Why is trying to make a random article the news and not the crazy racist outburst?
He's literally deflecting.
Why is trying to make a random article the news and not the crazy racist outburst?
I love the pre-emptive, insincere defensiveness in the description:
TB's immediate and persistent attack on the messenger rather than actually addressing the subject and content of the article is an obvious defense of Jontron. Among the points against the "hit piece" reporting of what happened with Jontron is: "the site makes money using advertising." He goes into a stunted point-by-point defense of Jontron by attacking the authors, using the "missed opportunities" angle, and the "they're jealous of his wealth" premise, among many other gems. This whole script has the structure of a Sean Hannity segment, and that's no exageration.
TB insists on "divorcing an artist from his art," meaning in this case media should not respond to wide-reaching declarations by celebrities. Which is a cowardly and nonsensical response to a personality-based celebrity using that position to attempt to make legal and social change. I DO think people can and should attempt to bring about change for the better when they have the motivation, position and audience of someone like Jontron. But it's the job of the media and audiences to criticize those attempts, exactly like we've seen here.
Total Biscuit is suggesting that criticism is inappropriate. He lyingly says it's really about how they criticized Jontron, but the majority of his points are alien to that point. Total Biscuit's commentary here is trash.
WTF do you mean if true? Listen to the audio that was linked if you don't believe him...
18 minutes into the TotalBiscuit rant and he's now lamenting about identity politics. 19 minutes in and he is talking about gaming and anime consisting of vulnerable people on the spectrum.
The fuck am I listening to. I'm stopping now.
Yo I'm sick of this bullshit "Divorcing an artist form their art" bullshit
It always comes from people who aren't having the vile shit said against them
Welp. Guess that's that then.He kinda did, he liked this tweet.
TB does in fact say "Do I believe the things he said? No of course not." in the audio blog. He even calls himself a "british lefty", which is fucking laughable at this point.
But instead of actually talking about it, he just mentions it for 2-3 seconds and then spends the rest of the time just attacking Gizmodo, and significantly underplays everything Jontron said. That's not agreeing with JT exactly, it's a deliberate redirection of any anger away from him and towards Gizmodo instead.
Yo I'm sick of this bullshit "Divorcing an artist form their art" bullshit
It always comes from people who aren't having the vile shit said against them
Yo I'm sick of this bullshit "Divorcing an artist form their art" bullshit
It always comes from people who aren't having the vile shit said against them
Can you give the time stamp for this ones?
It's in the OPCan i get a recap of what happened today? I can't watch a 2 hour debate.
I love the pre-emptive, insincere defensiveness in the description:
TB's immediate and persistent attack on the messenger rather than actually addressing the subject and content of the article is an obvious defense of Jontron. Among the points against the "hit piece" reporting of what happened with Jontron is: "the site makes money using advertising." He goes into a stunted point-by-point defense of Jontron by attacking the authors, using the "missed opportunities" angle, and the "they're jealous of his wealth" premise, among many other gems. This whole script has the structure of a Sean Hannity segment, and that's no exageration.
TB insists on "divorcing an artist from his art," meaning in this case media should not respond to wide-reaching declarations by celebrities. Which is a cowardly and nonsensical response to a personality-based celebrity using that position to attempt to make legal and social change. I DO think people can and should attempt to bring about change for the better when they have the motivation, position and audience of someone like Jontron. But it's the job of the media and audiences to criticize those attempts, exactly like we've seen here.
Total Biscuit is suggesting that criticism is inappropriate. He lyingly says it's really about how they criticized Jontron, but the majority of his points are alien to that point. Total Biscuit's commentary here is trash.
Yo I'm sick of this bullshit "Divorcing an artist form their art" bullshit
It always comes from people who aren't having the vile shit said against them
18 minutes into the TotalBiscuit rant and he's now lamenting about identity politics. 19 minutes in and he is talking about gaming and anime consisting of vulnerable people on the spectrum.
The fuck am I listening to. I'm stopping now. What a brave man using this time to attack Gizmodo about what they said about what Jontron said.
Yo I'm sick of this bullshit "Divorcing an artist form their art" bullshit
It always comes from people who aren't having the vile shit said against them
He absolutely is defending it when you go ~10 minutes doing nothing but attacking the article writer (when it's not even a story they covered first since Destiny interviewed Jon after the shit went down) instead of responding to anything and hand waves it away that it's none of our business how he came to his conclusions or why thinks what he thinks because it's his thoughts. It's a god damn strawman and whataboutism, he is absolutely defending JonTron. He just doesn't have the balls to come straight out and say it. Nice try though!It's amsuing how few people actually take the effort listening and make dumb replies.
This is what he says a bit later on:
- Doesn't agree with Jon Tron in the slighest. He considers himself a Brittish leftie
- Finds Jon Tron's view quite frankly bizarre and wonders how he got them in in his head
- That being said, he seperates the art from the artist because otherwise he wouldn't be able to enjoy a lot anymore since if you go to the source of a lot of media, the creators often don't have great view either.
- Finds Gizmodo's article very poor because they asked for comment 10 minutes before the article went up. Lack of rebuttals to what JonTron said by factual information.
- Finds Gizmodo part of the problem that created the alt-right/white nationalism among gamers. (a surprising vunerable group)
Some of the stuff he says I'm a bit 'eh, a bit of a stretch'. But in no way is he defending JonTron of what he said. But he seems more annoyed at how poorly the article is written overall.
Welp. Guess that's that then.
Dude's arguing that Jon isn't the best debater and is being taken out of context. Gif implies jon's kinda right too. Shame that Arin seems fine with Jon's shit.
I think you've interpreted it wrong... or perhaps I have?Welp. Guess that's that then.
Dude's arguing that Jon isn't the best debater and is being taken out of context. Gif implies jon's kinda right too. Shame that Arin seems fine with Jon's shit.
It's from the movie 'The Interview'. James Franco's character just landed in North Korea.Means that? I interpretated that "Jon is different from what's happening but THE SAME" maybe someone can tell us about the gif and the meaning?
- That being said, he seperates the art from the artist because otherwise he wouldn't be able to enjoy a lot anymore since if you go to the source of a lot of media, the creators often don't have great view either.
I'm surprised people haven't kept up on Yahtzee (Ben Croshaw). I mean the fedora didn't give it away?There might be more examples, but I barely follow him and remembered this stuff. He's not gone white nationalist and alt-right like Jontron has, so far...but he's definitely anti-feminist, anti-social justice, and a bit more conservative.
Just not a fan of social justice:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZssC5Iw4XrA
"You know, whatever you think is currently the thing ruining video games, be it publishers, misogyny, social justice, Mumm-Ra or lead in the water pipes, it seems to be doing a fucking poor job of it because games have been pretty good lately. Maybe that's the equivalent of saying 'Ooh, it's a bit cold today, so much for global warming'. But I digress."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbNY1qgyuwY#t=1563
"If social justice tries to get up your case, all you need to do is flick V signs and blow an arse brick. Just whatever they say, go *blows raspberries*. At length. Keep doing it...Fuck you social justice for ruining the best day of that guy's life [shirtgate]."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbNY1qgyuwY#t=33m
"I thought feminists were supposed to be about wearing what you like. Suppose that doesn't apply to the MEN, does it? Men's rights for peace. [sarcastic tone] Men are the real victims."
Transphobia:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Cy0mWziFrI#t=1m45s
![]()
"The gameplay is best described as single-player co-op. And I know that sounds like saying 'I'm not gay, I only suck off pantomime dames', but it is."
"It's hard to sympathise when you have to put spotty mcbumblefuck through the X-ray machine cause his passport says he's a GIRL. And the last precious seconds in the day trickle out as you examine a picture of his hairy balls."
Yep. A complete waste of anyone's time.Classic whataboutism from TB there. You can literally see that he thought "How can I talk about this without coming down on my friend like a ton of bricks? I know I'll just make some facile points about this article rather than say anything substantial about the complete bullshit my friend was spouting earlier"
Utter coward.
I have no context, how much did he have to how much he has now?
The TB thing also goes on to say that you should divorce artist from art. Does disagree with jontron a few times but mostly defends his "right to say it"
Edit: he doesnt agree with jontrons views
well also usually that only works when that person's "art" is more artistically sound than "playing video games on the internet"
It's in the OP
Do try to watch it though
well also usually that only works when that person's "art" is more artistically sound than "playing video games on the internet"
Exactly. It's "Ethics" all over again.If your first instinct is to make an audio blog carrying water for blatant racism, think about what that says about him.
He would rather make an audio blog about the problems with Gawker than address "diluting the gene pool".
Think about this.
Three million unsubs in less than fifteen hours.
TB does in fact say "Do I believe the things he said? No of course not." in the audio blog. He even calls himself a "british lefty", which is fucking laughable at this point.
But instead of actually talking about it, he just mentions it for 2-3 seconds and then spends the rest of the time just attacking Gizmodo, and significantly underplays everything Jontron said. That's not agreeing with JT exactly, it's a deliberate redirection of any anger away from him and towards Gizmodo instead.
If your first instinct is to make an audio blog carrying water for blatant racism, think about what that says about him.
He would rather make an audio blog about the problems with Gawker than address "diluting the gene pool".
Think about this.
Can you give the time stamp for this ones?
Classic whataboutism from TB there. You can literally see that he thought "How can I talk about this without coming down on my friend like a ton of bricks? I know I'll just make some facile points about this article rather than say anything substantial about the complete bullshit my friend was spouting earlier"
Utter coward.