univariate
Banned
RIP. Gaming is changing
What's quantum break, what is sunset overdrive, what is recore,what is scalebound, what great forza games have they released. A great halo game.
People are commenting before thinking.
Zipper were giving chance after chance and failed, and they waited for the game to tank numerous times. Bend was canned when? Liverpool was a small studio.
What's quantum break, what is sunset overdrive, what is recore,what is scalebound, what great forza games have they released. A great halo game.
People are commenting before thinking.
Layoffs are to be expected if they have nothing to work on, I'm sure even if the game would've released most of the layoffs would've still happened except for maybe Stig Asmussen. A bit like for Sucker Punch.
RIP. Gaming is changing
Liverpool made wipeout. Holy crap it's psygnosis the best f1 games. Etc. People have sweetie thinking. Lionhead made Fable 3 tgat was universally seen as a let down after Fable 2. Then they were working on this. Like I've said it is sad news but the content from a lot of people in this thread is embarassing to read
Almost all of that is not MGS.
Another sign that MS is moving away from the traditional console business?
QB, SO, Recore, Scalebound are all 3rd party titles.
Forza is solid I agree
Halo is tanking by series standards and many feel the franchise isn't what it used to be.
There is very little good that can be said about MS / Xbone this generation
Enlighten us, please, im serious BTWNo not at all, if you played the game you know why that happened.
Are you thinking that they're closing European studios to potentially open new ones in the US? Otherwise I doubt this has anything to do with the location of said studios.Or Microsoft are just being fucking stupid regarding Europe like always.
Quite the opposite in fact. Sony are in it for the money. They release second tier titles all the time because second tier titles pad out the platform library, helping to move consoles early, and by the later stages of a generation second tier titles move enough copies to pay for themselves and then some. It's a worthwhile cycle for keeping studios that haven't nailed a big breakout title open and profitable with the potential of catching such a breakout down the road.
Nintendo is also all about making paper. They've stuck by what they've defined as the "core" franchises and keep iterating on them with a strong focus in quality, even when farmed out to 3rd parties. End result is that Nintendo's "core" titles always sell millions, even on under-performing hardware. In fact, they're frequently the saving grace of under-performing hardware.
Microsoft on the other hand is only willing to get involved in video games as a means to an end - home media convergence being that end. The money that could be made via having a strong stable of second tier studios and IPs serviced by them is not interesting to Microsoft, even though there is a clear window within which you can make good return on investment, something MS has been dubious with on most new initiatives.
Microsoft is not and has never been truly invested in the video game industry. This is where Sweeney is right to question their Windows Store/DX12/executable integration as MS has made it pretty clear they're only engaged as long as there is a clear benefit to the "vision" of the company to be capitalized on. They could dump Windows Store external usage of DX12 and their executable wrapper in a hot minute just like they did with GFWL. As we saw with GFWL MS won't even do basic cleanup on their own products broken by such a move.
They're the least financially motivated of the three platform producers. All they want is to not get left out on the next big thing. Gates and co. built the company on seeing and maneuvering to own the "personal computer" explosion. Since then they've been on the outside looking in at almost every major tech wave that couldn't be simply bought in to and somehow have managed to fail at a good number of the ones where buying into it should have been a viable strategy. They have a toxic corporate culture by most accounts that is entirely incompatible with external studios and branches. I could continue with the negatives but at this point it feels like piling on.
The real question isn't if MS are going to pull completely out of the gaming sector, it's when, how jagged is the cut they make to severe themselves, and how much damage does that cause to game development as a whole and PC gaming in particular when they do.
QB, SO, Recore, Scalebound are all 3rd party titles.
Forza is solid I agree
Halo is tanking by series standards and many feel the franchise isn't what it used to be.
There is very little good that can be said about MS / Xbone this generation
OK but what does one have to do with the other? Bend was also not closed. Why would anyone bring up sony in this thread? Wipeout is a small franchise, as much as I like it, and yes that sucks, but relevance here?
Whoa calm down, the "bone" is actually performing better than their most successful console...
As an example that a company shutting a studio doesn't mean they are walking away from console or game development, that is all
lol yeah completely changing the entire concept of the game is just "retooling"? That would cost even more money. The money spent is already spent. You can't unspend it, but you have to make smart decisions about how much more money to put into something that you have no faith in.
And it's not really unprecedented. The history of this industry is littered with games that were canned just as they were going to ship for a variety of reasons.
You can play the game single player, with a party of three heroic AI companions that follow your lead through stories and adventures. Or you can play cooperatively with up to three friends and discover the games quests and content together.
No not at all, if you played the game you know why that happened.
Enlighten us, please, im serious BTW
Idd. Fable Legends would have needed a massive retooling for it to become an okay single player game.i dont think it could have been retooled.
The writing has been on the wall ever since Microsoft announced their big shift in direction for Xbox. Anything that doesn't fit into their new vision was going to get the boot, and nothing is really safe unless it's a sure hit. And in the event that this new vision doesn't pan out, the cuts will get deeper and deeper. Microsoft isn't really interested in Xbox as a hardware platform the way they were in the past, so this might be a sign that they're not planning to stay in that market.
Are you thinking that they're closing European studios to potentially open new ones in the US? Otherwise I doubt this has anything to do sith the location.
It wouldn't have been changing the whole concept of the game to make it single player only:
https://www.fablelegends.com/faq
If you get rid of the co-op element you remove the need for servers, maintenance and future patches.
Name me another recent game that has been completely cancelled this close to completion. I certainly can't think of one. Games get cancelled all the time, but this game was pretty much finished.
I can't stop laughing. Microsoft Games Studios has been a trainwreck for years.
Fuckin hell.
Enlighten us, please, im serious BTW
QB, SO, Recore, Scalebound are all 3rd party titles.
Forza is solid I agree
Halo is tanking by series standards and many feel the franchise isn't what it used to be.
There is very little good that can be said about MS / Xbone this generation
Yea, i know that, and your basically re-iterating what I said. Microsoft wants to own your living room, and I believe who Bill games asked from Sony if they were willing to use Windows operating system for their console, Sony exec told him to fuck off. Best decision they ever made IMHO.
Gates and MS have a bad reputation at putting up a stink when they don't get what they want.
ANd I know this is really harsh, but if they leave, I will not miss them. I enjoyed my time with gears, halo, but in terms of legacy, they just never gave a shit, and I think most of the original; xbox team knew that after 360.
If sega had the means would love them so get back into the fight, but they don't have the capital. But imagine if sega did make a machine with collaboration with MS? Because that's who original XBox kind of was born was through the death of the Dreamcast.
It wouldn't have been changing the whole concept of the game to make it single player only:
https://www.fablelegends.com/faq
If you get rid of the co-op element you remove the need for servers, maintenance and future patches.
Name me another recent game that has been completely cancelled this close to completion. I certainly can't think of one. Games get cancelled all the time, but this game was pretty much finished.
I never said otherwise, but that's not what people are saying.
What's gonna happen to 343 after Halo 6? Is The Coalition just gonna be pumping out Gears games for as long as that studio is active? Things eventually get tiring. People are already getting fatigued from Halo. The best games on Xbox are usually the third-party titles.Honestly, I don't think Fable was ever really on the level of being as safe as Halo, Forza, and Gears.
Even with it selling fairly well, it always seemed pretty obvious that there was a general disappointment in the series from all angles and that MS and Lionhead were always scrambling to find ways to rework it into something that stood out better (and beyond the absurd hype built up for the first game).
They've been doing this for a long time now, and it amazes me that they haven't realized that the mass market actually sees it as a bad thing. Probably Sony's biggest advantage is the sheer breadth of their catalogue - not the AAA titles. They have something for everyone.
Wondering how buying Mojang fits into this list of mostly if not all other negative points? I know it's not organic growth internally, but it can only be a boon to MSFT overall buying the maker of arguably the most popular franchise worldwide today in Minecraft right..?
They are all first party titles. The developers are not all owned by MS. The shift seems to be MS moving on from owning huge studios that produce their first party games, to making deals with independent developers to produce their first party games, but they are all first party games.
There are a lot of people in here stating that it's a sign of what ms is doing.
Not aiming at you tho man. All love over here. Just saying some people are really reaching in here
What's gonna happen to 343 after Halo 6? Is The Coalition just gonna be pumping out Gears games? Things eventually get tiring. People are already getting fatigued from Halo. The best games on Xbox are usually the third-party titles.
It's been like this since the start of the OG Xbox. Microsoft always experiments in the beginning with different genres but in the end the focus is always back to Halo. This E3 is gonna be a test to see if they want to continue experimenting or fall back on their safe franchises.
I gotta agree with this. Freaking crazy that people are not assigning blame to Phil.
I wish everyone that lost their jobs good luck as they try to find something else.
Nope. This is just MS being MS. You haven't followed what MS has been doing since the early days of the Xbox 360 with respect to their studios?RIP. Gaming is changing