As someone who hates constantly backing out of my game on PS4 to manage my party/messages and all that shit, it doesn't wholeheartedly destroy my dreams like it seems to be for others either, but it certainly needs an explanation to prove to us that it can still be an elegant solution. I'm not saying people who are mad are wrong, I'm just saying it's not a deal-breaker for me and I could see it working fine.
They'll have the switch in front of them and if they're not online you could text them anyway or message then through ANY app, even PlayStation or Xbox apps. You're not making sense and I'm getting dizzy from all the spin.People are having problems with a mandatory app but it does guarantee that all your gaming friends use the same app. Makes game invites easier when no one is in fromt of the console. Especially with the portable nature of the Switch.
I believe that some functionality will also carry over to the UI. Think of it as a car phone kit solution. You connect the phone to the car via bluetooth and you can use buttons on the car interface to call people or speak to people, adjust volume, play music and all that kind of stuff. You dont actually have to use your phone for that. I believe something like that will be implemented for Switch as wel.
You're welcome, link is below. Best part is you can do it on console AND your phone.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.playstation.mobilemessenger
I can play the Switch online just fine without any of those things.
This seems to be the main argument that's been going in circles for quite some time now. We have two main facts that people keep falling back to:
- Nintendo/Reggie have stated that voice chat/matchmaking work through the dedicated app.
- Nintendo/Reggie have not given us any details about built in OS functions besides a brief glimpse of the "home" screen.
Based on point number 1, it seems highly likely that the OS itself won't allow for voice chat. This isn't confirmed, but we have enough information to make an assumption (right or wrong).
My bet is that we'll have a Direct soon that details the OS for day one. It doesn't seem likely at this point that they'll say the Switch can do voice chat without the app, but it's on them to clarify that either way. Either way, you can't really blame people for assuming that voice chat can only be done via the app.
I'm pretty sure it can't do all the things Nintendo is saying theirs will do (like manage party chat)
Yes.Well. Let's just keep bickering and arguing about something we don't know the full details for. It's speculation on how exactly it will work.
Do you honesty think Nintendo would screw people over who don't have a smart device?
Well. Let's just keep bickering and arguing about something we don't know the full details for. It's speculation on how exactly it will work.
Do you honesty think Nintendo would screw people over who don't have a smart device?
The app launches in a limited version during the summer. Full version in the fall.The online trial starts in March, not summer. Which will be really damn confusing and annoying if there really is no form of voice chat until the app comes out. That's not me saying that I think there will be voice chat without the app, just that it's insane to wait that long.
Poor ARMS/MK8 Deluxe...
You're welcome, link is below. Best part is you can do it on console AND your phone.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.playstation.mobilemessenger
They'll have the switch in front of them and if they're not online you could text them anyway or message then through ANY app, even PlayStation or Xbox apps. You're not making sense and I'm getting dizzy from all the spin.
Well. Let's just keep bickering and arguing about something we don't know the full details for. It's speculation on how exactly it will work.
Do you honesty think Nintendo would screw people over who don't have a smart device?
The smart phone app that were creating, that will be part of our online service, we believe is going to be a very compelling part of the overall proposition because thats how youll voice chat, thats how youll do your matchmaking, and create your lobby.
So Nintendo fanboys are like Trump supporters.Nintendo: We require you to use an app.
Nintendo fans: do you really think they'll require you to use an app?
Well. Let's just keep bickering and arguing about something we don't know the full details for. It's speculation on how exactly it will work.
Do you honesty think Nintendo would screw people over who don't have a smart device?
Nicalis tweeted this (hurray for more games)
https://twitter.com/nicalis/status/822140483279286272
What's that little red message icon for if not what we're discussing here?
Can you? Really? Like, right now?
Nicalis tweeted this (hurray for more games)
https://twitter.com/nicalis/status/822140483279286272
What's that little red message icon for if not what we're discussing here?
Well. Let's just keep bickering and arguing about something we don't know the full details for. It's speculation on how exactly it will work.
Do you honesty think Nintendo would screw people over who don't have a smart device?
Did you mix up the quotes because I really don't understand now what you're trying to argue.
Anyhow, let me try again. Let's do it with baby steps:
Paid online subscription starts in Fall. Trial in the summer.
Smartphone app to be launched in Fall. A free, limited version of it to launch in summer. (that would imply that the main app is paid)
See a pattern? Anything wrong in what I said until now?
Remember the Xbox one reveal?
Q: does the xbox need to connect only in order to play a gama?
A: yes, that is correct. We believe that balblabla.
People on Neogaf: OMG WE STILL DON'T HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION, STOP CRUCIFYING THEM, THEY JUST SUCK AT MESSAGING.
Seems like a close enough situation.
Yes. But more like why don't you just get a second job?The parallels are amazing. I'm assuming the PS3 price reveal also went down the same way...
When something as inept like this comes up you have to speak out against it. As much as we love Nintendo there are some of us who don't accept everything that is being rammed down our throats. There are so many platforms from PC, Xbox, PlayStation and various mmo's to show how a companion app should work that it's just asinine that Nintendo is doing this and some people are going against their own interests (a better experience)just to defend Nintendo.My question is for those who disagree with this (I'm in the "I don't care cause I never use this stuff anyway crowd), why are you getting so angry at those who like this or are ok with using this app? Jeeze, calling them dumb, stupid, flinging fuck around. Why does that make you so mad? Honestly curious.
It's Game News.Nicalis tweeted this (hurray for more games)
https://twitter.com/nicalis/status/822140483279286272
What's that little red message icon for if not what we're discussing here?
The only reason I can think why they would do this outside of being completely inept is that they want to reduce as much processing overhead that the Switch handles since it is already pretty underpowered.
That's not even happening in this thread at all, lol. People are calling out those who are supporting this app and an external smart device being required for basic functionality, and with good reason - there is literally no good reason to not include this functionality on the console AND the app.My question is for those who disagree with this (I'm in the "I don't care cause I never use this stuff anyway crowd), why are you getting so angry at those who like this or are ok with using this app? Jeeze, calling them dumb, stupid, flinging fuck around. Why does that make you so mad? Honestly curious.
I'm not even mad about this.
1. It takes away additional computing stress from the Switch.
2. I always have my iPhone 6S Plus on me and I use it to tweet, text, look up FAQ.
3. I'm not worried about lack of battery as I have an external battery charger.
4. I would be using Apples Airpod so I'm good on the wireless portion.
I don't care if people are okay with using this app. If people straight up say it's a good idea to not have these features on the console then yeah they're stupid, and pretty selfish.My question is for those who disagree with this (I'm in the "I don't care cause I never use this stuff anyway crowd), why are you getting so angry at those who like this or are ok with using this app? Jeeze, calling them dumb, stupid, flinging fuck around. Why does that make you so mad? Honestly curious.
Yes. But more like why don't you just get a second job?
The really big questions are still:
- Is there a way to mux game audio and voice chat through the phone?
- How does the Switch connect to the phone? And most importantly does it directly connect to the phone or does it have to connect via the Internet. Because that would be least elegant solution to online ever.
The answer he gave is completely nonsensical because anything you can do in this regard on a smartphone you could do natively if they wanted.
Zelda is 900p with lots of pop-in. That's pretty underpowered... It's not even a new gen game.Holy shit not THAT underpowered
Its multitudes more powerful than every system that came before it that can offer this functionality natively
Zelda is 900p with lots of pop-in. That's pretty underpowered... It's not even a new gen game.
i like how the only defense of this idiocy is straight-up denial
We all know that Nintendo's offering is really weak but the vita can handle this. I'm sure the switch can handle a list and a VoIP client.The only reason I can think why they would do this outside of being completely inept is that they want to reduce as much processing overhead that the Switch handles since it is already pretty underpowered.
Right, but I'm saying it is far more underpowered than the PS4 and Xbox One and they want to get multi platform games and have to scrounge for every cycle hey can.Holy shit not THAT underpowered
Its multitudes more powerful than every system that came before it that can offer this functionality natively
The Vita was never trying to get console multi platform ports like the Switch will be.We all know that Nintendo's offering is really weak but the vita can handle this. I'm sure the switch can handle a list and a VoIP client.
The Wii U's OS has access to exactly 32 times more memory than the Xbox 360's OS, which supports party chat.Zelda is 900p with lots of pop-in. That's pretty underpowered... It's not even a new gen game.
It was a dark hilarious time. Not as frustrating as the denial in here.I wish i had witnessed this from gaf.
Right, but I'm saying it is far more underpowered than the PS4 and Xbox One and they want to get multi platform games and have to scrounge for every cycle hey can.
The Vita was never trying to get console multi platform ports like the Switch will be.
I kind of recall the backlash from that to be far worse than what is happening here.Remember the Xbox one reveal?
Q: does the xbox need to connect only in order to play a gama?
A: yes, that is correct. We believe that balblabla.
People on Neogaf: OMG WE STILL DON'T HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION, STOP CRUCIFYING THEM, THEY JUST SUCK AT MESSAGING.
Seems like a close enough situation.
Its just part of gamer culture.My question is for those who disagree with this (I'm in the "I don't care cause I never use this stuff anyway crowd), why are you getting so angry at those who like this or are ok with using this app? Jeeze, calling them dumb, stupid, flinging fuck around. Why does that make you so mad? Honestly curious.
Those were $500 smartphone, asshole!