Member
This is beautiful

QT4RCl7l.png
 

Complex Shadow

Cudi Lame™
I'm surprised people haven't kept up on Yahtzee (Ben Croshaw). I mean the fedora didn't give it away? :p There might be more examples, but I barely follow him and remembered this stuff. He's not gone white nationalist and alt-right like Jontron has, so far...but he's definitely anti-feminist, anti-social justice, and a bit more conservative.

Just not a fan of social justice:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZssC5Iw4XrA
"You know, whatever you think is currently the thing ruining video games, be it publishers, misogyny, social justice, Mumm-Ra or lead in the water pipes, it seems to be doing a fucking poor job of it because games have been pretty good lately. Maybe that's the equivalent of saying 'Ooh, it's a bit cold today, so much for global warming'. But I digress."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbNY1qgyuwY#t=1563
"If social justice tries to get up your case, all you need to do is flick V signs and blow an arse brick. Just whatever they say, go *blows raspberries*. At length. Keep doing it...Fuck you social justice for ruining the best day of that guy's life [shirtgate]."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbNY1qgyuwY#t=33m
"I thought feminists were supposed to be about wearing what you like. Suppose that doesn't apply to the MEN, does it? Men's rights for peace. [sarcastic tone] Men are the real victims."

Transphobia:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cy0mWziFrI#t=1m45s
ddf235825394351b24164cc4c9d379b5.png

"The gameplay is best described as single-player co-op. And I know that sounds like saying 'I'm not gay, I only suck off pantomime dames', but it is."
"It's hard to sympathise when you have to put spotty mcbumblefuck through the X-ray machine cause his passport says he's a GIRL. And the last precious seconds in the day trickle out as you examine a picture of his hairy balls."

i remember shirtgate. i still feel sorry for him. he helped land a fucking spacecraft on a comet and people were still pissed off at him for his (tacky) shirt. like i get that the shirt was in poor taste but did you really have to make him cry? you know if anything you made me like Yahtzee more. which is weird cuz i never really liked his shtick in the first place.
 
Classic whataboutism from TB there. You can literally see that he thought "How can I talk about this without coming down on my friend like a ton of bricks? I know I'll just make some facile points about this article rather than say anything substantial about the complete bullshit my friend was spouting earlier"

Utter coward.
Yep. A complete waste of anyone's time.
 

grim-tales

Member
The TB thing also goes on to say that you should divorce artist from art. Does disagree with jontron a few times but mostly defends his "right to say it"

Edit: he doesnt agree with jontrons views

I agree he has the "right to say it" (Jontron's views), equally we should have the right to call somebody out on racist shit.

Edit: Gamers are "vulnerable"/"on the spectrum", what the fuck?! :s

TB sounds like someone from the UK trying to imitate an American voice mixed with RP, reading a teleprompter.

I wish it was always easy to seperate art/artist as TB says, but on this occasion, not sure I can because its changing how I see him (JT). JT's art IS the artist and part of his personality in the videos.
 

Flux

Member
I enjoy gaming, I do not care about the culture surrounding YouTubers. I can safely ignore this. My only thought I had during the day was what do kids do who watch stuff like this? They lost two stars recently with pewdiepie being a neo-nazi and John Tron going on this alt right rant. Hopefully they can move away from sources of hate and just enjoy the hobby.
 

danm999

Member
Nah fuck that TB trying to turn this shit on Gizmondo. They hung him with the rope he provided.

I mean the only questionable sentence in that whole article is "Menghele would be proud" but given it's in relation to talking about how it's a problem immigrants enter the US gene pool I'm not actually sure it's even that much of a stretch. I can see Joseph Menghele earnestly being proud of a statement like that.
 

Nanashrew

Banned
I'm 17 minutes into this audio post and all he is doing is blaming the media for every little thing and attributes their criticism of games as an attack on the people that play them which radicalizes those people. He's also talking about how games are already really diverse.

If all it takes is a simple criticism of a video game to radicalize you into some kind of white supremacist, then you already hold those beliefs and just found a reason to come out as one and hangout with them.
 
That art/artist platitude is so fucking lazy and asinine. There's a whole spectrum between being a jerk as a private person and spouting batshit insane hardcore white supremacy talking points.
If anything, this kind of posture downplays the latter and is pretty telling.

If your first instinct is to make an audio blog carrying water for blatant racism, think about what that says about him.

He would rather make an audio blog about the problems with Gawker than address "diluting the gene pool".

Think about this.
Exactly. It's "Ethics" all over again.
 

Tommy DJ

Member
TB does in fact say "Do I believe the things he said? No of course not." in the audio blog. He even calls himself a "british lefty", which is fucking laughable at this point.

But instead of actually talking about it, he just mentions it for 2-3 seconds and then spends the rest of the time just attacking Gizmodo, and significantly underplays everything Jontron said. That's not agreeing with JT exactly, it's a deliberate redirection of any anger away from him and towards Gizmodo instead.

Yeah its bloody tiring at this point. That's literally the same gameplan the majority of the alt-right go straight to every goddamn time. Rather than discussing the points in good faith, they go straight to the deflection/this is a media beat up/fake news angle while presenting themselves as the rational adult in the room.

They might even say they don't condone the situation yet they'll devote most of their time picking apart an article for the purpose of I don't know why.

If you aren't going to spend the majority of your podcast ripping on JT, why the hell are you even talking about Gizmodo's perhaps shoddy reporting unless your goal is to muddy the water for the casual viewer who might end up believing JT is getting beat up by liberal media/fake news/whatever?
 

guybrushfreeman

Unconfirmed Member
If your first instinct is to make an audio blog carrying water for blatant racism, think about what that says about him.

He would rather make an audio blog about the problems with Gawker than address "diluting the gene pool".

Think about this.

Seriously, what the fuck. How can he say he's not defending it but then spend more time criticising an article highlighting it then criticising the hateful shit itself? He's absolutely defending and supporting it with this shit
 
Can you give the time stamp for this ones?

It was ballpark 9 minute mark after he finished declaring Gizmodo the devil of the world, inciting hatred and harassment at JonTron to make money, will stop at nothing to gain money, etc. Don't have an exact time. He says he's a lefty and doesn't agree why would he but then goes on another 6-10 mins complaining about Gizmodo and how they're the ones creating alt-right people.
 

Dynasty

Member
Classic whataboutism from TB there. You can literally see that he thought "How can I talk about this without coming down on my friend like a ton of bricks? I know I'll just make some facile points about this article rather than say anything substantial about the complete bullshit my friend was spouting earlier"

Utter coward.

As a fan of TB and someone who watched his videos regulary this is how I see it, he wants to deflect attention from his friend. I agree with some of his points but he should be talking more about Jon, not criticising the article.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom