Saturnman said:
But you're a bit like Catzgirl, when your name is uttered (or your post touched/quoted), you will appear (though she posts less in forums nowadays so it's less true).
Vanity and the desire to impress is not just about looks, it's also about who you are, what you can do and how it is projected. Your posts are like your babies, meticulously constructed, you say it's your desire to be thorough, but you've got to wonder if you really need to be
that thorough. You know, among artists, there's often that same desire to show off, even if you don't necessarily make a spectacle of every artwork you do.
If you were truly completely modest and anonymous, it's likely you'd just be a lurker here and wouldn't feel the need to address every post mentionning you and every one of your quoted posts.
That's my brief analysis of the Loki psyche.
What insipid psychoanalysis. Should I respond? Well, if I do so, it will have to be with one of my "babies", so I guess I'm screwed either way, right? :lol
As for responding when I'm mentioned, it's usually only when I'm being insulted (at OA, for example), or when I'm just kidding around with people who've said something about me in good fun; when quoted, it's because things I say are sometimes taken out of context and, yes, I have to clarify. When people mention my name here, I seldom respond-- do a search, for all I care; try to find threads
I was not already involved in where, once someone mentioned my name, I became involved in the thread.
And when did I ever say that I was "completely anonymous", or that I desired to be so? I don't-- I'm part of a discussion forum here, and we discuss things. If I just wanted to read, I'd read a book, no? They're better written than anything here, at least, including my own posts. As for "modesty", well, I'm not sure how that fits in to what you're saying. If I posted a thread whose title was (hypothetically-- I don't believe this

) "Drinky Crow is a tard", and he responded, does that make him immodest? Is it "immodest" to want to speak to slander and correct possible misrepresentations of my opinions by others? No, that's not immodest, that's
common sense, and anyone with half a brain could see that. But I obviously couldn't have asked that much of you, could I...
Incidentally, if I really wanted to tear your "argument" to pieces, I'd ask you for evidence of this so-called "immodesty" on my part, links and all. But I'm not cruel, Sman, and so I will let the more rational among us decide for themselves whether I have acted "immodestly" herein or elsewhere based on my typical conduct. I
hope you realize, however, that you're basically "reading meaning" into my actions, as all I did is post my pic (first time in 5 years) and you then proceeded to launch into some spiel about my purported "vanity". Whatever dude...
In terms of my posts, I will not deny that I desire to express my opinions to my fullest potential, in as much detail as
I (not you, not anyone else) see fit, as I feel that they're important enough to be given expression (as is everybody else's opinion-- I can't write their posts for them, however

). That's no sin; please don't take out the frustration you feel due to the fact that the majority of
your opinions are so ill-considered and superficial as to not merit a thorough explication on little old
me. My thought is nuanced; yours, not so, as evidenced by the quality of your "reasoning" in this very thread. I am comforted by the fact that anyone with a functioning frontal lobe will be able to see what you have done here, and how specious it is.
Please desist, or I won't be so kind next time. This is the second time you've started in with me now for no good reason. The type of utter nonsense you've introduced to this thread has no place here, and you're well aware of that fact. It's indicative of the type of man you are that you felt it incumbent upon yourself to take pot shots at me, but I suppose that was to be expected. And yes, I
do need to be "that" thorough, because I have a lot to say and am very opinionated, not to "show off". If it bothers you that much, petition the mods to limit posts to 500 words; until then, kindly be quiet.
Apparently, you only believe in Occam's Razor when it suits you-- for everything else (namely, my posting habits), you construct these elaborate and implausible theories that only serve to make you look like a dunce. Bravo, Saturnman.